Bugs item #575307, was opened at 2002-06-29 00:57
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=575307group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 9
Submitted By: T. Subramanian (t_subbu)
Number of tests run: 834
Successful tests: 829
Errors:3
Failures: 2
[time of test: 29 July 2002 0:34 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
Hi guys!
With this email I want to draw your attention to some stuff that is
going on in the FAQ forum. You might be interested ...
- I created a thread called Migration from JBoss 3.0.0 to 3.0.1. If
you know that people will need to change something in the migration
process then please
Just found this one on sourceforge
http://sourceforge.net/projects/quartz/
--description---
An enterprise-class job scheduler for integration with stand-alone java
applications and full-blown J2EE applications. Advanced features include
clustering, participation in XA transactions and JMS
Bugs item #588068, was opened at 2002-07-30 00:48
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=588068group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #588068, was opened at 2002-07-29 07:48
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=588068group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #504481, was opened at 2002-01-16 17:58
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=504481group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 9
Submitted By: Shravan (cskreddy74)
Assigned to:
On 2002.07.27 21:41:58 -0400 Scott M Stark wrote:
What is the use case for this type of depends? Right now we
still have several bugs relating to dependency and deployment
issues that I want stablized before we continue to expand the
notion of the service life-cycle.
I don't have a
Number of tests run: 834
Successful tests: 830
Errors:3
Failures: 1
[time of test: 29 July 2002 12:34 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.4.0_01
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
Bugs item #588241, was opened at 2002-07-29 16:38
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=588241group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Joe Simone (jsimone)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #588248, was opened at 2002-07-29 17:00
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=588248group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Joe Simone (jsimone)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #588248, was opened at 2002-07-29 14:00
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=588248group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Joe Simone (jsimone)
I've been using the explanation of failure style, I hadn't really
considered the other. I would like to switch. I've found writing the
explanation of failure messages exceedingly confusing.
david jencks
On 2002.07.29 12:07:59 -0400 Scott M Stark wrote:
In the assertTrue(String message,
Bugs item #588241, was opened at 2002-07-29 20:38
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=588241group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Joe Simone (jsimone)
Assigned to:
Good, because its these statements that I'm looking at and thinking
the tests are not written correctly.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Don't the other Assert.* methods like Assert.assertEquals(a,b) format
the message at all? I would expect this to show a message like a was
not equal to b (and should have been).
--jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David
Number of tests run: 855
Successful tests: 389
Errors:446
Failures: 20
[time of test: 30 July 2002 0:51 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_03]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems
Bugs item #588312, was opened at 2002-07-29 19:11
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=588312group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Luttrell (objec)
Assigned to:
I'm tracking down what I broke here.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 5:01 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(HEAD
Bugs item #588314, was opened at 2002-07-30 00:13
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=588314group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul Austin (p_d_austin)
Assigned
Hi Kasper
Jada, Jada, Jada. Big words for simple stuff.
It uses Java interfaces which must be implemented by the
target whereas JBoss Scheduler use MBeans that are much
more flexible.
XA Transaction can be used by the target MBean, JMS as well.
Have fun - Andy
- Original Message -
Bugs item #588241, was opened at 2002-07-29 16:38
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=588241group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Joe Simone (jsimone)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #588314, was opened at 2002-07-29 17:13
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=588314group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul Austin (p_d_austin)
Bugs item #566073, was opened at 2002-06-08 03:18
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=566073group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Roder (roder)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Bugs item #588357, was opened at 2002-07-29 19:50
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=588357group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Buikhuizen (nznl)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #588241, was opened at 2002-07-29 15:38
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=588241group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Joe Simone (jsimone)
Assigned to:
Hi All,
I recently made a inquiry into why I'm having difficulty looking up the Mail
service in version 3.0.0 (see Installation and Configuration subject:
Everything's Changed). It's been a while since I posted. At any rate, I
decided to do a little snooping around in the JavaMail API for JBoss
The MailService is an out of date an apparently rarely used mbean
as people rarely ask about it. It existence merely satisfies the need
to provide a JavaMail session via JNDI as dictated by the spec. If
you can improve it that would be great.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology
Why am I seeing these DEPRECATED in my builds in main lately?
There are no available tags in the testsuite build.xml file.
one-test:
[mkdir] Created dir: D:\usr\JBossMain\jboss-all\testsuite\output\reports
[delete] Deleting:
D:\usr\JBossMain\jboss-all\testsuite\output\log\test.log
30 matches
Mail list logo
