Bugs item #621270, was opened at 2002-10-10 15:07
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=621270group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 8
Submitted By: Alexei Yudichev (sflexus)
Assigned
When stopping our JBoss instance, we often encounter a hang. I did a
Ctrl-break to retrieve the thread information and there is obviously a
deadlock. Attached is the full log of the console output.
The version of log4j used is 1.1.3 according to the manifest contained
in the log4j jar.
I think
After having a look at the stack trace, it looks like the lock is coming
from this piece of code:
// HACK, something is logging exceptions line by line (including
// blanks), but I can't seem to find it, so for now just ignore
// empty lines... they aren't very useful.
if
AB Without the !isReadOnly() check, the preloaded readahead fields
AB were ignored.
Exactly. My mistake. When fixing read-only/read-time-out fields
loading I made rw fields to be loaded always. Sorry. I'll correct it
in other branches.
But in fresh Branch_3_2
Try setting strict verification to false in jboss-service.xml
Regards,
Adrian
From: Alex Loubyansky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Adrian Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Fwd: [jboss-cvs]
jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc
Proposed patch attached. Not tested...
Jerome
--- src/main/org/jboss/logging/util/CategoryStream.java 2002-10-14 14:32:20.0 +0200
+++ src/main/org/jboss/logging/util/CategoryStream.java~ 2002-10-14 14:40:07.0 +0200
-128,14 +128,11
if (len != 0) {
String msg =
Running tests-db in current HEAD on jdk1.3.1 on Win2000 I get the
exception below. There are two test-cases that fail. Sometimes they
fail eventually. Sometime, one of them, sometime both. Do someone see
it too?
The problem is in MetaData.java in getChildrenByTagName
alex
2002-10-14
Hiram Chirino wrote:
A thread concerning how to use Eclipse to develop Jboss was started a while
back.. I finally got the time to put together a little howto to explain how
to use eclipse to develop JBoss.
You will find it in the Developer Guides section of the Jboss website the
next time
Bugs item #620262, was opened at 2002-10-08 16:44
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=620262group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Marko Strukelj (mstruk)
Assigned to:
As this is regarded to cmp/cluster implementations, i thought this
questions should be posted here :
1 - How are two-phase commit implemented in JBoss? Does it takes
advantage of oracle implementation of this feature?
2 - When there are a transaction not completed at one node of cluster,
and
Hello,
Clustering with EB is very simple WRT transactions. As Weblogic, we only
failover if the access to a node has failed. If some work has already
started and an exception occurs, the transaction is rollbacked and the user
explicitly needs to deal with the exception.
Plus, you should always
Hi Sacha
and what about two-phase-commit question? We probably will need it to
use transactions involving more than one datasource. (new system -
legacy system)
Sacha Labourey wrote:
Hello,
Clustering with EB is very simple WRT transactions. As Weblogic, we only
failover if the access to
You will probably want to use Tyrex for now.
Both the jboss tm and tyrex can use XAResources from Oracle and other xa
capable resource managers, and follow the xa 2pc protocol (at least as far
as it is comprehensible). However, the jboss tm does not log transactions,
so there is no automated
David Jencks wrote:
You will probably want to use Tyrex for now.
As the author of Tyrex plugin, I have to advise you not to use Tyrex
plugin in production environments, it is very inefficient (for every
outstanding (not committed) transaction and its distributed XAResource
(or propagated
I guess that means it is high time to implement tx logging in the jboss tm.
david jencks
On 2002.10.14 14:13:26 -0400 Anatoly Akkerman wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
You will probably want to use Tyrex for now.
As the author of Tyrex plugin, I have to advise you not to use Tyrex
plugin
Number of tests run: 949
Successful tests: 948
Errors:1
Failures: 0
[time of test: 14 October 2002 13:9 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
Juha group,
After syncing with the latest source, MBean Persistence seems to be
turned off. I just did a grep for PersistenceInterceptor against the
jmx module source and came up with no instantiations of this class. What's
going on here? Any ideas?
- Matt
sorry for the simple question, but what's the difference if i use
homogeneous or heterogeneous deployment (regarding to distributed
two-phase-commit).
how could I implement the follow:
1- access a method from a session facade from a client (this have
required transaction attribute on this
Bugs item #623223, was opened at 2002-10-14 22:45
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=623223group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jerome Lacoste (lacostej)
Assigned
Bugs item #621664, was opened at 2002-10-11 03:18
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=621664group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Joe Simone (jsimone)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Bugs item #619171, was opened at 2002-10-06 09:11
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=619171group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Timur Zambalayev (timurz)
Assigned
Bugs item #621664, was opened at 2002-10-11 03:18
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=621664group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Joe Simone (jsimone)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Emerson Cargnin - SICREDI Serviços wrote:
sorry for the simple question, but what's the difference if i use
homogeneous or heterogeneous deployment (regarding to distributed
two-phase-commit).
see below.
how could I implement the follow:
1- access a method from a session facade from
Bugs item #619171, was opened at 2002-10-06 09:11
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=619171group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Timur Zambalayev (timurz)
Assigned
Bugs item #621664, was opened at 2002-10-10 21:18
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=621664group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Joe Simone (jsimone)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Thanks for pointing that problem out. We could also adjust the
project/.cvsignore file so that the directory that eclipse uses for building
gets ignored.
I don't want eclipse building to the same directory that ant builds to
because it that will throw ant's timestamps off. I've noticed some
Bugs item #620838, was opened at 2002-10-09 08:43
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=620838group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jay Petersen (s2jcpete)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Thanks for pointing that problem out. We could also adjust the
project/.cvsignore file so that the directory that eclipse uses for building
gets ignored.
I don't want eclipse building to the same directory that ant builds to
because it that will throw ant's
Bugs item #620838, was opened at 2002-10-09 15:43
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=620838group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jay Petersen (s2jcpete)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Your explanation of distributed/non distributed transactions is correct.
However, a tm should also log transactions before preparing them so there
is a persistent record of which resources were involved in the transaction.
Without this you can't recover from failure during the prepare and
30 matches
Mail list logo
