Bugs item #708691, was opened at 2003-03-24 09:21
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=708691group_id=22866
Category: JBossSOAP
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dr. Christoph Georg Jung (cgjung)
Assigned
but one of the goals of JBoss 4 is to make it so developers don't have
to deal with all the J2EE APIs
from this and the discussion in general.. Jboss4 and J2EE compliance are
two entirely
different roadmaps (IMHU).. i mean its important for everyone here to
know what direction Jboss
is going to
Are you a mail-list-bot or what?
If that is the case, you seem to be able to do useful programming in your
sparetime ;-) But your parsing subsystem seems not to cope with non-native
English emails ...
As written in a separate response to your first of the three equivalent
emails a week ago
Title: RE: [JBoss-user] jboss not starting with IBM jdk
Check
this again:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=679705group_id=22866atid=376685
I
posted the solution to the problem.
-Original Message-
From: Jordi Valldaura i Riqué [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sorry about that.
I sent the message twice, because the first attempt did not show up. If
you look at the date of the second one, you will see that it was sent
about 8 hours before the first one. It eventually arrived about 28
hours after I sent it.
I have no idea what it was doing in the
No prob, I even got it three times. Should have read the dates, but I
already disposed the original
to which I sent you the first reply ;-)
CGJ
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Stephen Coy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 24. März 2003 11:28
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re:
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.4.1_02
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
Hi,
Does anyone get problems compiling HEAD on Linux -
Caused by: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
Within the doclet stuff...
Regards,
Chris
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE
Bugs item #708762, was opened at 2003-03-24 12:06
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=708762group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul Bandler (paulbandler)
Assigned to:
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.4.1_02
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
I have never heard any of the main developers talk about JBoss4 _not_
being J2EE compatible. It has always been my understanding that the AOP
framework would form the underpinnings of JBoss4's EJB implementation
and be available as a more-flexible, lighter weight API for people who
aren't
Being compliant and the AOP features are not mutually exclusive. We
will do both.
To Brian Wallis, even if Jboss were to get certified, it would not make
your J2EE compliant applications portable. Why? There are may
important things considered outside the specification. For example,
all
Do any of you use or know of a user of the
CMPInMemoryPersistenceManager or CMPFilePersistenceManager? I would
like to get rid of them, to make the integration of the new persistence
engine easier. We will eventually have file and in memory stores under
the new persistence engine, but we
That is precisely correct Dan,
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of danch
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 8:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss/David Vs. Sun/Goliath?
I have never heard any of the
Obviously, being J2EE compliant is not my call, just expressing my opinion.
Would really be nice if Marc, Bill, or Scott could chime in. You guys there?
What is your plan in regards to this for JBoss 4?
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Being compliant and the AOP features are not mutually exclusive. We
Bugs item #708853, was opened at 2003-03-24 16:40
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=708853group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Frédéric Donckels (lubdub)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #707014, was opened at 2003-03-20 19:22
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=707014group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Simone (milasx)
Assigned to: Alexey Loubyansky
How does bug 701880 affect final release date of 3.2.0?
On Sun, 2003-03-23 at 01:11, Scott M Stark wrote:
The final release candidate prior to the final relase of 3.2.0 is available from
SourceForge here:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=22866
The release notes are
Bugs item #696633, was opened at 2003-03-03 10:34
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=696633group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Phil Dawes (pdawes)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #707014, was opened at 2003-03-20 17:22
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=707014group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Simone (milasx)
Assigned to: Alexey Loubyansky
Title: RE: [JBoss-user] jboss not starting with IBM jdk
Check
this again:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=679705group_id=22866atid=376685
I
posted the solution to the problem.
-Original Message-From: Jordi Valldaura i Riqué
[mailto:[EMAIL
Bugs item #707014, was opened at 2003-03-20 19:22
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=707014group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Simone (milasx)
Assigned to: Alexey Loubyansky
J2EE is our bread and butter. Its why most people initially come to JBoss.
We will continue to follow the specs religiously.
AOP + EJB:
For JB4, the average every-day J2EE developer won't notice anything. But,
implementing EJB in terms of the AOP framework will greatly enhance the
abilities of
Bugs item #679705, was opened at 2003-02-03 10:40
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=679705group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stefan Kuehnel (skuehnel)
I'm looking to do the 3.2.0 final release this weekend so please try to clean
up any outstanding bugs in your areas by then. I'll start putting the release
together on the 30th and finalize it something on the 31st barring any
major problems.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology
Don't! InMemory is used by clustering for HTTP Session replication.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dain
Sundstrom
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 9:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Use of InMemory and File
Where is the code that uses it?
-dain
On Monday, March 24, 2003, at 06:12 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
Don't! InMemory is used by clustering for HTTP Session replication.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Dain
Sundstrom
Sent: Monday, March
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 01:16, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
To Brian Wallis, even if Jboss were to get certified, it would not make
your J2EE compliant applications portable. Why? There are may
important things considered outside the specification. For example,
all database mappings for CMP are
You really need Eclipse.
:-)
Sorry, I couldn't help it...
- Original Message -
From: Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 8:05 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Use of InMemory and File persistent manager?
Where is the code that uses it?
If JBoss adheres to the standards as they are and will be then I
will be able
to keep using it. If it doesn't then (despite what I want to do)
I probably
won't be given the opportunity to keep using it.
Please ignore the FUD from SUN. We have and always will strictly abide by
the
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 17:07, Bill Burke wrote:
Please ignore the FUD from SUN. We have and always will strictly abide by
the standards.
As I expected you would. Thanks and keep up the great work!
brian wallis...
---
This SF.net email is
Hi!
Ground Floor! Brand New Opportunity!
Spend $47.50 One-Time...Great Product...You can't lose!
Just DO IT! Earn $20 Dollars Per Month on Everybody on
Your Smaller Side Down to Infinity!
Fantastic Product! AMAZING PAYPLAN!!!
Learn The Truth About Your Health and Much More!!!
(Watch the Video
Hello,
thank you all for answering my questions. To achieve something very
close to global cluster clock, I'v decided to implement Clustered Timer
service with the same interface as javax.management.timer.Timer.
Features:
- each added notification will be distributed on each node running
33 matches
Mail list logo
