[JBoss-dev] Running of unit test fails

2003-04-12 Thread Bela Ban
When trying to run my test cases against the cache, I get an file permission error. The permissions are okay though. What does this mean ? Bela [sjc370334 bela ]/home/bela/jboss-head/testsuite$ ./build.sh -Dtest=cache test build.sh: *WARNING* Ignoring environment value for $ANT_HOME build.sh:

Re: [JBoss-dev] Running of unit test fails

2003-04-12 Thread Scott M Stark
It means you are running with a security manager and have not defined the permissions that are needed. -- Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC Bela Ban wrote: When trying to run my test cases against the cache, I get an file

RE: [JBoss-dev] Daily tests v2

2003-04-12 Thread Sacha Labourey
Hello Fred, Could you please let me know the advance of this project? I am interested in it and willing to help setting up the environment. Cheers, Sacha -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fred Hartman Sent:

RE: [JBoss-dev] Daily tests v2

2003-04-12 Thread Fred Hartman
The idea is a simple build.xml with minimal setup (cvs client, Ant, a JDK, a couple modifications to an Ant properties file). The build.xml does the cvs copyout, compile, test case run, shutdown and then FTPs the results to a web site. This build.xml only works unattended with fixes that are in

RE: [JBoss-dev] anybody want to integrate JBoss Remoting?

2003-04-12 Thread marc fleury
I am worried that it is in JMX. It should be an MBEan with SARS. marcf -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Burke Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 11:00 PM To: Jboss-Dev Subject: [JBoss-dev] anybody want to integrate JBoss

RE: [JBoss-dev] Daily tests v2

2003-04-12 Thread Sacha Labourey
OK, We still need to find a way to make this information easy to browse (by OS/JVM vendor/JVM version/JBoss version etc.) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fred Hartman Sent: dimanche, 13. avril 2003 00:15 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'

RE: [JBoss-dev] Daily tests v2

2003-04-12 Thread Fred Hartman
Currently the UI is a JSP tree viewer built from the results directory tree, which is results/JBossVersion/OS/OSVersion/JVMProvider/JVMVersion. It will be easier to figure out what should be added to the UI once we get the server public. -Original Message- From: Sacha Labourey

RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-04-12 Thread marc fleury
1) POJO pojo = new POJO(); pojo = (POJO)Versioned.makeVersioned(pojo); That is really pretty tho :) You need to define the pojo as aspectable (advisable). or 2) Define a constructor-pointcut on the POJO class (I will implement this today.) nice, marcf Agreed. A remote proxy

RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-04-12 Thread marc fleury
If you use versioning on a POJO that is a the top of an object graph, will the children objects also be versions when they are modified??? I assume No. But I think it would make sense for your correct. Versioning interceptor to wrap up children objets with the versioning proxy also

RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-04-12 Thread marc fleury
Digging throught that thread and the bela discussion of cache. There is only one proxy, but you are correct. For each transaction, a full snapshot is taken of the real object. All access to the object is done through one proxy. The point being made was that there is another way to do this