===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
I found the problem. The UCL was being unregistered and the Remoting
framework was keeping a reference to this unregistered UCL so it would
fail on loadClass.
Bill
Scott M Stark wrote:
If it was not created through the repository factory method or
has been removed from the repository it will
If it was not created through the repository factory method or
has been removed from the repository it will be null.
--
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Bill Burke wrote:
How can a UnifiedClassLoader3's repository field be null
I'm on RH 8.0.
I'm getting java.net.SocketException: Too many open files
To get over this problem do I just expand via /proc/sys/fs/file-max? Or
is there a different way?
Thanks,
Bill
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
-
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Bugs item #784584, was opened at 2003-08-07 08:08
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by frodeo
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=784584&group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
How can a UnifiedClassLoader3's repository field be null? I'm getting
the following NPE in HEAD with the JBoss AOP remoting test:
3:07:29,912 ERROR [UnifiedClassLoader3] ULR is NULL!!
3:07:29,912 ERROR [STDERR] java.lang.NullPointerException
3:07:29,912 ERROR [STDERR] at
org.jboss.m
Perhaps, but it only occurs with this ejb. Other ejbs do not
show this issue so its has some relationship to the destroy
of the cluster-service.xml destroying the httpsession bean.
Sacha Labourey wrote:
Is that possible it comes from a recent change? I have a strange issue like
that in 3.0.8 as wel
Following up on an email Adrian sent out earlier asking if OIL2 is
being used at all, I want to remove all invocation layers but the
current perferred UIL2/JVM as these are just a waste of ports. The
service configs will be put into the docs/examples/jms dir of the
dist.
--
Yes, I'm finding that if I run tests all at once (build.bat tests) I'm
getting timeouts everywhere. If I run tests individually there is no
problem. Something is messed up here.
Bill
Francisco Reverbel wrote:
Actually my rant was not well founded. Just run all IIOP tests on
on HEAD (fresh ch
Bugs item #827567, was opened at 2003-10-21 17:00
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=827567&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: No
Is that possible it comes from a recent change? I have a strange issue like
that in 3.0.8 as well: some of the container references seems to be already
gone inside the "destroy" call.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of SourceForge.ne
You're right, Tom. My post was not an objection to the commit.
BTW: Thank you for your great work on the remoting framework!
Cheers,
Francisco
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Tom Elrod wrote:
> Per request, I am going to wait an extra day before doing commit. Am also
> assuming that the post below is no
Bugs item #827614, was opened at 2003-10-21 09:22
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=827614&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
Bugs item #827363, was opened at 2003-10-21 01:17
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=827363&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Invalid
Pri
Actually my rant was not well founded. Just run all IIOP tests on
on HEAD (fresh checkout), with no errors.
I don't understand why there were IIOP errors in the results Tom
posted. (Perhaps his server run with the "default" config, rather
than with the "all" config?)
Cheers,
Francisco
On Tue,
Bugs item #827363, was opened at 2003-10-21 11:17
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by juhalindfors
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=827363&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Pr
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Bugs item #827363, was opened at 2003-10-21 10:17
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=827363&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
Bugs item #827363, was opened at 2003-10-21 10:17
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by dsteinwe
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=827363&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priori
20 matches
Mail list logo
