On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, David Maddison wrote:
> Are there any plans to incorporate JSR-88 (Deployment API) into JBoss.
> It would seem a good idea as JSR-77 and JSR-88 seem to go hand in
> hand.
I wouldn't necessarily say they go hand in hand. 88 is a
client-oriented Java API, whereas 77
But you've got to admit, it would be a real bummer if your company
invested time, talent, and money and *then* you were all removed from the
mailing lists.
Aaron
(wondering if he'll need a Hotmail account to read the replies...)
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Bill Burke wrote:
> Don't take flame
So let me get this straight... When people want to know how to
use this open source product, they have the choice to either pay $50 or
read the comments in the source code?
Aaron
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
> The book is a complete rewrite of the subjects touched on by the
How do you compile the client code if the home/remote exists only
in the VM of the running server?
Aaron
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, marc fleury wrote:
> I know there are many tools out there that do almost what I am going to
> describe already, it is an improvement on x-doclet.
>
> I am wond
My fault, I had the case wrong (JBoss <> JBOSS). BTW, it appears
that you must provide a URL - if I use something like:
The parser refuses to accept it. In any case, is there some way
to avoid loaded the DTD at all when the validate flag is off?
Aaron
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Sc
So I'm using 2.4.0, and even with
true
false
false
true
false
When the (JBoss) web site is down JBoss won't deploy any beans. I
would have thought that with the ValidateDTDs falg set to false it
wouldn't even attempt to download them, and it certainly w
On Sat, 11 Aug 2001, David Jencks wrote:
> How about:
>
> This software may be used under the terms of the X licence or the lgpl
> licence. All current copyright holders grant permission that future
> modifications may be released under either of
> 1. this dual license
> or
> 2. the lgpl license
On Fri, 10 Aug 2001, marc fleury wrote:
> Re the license, it was started as JBoss project and then moved out and
> changed license, while the owner of the copyright (aaron) had a right to
> change his license, the code that was licensed under LGPL remains under
> LGPL.
>
> The license should there
I guess I don't understand. Does this other OR-mapping system do
a manual commit or rollback on the connection? If so, you don't need to
use the Minerva wrappers at all - you can set up a plaing JDBC pool where
there's no interaction with the TM and it's up to you to manually commit
or r
I preferred to not allow a manual rollback at all. It is probably
the case that the exception will ultimately cause a rollback. However, if
the exception is supressed for some reason, we wouldn't want the bad code
that called rollback on the connection to cause data integrity problem
wit
I have a hazy memory of someone from Sun or Blackdown saying that
they tried to allocate 2MB of stack for every thread that's created.
Though it sounds like Scott has a better handle on your actual problem, I
think that was quoted as one of the pitfalls of using many many threads.
Aaron
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, David Jencks wrote:
> When Toby Allsop was developing the jca stuff in jbosscx he often wrote
> that all resource access would be moved to the jca framework soon ( I hope
> I'm not misquoting).
>
> I think this means rabbit hole, and I think this is a good idea.
>
> I think th
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
> When you make a change to a branch you need to tag it with the
> next beta binary release tag: Rel_...
Are you saying that a release does not just label and use the
"head of the branch" but is built based on a label created at the time of
the pre
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
> I don't know what happened to the dtds so I restored them in the doco_files
> web site dir for now. These should be coming from the
> src/resources/org/jboss/metadata
> of the jboss cvs module as these are the authoritative version of the dtds
> that are
Just a little while ago there was a file on the web site:
http://www.jboss.org/doco_files/jboss_2_4.dtd
But now it's gone. The 2.2 one (jboss.dtd) is still there. Was
this intentional?
It looks like some of the latest DTDs claim that the URL should be
http://www.jboss.
So what do I have to do to get SourceForge to recognize me instead
of calling me "51402"? I've ssh'd to cvs.jboss.sourceforge.net
& jboss.sourceforge.net, which I thought was supposed to register the
account, and I do get a prompt with my username... But when I check in, I
get:
[EMAIL
So the EJB 1.1 and 2.0 PFD2 specs clarify that if you hava a
method parameter that's an array, you list it in your DD with []. (See
the description for the method element in the DD.) For example,
java.lang.String[]
Unfortunately, JBoss doesn't recognize this, as the metadata
cl
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Bill Burke wrote:
> You can shut it down very easy from the JMX interface. Starting up is a
> different story.
Last time I tried this, it unloaded all the beans and services,
but did not actually cause the JVM to exit, so JBoss was still taking a
boatload of system r
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Jay Walters wrote:
> I don't edit my xml by hand or by tool, I generate it!
That's not always realistic. It works great if you're writing new
code for JBoss only, but if you have a pile of existing WebLogic JARs, or
you're not free to add arbitrary JavaDoc tags or wh
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Jay Walters wrote:
> You guys wouldn't want to hear my stories... suffice it to say I agree that
> if you can't understand to edit the properties files by hand you probably
> shouldn't be editing them with a GUI...
That's a much different assertion than "there shooul
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, marc fleury wrote:
> what do you mean we already integrate the CL stuff... for the past year or
> so...
I thought it still didn't work with reloading (if you change a
servlet class or EJB class). If I'm wrong, great!
Aaron
_
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Rickard Öberg wrote:
> Well, the mgmt yadda yadda is nice 'n all, but the big problem is still
> there: it'll run piss-poor with Tomcat. It doesn't really matter what fancy
> stuff you can think up with that crap hanging around.
>
> There, I said it, it pisses me off. The J2EE
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, marc fleury wrote:
> Since people really want to help.
>
> Any taker on a simple XML Adaptor to JMX invocations?
>
> signature="..."/>
>
> will result in a
>
> server.invoke(new ObjectName(name), method, Object[] (from args), String[]
> (from signature));
Isn't this
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Bill Burke wrote:
> The optimization would still work within the same transaction.
But it would be somewhat less useful. I mean, how often do you do
a findByPrimaryKey on an object that you've already accessed within the
same transaction?
As well, I'm still a
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Bill Burke wrote:
> Is this kludgy? Yes, but you don't have to worry about it ever not working
> unless the EJB spec changes. The EJB Spec requires that all entities of the
> same type of a finder get synchronized with the database before the finder
> executes. (See section
Just a note for people seeing problems that everyhting still
looked broken until I did a "shift-reload" and got "index.jsp" instead of
"index.html" and then magically the site started working again.
Aaron
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, marc fleury wrote:
> A big, sloppy, thank you thank you thank
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, marc fleury wrote:
> aaron...
>
> come on man...
>
>
> we all know ejx is an unfinished work... like every thing else the kid
> does...
Well, you might want to finish it by the time my book comes out...
:)
I thought there was a grand effort to unify the metada
Why did you make this a JDBC property instead of adding it as a
property of the XADataSourceLoader MBean? I think that would be the
better approach (and it avoids having to remove it before the real driver
sees it). The StatementFactory seems like a good idea; I'll take a swing
at integr
On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Bill Burke wrote:
> Aaron,
>
> You're the author of the Minerva stuff correct? Am I missing something
> or is PSCacheSize not configurable from jboss.jcml? I intend to
> implement this if it is not already implemented in source safe. BTW,
> how does one submit changes to mi
29 matches
Mail list logo
