Same for me
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mladen Turk
Sent: mercredi, 17. mai 2006 10:09
To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Fwd: Undeliverable:[JBoss-dev] *
Hi,
Can someone kick out this user ([EMAIL
BTW, Congratulations to Dimitris and the QA team for
getting there, that's great.
Cheers,
sacha
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ruel LoehrSent: lundi, 15. mai 2006 18:43To:
jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: [JBoss-dev]
Did you provide proper licensing information ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Baeyens
Sent: lundi, 8. mai 2006 14:33
To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [JBoss-dev] repository additions
Hi,
For the
Yes, congratulations to the QA team and Dimitris for his first jump in the
release-drama!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Adrian Brock
Sent: mercredi, 8. février 2006 10:46
To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re:
Hello Adrian,
This is really great, that is a much needed step for the MC usage/adoption
IMHO.
I am starting work on a prototype of the following three new
modules (I am not sure these are good names :-)
Yeah, not sure as well, but I am not sure i have great ideas at this point.
1)
and the bad news is? :)
Congratulations, that's great!
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thomas DieslerSent: mardi, 10. janvier 2006 14:57To:
Dev - JBossWS; Alexey Loubyansky; Scott M Stark; Jason T. Greene; Sacha
Labourey; Ivelin IvanovCc
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-754?page=comments#action_12312673
]
Sacha Labourey commented on JBAS-754:
-
Logged In: YES
user_id=95900
JBossHA node naming is now di-associated from JavaGroups
naming. Node name can be explicitely set
Hello Mike,
Why don't you contribute that to JBoss CVS, put it as part of the default
distrib, etc.? We have started working on a management console and I am sure
your tool would fit into it.
cheers,
sacha
View the original post :
Can you elaborate on this native IO feature? what does it handle specifically? file
access? network access?
thanks
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3850196#3850196
Reply to the post :
this is the only clean solution today, this needs to be fixed in future releases and
target should be able to contain arbitrary payload to allow for extended
load-policies.
cheers,
sacha
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3848048#3848048
Reply to
- Right-click on an entry of the tree and see a list of contextual entries you can
invoke
- lazy-load part of the tree only once you really need to open the sub-tree
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3845424#3845424
Reply to the post :
and please use a recent optimized version, like 3.2.4 or at least 3.2.3. 3.0.4 is very
old and hasn't gone through the same steps of optimisation has the 3.2.x (x3) branch.
Cheers,
sacha
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3838959#3838959
Reply to
No thorough tests?!? let me speak to your professor ;)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3835713#3835713
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3835713
-Original Message-
From: JCP-INTEREST [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harold
Ogle
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 10:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: JSR 86: Final Ballot Approved
The SE/EE Executive Committee has approved the Final Approval Ballot of:
JSR-86
complete source code ? Well, it has always been fully available on sf.net!
Furthermore, daily snapshots are available here:
http://jboss.sourceforge.net/snapshots/
Cheers,
sacha
a
href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3827359#3827359;View
the original post/a
a
And don't forget... We should really have the restart semantic in the
new state diagram ;)
-Original Message-
From: Ivelin Ivanov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2004 10:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Scott M Stark
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; The Core
Subject: Re:
That's something to modify in the jmx-console/web-console: we should
precompile JSP at build time.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 12:06 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Problems getting started ...
Hey, thanks! The JMX
To paraphrase Danch:
you _are_ joking, right?
On Behalf Of Bill Burke:
suck me
Andrew Oliver wrote:
Maybe someone can write a bug tracker module for nukes }:-)
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere
You mean SMD, right?
LOL :)
s-dev] Fwd: ASF JIRA Installation is available
suck me
Andrew Oliver wrote:
Maybe someone can write a bug tracker module for nukes }:-)
-Andy
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andrew Oliver
So I do a lot of JBoss training and when I'm not doing that
I'm working on
making JBoss a kick-ass email server so that no one ever has
to use exchange
or domino again. I often wonder what the quiet folks are
doing that is cool
Hello Rémy,
Would it be possible to switch to TC 5 for JB 3.2.4 (assuming there's
someone to test and bugfix the clustering code) ? I did add the JSR 77
stats, so the web console works and has the same stats as with TC 4.1 now.
It is not my decision but in a recent e-mail (virtual hosting)
Yes, I remember exactly:
- I know Java
- I don't know DHTML
:)
If you want to reimplement it in DTHML and check on the server side if the
browser supports it and send the appropriate version of the tree, fine!
Cheers,
sacha
- Original Message -
From: Ivelin Ivanov [EMAIL
I would qualify JMX 1.2 as a major addition, so maybe it
would be a good
idea to change the numbering scheme (3.2.3 was a minor update, 3.2.2
wasn't, and 3.2.4 isn't going to be one either).
I agree, I didn't expected the JMX 1.2 migration, that was quite a big move,
I was impressed by so
But it is already like that, no?!?
- Original Message -
From: Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jboss-Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 11:52 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] If JSR-77 stats were mbeans...
If JSR-77 stats were mbeans then we could use all the monitoring,
Some of them are already there, some not, but in 4.0 they should all be
there with easy configuration syntax:
- asych vs synch
- immediate vs time-based
- granularity: session, attribute, AOP-liked (field-based)
- transparent (or pre-defined) sub-cluster (brother-nodes) replication
(when you
balancing policy
Can you enumerate the key features of a clustered
interceptor?
--- Sacha Labourey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As part of 4.0, we have to replace the smart proxies
with clustered
interceptors, we could reuse them then.
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL
As part of 4.0, we have to replace the smart proxies with clustered
interceptors, we could reuse them then.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ivelin Ivanov
Sent: dimanche, 21. décembre 2003 18:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
- The session clustering code is now ported to Tomcat 5, but it will
likely need fixes to work.
Need help? What is the problem? Have you done some testing?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does
Is there a build-breaking competition these days?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: jeudi, 27. novembre 2003 08:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Testsuite Compilation Failed! JBoss
I get the same problem and the right-button popup never shows up. There
seems to be a platform-dependent issue on this.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Werner Ramaekers
Sent: mercredi, 26. novembre 2003 18:10
To: [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: JCP-INTEREST [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harold
Ogle
Sent: mardi, 25. novembre 2003 05:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: JSR 151: Final Release
The Expert Group for JSR-000151 Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition 1.4
has published the Final Release of
or thirdparty
changes everything is rebuilt.
Of course you can force this yourself with ./build.sh clean first.
The big problem (which probably hit Bill) is that a cvs
update doesn't pull down new jars in thirdparty.
Regards,
Adrian
Sacha Labourey wrote:
Has anything changed
Has anything changed recently? Adrian had optimized the build process a few
months ago so that rebuilding JBoss (build after build) was taking MUCH less
time and it seems this doesn't work anymore.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
Hello,
A few changes in the Tomcat HTTP Session replication code.
First, some unnecessary synchronization has been removed. This should lead
to better scalability and in some cases remove the impression that the
replication is hanging.
Second, the replication has been improved. Without using
Hello,
I've:
- backported the loadbalancer to branch 3.2 (it works great BTW!)
- added a sample test WAR to the testsuite
- created a new target in build/build.xml named hahttp-configs
Launching this target will create 3 configs that can be run on the same IP:
- http1: first web server
We already have this capability, its just a question of using
it. The hsqldb-ds.xml can reference a
classpath codebase=lib/hsql archives=hsqldb.jar/
There is no reason to add new semantics to the current
classpath element.
There are new semantics in terms of identity of classes by
Most services using the conf directory are just doing a
ClassLoader.getResource() so overriding the conf with a user
specific one means there is a directory in the classpath
search order ahead of the default. This places restrictions
Yes.
on the class loader implementation, and if you
Hello,
I would like to continue our discussion of JBoss configuration as I think we
must make that much better for future releases of JBoss.
There are lots of facets to this problem but in order to keep things simply,
I would like to start talking about a single one: user configuration of
JBoss
Will this contain the fix for the problem that occurs when doing invocation
from JacORB against Orbix as well?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Francisco Reverbel
Sent: jeudi, 6. novembre 2003 23:25
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
I think it is this one:
http://www.jacorb.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=398
Do you know if your release will include it? It seems to be part of beta 3.
Do you know what is the status of Jacorb WRT csiv2?
Cheers,
sacha
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug #398 is the same as bug #365, which has been fixed before beta 2:
http://www.jacorb.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=365
The fix is already included in the jacorb.jar library distributed
with JBoss 3.2.2.
excellent
CSIv2 is also there, but I didn't test it yet. We should try it
I have the same problem.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dimitris Andreadis
Sent: vendredi, 7. novembre 2003 17:10
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Check out problem
Hi,
I'm trying to do a fresh checkout of HEAD
Bill
Sacha Labourey wrote:
This is because you consider the system services as dirt.
If you consider it
as the system, putting that in a system folder makes sense.
Remember 2.4.x?
the deploy was empty and that was great from a user
point of view
FYI
-Original Message-
From: JCP-INTEREST [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harold
Ogle
Sent: jeudi, 30. octobre 2003 00:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: JSR 94: Proposed Final Draft
The Proposed Final Draft Specification for
JSR-94 Java Rule Engine API
is now available
FYI
-Original Message-
From: JCP-INTEREST [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harold
Ogle
Sent: mardi, 28. octobre 2003 22:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: JSR 86: Proposed Final Draft
The Proposed Final Draft Specification for
JSR-86 Enterprise Media Beans
is now
there is a 22 hours latency between CVS commits and the CVS message on the
ML..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sacha Labourey
Sent: vendredi, 24 octobre 2003 14:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [jboss-cvs]
contrib/varia/src
.
Sacha Labourey wrote:
Is that possible it comes from a recent change? I have a
strange issue like
that in 3.0.8 as well: some of the container references
seems to be already
gone inside the destroy call.
---
This SF.net email
Use ulimit -n, AND MAKE SURE that it is set globally (for all shells) OR
put it in the run.sh file otherwise the risk is that:
- you set it in your current shell
- you launch run.sh
- run.sh overrides your ulimit value (see run.sh file)
Cheers,
Sacha
-Original
Is that possible it comes from a recent change? I have a strange issue like
that in 3.0.8 as well: some of the container references seems to be already
gone inside the destroy call.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of SourceForge.net
FYI, 791439 is not critical, works for all usual scenarios so I will
personnaly not fix it for 3.2.2.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Adrian Brock
Sent: vendredi, 10. octobre 2003 15:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Laurent is our new bug-report serial-killer!!! ;)
That's great, thanks! I did it once, it was good to close all these cases!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
SourceForge.net
Sent: vendredi, 10. octobre 2003 17:52
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Is it really useful to have all that SNMP logging information as part of the
default logging level in the console in 3.2.2? It is really verbose and
pops-up whenever a new JBoss instance starts on the network.
Cheers,
Sacha
BTW, it is in the console/src/main/org/JBoss/console/ folder
Yes, look at the EJB for example.
Are there any plugins in the build now that exemplify
this concept ?
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek
]
Are there any plugins in the build now that exemplify
this concept ?
--- Sacha Labourey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes.
In the web-console, we have both the existing jmx
view and the J2EE-oriented
view. We must create all plugins for the J2EE
oriented view and once the
JBoss deployment
Are there any management/administration GUI projects
started ? (Other than web-console...)
No, but everything is there and it is easy to write plugins to manage JMS,
WARs, etc. It would be good if someone could spend some time writing small
plugins for the parts of JBoss.
Are there any management/administration GUI projects
started ? (Other than web-console...)
No, but everything is there and it is easy to write plugins to manage JMS,
WARs, etc. It would be good if someone could spend some time writing small
plugins for the parts of JBoss.
mean plugins for web-console ? So that
when a plugin is available for a
specific node in the tree, it would be loaded in
addition to or instead of the jmx-console content ?
Just trying to get an idea of what you visualize.
--- Sacha Labourey [EMAIL PROTECTED
But the snapshots are ok BTW
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Adrian Brock
Sent: dimanche, 28. septembre 2003 15:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] nightly test job vs build tests
There is a delay of ~24 hours on
To solve some bugs in 3.2.2rc4, I have to switch to jgroups (for 3.2 and
4.0, not 3.0), this will imply quite many changes as the name of the JG
files change as well.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
While switching from javagroups to jgroups, I receive this message now when
starting JBoss, do you know why? It use the default JB stack
15:20:56,812 ERROR [ClusterPartition] Initialization failed
ChannelException: JChannel(): java.lang.Exception:
Configurator.sanityCheck(): event
exception wrap the source Exception/Error
and allow attachement of arbitrary payload.
Cheers,
Sacha
xxx
Sacha Labourey
General Manager
JBoss Group (Europe) SàRL
xxx
That's great, thank you Dimitris and Spyros.
Cheers,
sacha
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dimitris Andreadis
Sent: lundi, 15. septembre 2003 09:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] New module at Branch_3_2 - SNMP
I guess it is possible to remove a tag, and then make a branch, but I am not
an expert...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Adrian Brock
Sent: mardi, 16. septembre 2003 17:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev]
There is no such compatibility anyway. Or you simply do an Invocation2 and
have the server accept both but this will create legacy code that is not
very useful.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: vendredi, 12.
I agree, compatibility has already been broken between minor 3.2.x versions,
so if it allows us to have 20% improvement, I would say: GO! The thinking
about compatibility should occur before, not after and requires the
establishment of more serious and stable rules (version_id, etc.)s
This seems to be great:
http://ejbca.sourceforge.net/
EJBCA is a fully functional Certificate Authority. Based on J2EE technology
it constitutes a robust, high performance and component based CA. Both
flexible and platform independent, EJBCA can be used standalone or
integrated in any
- a new Unix wrapper (we use it for the usual port-80-without-root
problem; it unfortunately wouldn't work with JB, which doesn't have a
well defined init phase)
***
Explain ;)
Cheers,
Sacha
I have to admit that I've decided, long time ago, to have a empty secret
passphrase for my CVS account... Never type a password, simply commit ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: jeudi, 28. août 2003 23:44
To: Private
Shouldn't we remove the default topics/queues from deploy by default? It is
used only by the testsuite right?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT
]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Default destinations
It is useful to have one or two examples. Maybe commented out.
-=Ivelin=-
- Original Message -
From: Sacha Labourey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 1:34 AM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Default
Right, now, there is no such naming service thing, but it may interesting in
the future for some features requiring to name nodes of the cluster. In the
meantime, I will use the IP-ified name as this logical name and never change
it, even after a shun.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I think that shouldn't be too much of a problem as it is based on the
framework whose interfaces haven't changed between 3.2.1 and 3.2.2.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: mardi, 12 août 2003 23:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sacha Labourey
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 11:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Cluster aware Scheduler
I think that shouldn't be too much of a problem as it is
based on the framework whose interfaces haven't
it, let's move that to the online forums at
http://www.jboss.org/forum.jsp?forum=91
x
Sacha Labourey
General Manager
JBoss Group (Europe) SàRL
x
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built
Yes, this is correct.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Scott M Stark
Sent: mercredi, 6. août 2003 17:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Interface or protocol between JBoss
and its clustering framework
So far
Hello Bela,
Yes, but Scott found two interesting things:
- it seems that even if two nodes share the same view, the name of the
members of the view may appear different (one has the name, the other the IP
address)
- there is an unstable condition somewhere that make the singleton service
I will work on that, thanks for the complete report.
Cheers,
Sacha
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Scott M Stark
Sent: lundi, 4. août 2003 00:59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev]
Hello,
Is that intended or a bug that in JSR-77, the EAR never has any sub-modules
listed (always empty).
Cheers,
Sacha
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers Consultants:
: [JBoss-dev] JSR-77: EAR sub-modules?
Must be a bug. I'll look at this tomorrow when I look into some other
jsr-77 issues.
--
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Sacha Labourey wrote:
Hello,
Is that intended
Sorry but the reloaded brand is already used by another JBoss project
managed by Thomas Aardal to allow old JBoss client jars to be used with
newer JBoss releases ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: lundi, 16.
Hello,
Sacha,
I note that you have made some changes to
jetty/src/main/org/mortbay/jetty/servlet/AbstractSessionManage
r.java et alia
on Branch_3_2, to support statistics retrieval.
Yes.
This is just to remind you that, whilst a copy of Jetty cvs
is kept in
JBoss cvs (Marc asked
st is not very clean
Sacha Labourey wrote:
User: slaboure
Date: 03/06/05 06:26:17
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/deployment Tag: Branch_3_2
DeploymentSorter.java SubDeployerSupport.java
Log:
Add features that allows to have JAR (dir or file) deployment
Hello Fred,
Could you please let me know the advance of this project? I am interested in
it and willing to help setting up the environment.
Cheers,
Sacha
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Fred Hartman
Sent:
5.9
AIX 4.3
AIX 5.1L
HP-UX 11i
HP-UX 11
We would also like to extend the test result archive to
include results of
testsuite execution using other DBMSes and JMS providers.
-Fred
-Original Message-
From: Sacha Labourey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday
I talked with Dr Jung yesterday, the Webservices part is going pretty well
but JAXR is 70% there and W2EE is still 80% to go (but easy) (Dr. Jung's
words)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dain Sundstrom
Sent: vendredi, 4. avril 2003
Where is the attached file?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of SourceForge.net
Sent: jeudi, 3. avril 2003 19:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-714762 ] Adding
Instrumentation Processing Support to JBoss
You are talking about a primary-partition approach. The
literature tells
you to shut down members in a non-primary partitions. It is simple to
implement, all right. But it reduces overall availability of a
distributed system, that's why there are many approaches
beyond primary
I had a dream! That one day, babelfish will be able to understand AND
TRANSLATE Peter songs.
Nice try Adrian, but you've abandonned on the last part! ;)
like a
iteration of min 1k for a deploy/undeploy repeted test
for thejbossteam
ploy deploy ... resulting in a non mem fatigue - then
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.2
/doc/jk/workershowto.html
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk2/release/v2.0.
2/doc/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Felipe
Don't worry if you don't understand Peter's posts, it is like American music
for French people: just something you have to listen and enjoy, without
understanding the words. Peter is somehow jboss-dev's official poet.
Make... letters play and ! Ho here a dot playing with a ^column. Klafuti,
Hello Bela,
Yes, we need some kind of policy. But I thought about something a little bit
different. In fact, there is already a way for services that have state to
know about partition merging and plug into it. Instead I thought about a
policy where you can receive events when you are no more on
to see what kind of
performance boost we
could get.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Sacha
Labourey
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 1:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] hsqldb options
Did you take
to
documentation as they are not obvious and there can be a lot
of people
living, as I did before, in paradise, where all the mess with state
merging, is handled by clustering framework.
Greet's
David
Sacha Labourey wrote:
Maybe that's one of the points. As I understand partion
split
Well, for quick prototyping it is nice to use the persistent version which
allows to use JBossMQ for example and restart JBoss without loosing
persistent messages.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Scott M Stark
Sent: samedi, 29. mars
Did you take a look at McKoi? http://www.mckoi.com/database/
From the DOC:
=
There are four transaction isolation levels defined by the SQL standard.
Each isolation level provides varying degrees of protection from seeing
changes made by concurrent connections. The Mckoi database
Disagree.
Consider following:
1. Cluster running banking application with SFSB's
Ok.
2. Cluster is split into two groups
ok
3. Each group continues concurently previous computation
You mean: you may have work in progress for a given set of SFSB on each node
(each node being on a
IMPRESSIVE BILL! Congratulations! Not only does this is impressive, but it
is ridiculously EASY to use.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: jeudi, 27. mars 2003 01:09
To: Jboss-Dev
Subject: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned
You can subscribe to merge events if you want to implement the merging
yourself i.e. if you use the clustering framework for your own mbeans.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Klimek
Sent: jeudi, 27. mars 2003 12:36
To: [EMAIL
Changing the concurrent number of thread allowed for JBossWeb: 100 was way
to small!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lennart Petersson
Sent: jeudi, 27. mars 2003 16:48
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] NUKES on JBoss
Hi, thank's for answering. Yes I'm using clustering framwork and
membershipChangedDuringMerge, but I didn't find any correct
alghorithm
how to choose value for conflicting keys. (e.g. Timestamping)
I hoped that I would find this idea in source code for
DistributedStateService but as I
1 - 100 of 558 matches
Mail list logo
