The AspectDeployer comes with the jboss-aspects-beta2-for324.zip package. If the WIKI
were up, I would be able to give you online directions. I believe the
jboss-aop-beta2.zip has directions embedded within it though.
Bill
View the original post :
Yeah, I am already using the jboss-aspects package.
- I placed the jboss-aspects.jar into the default/lib directory
- I placed the base-aop.xml into the default/conf directory.
I can see in the Jmx-console the AspectManager and AsepectDeployer -- so I am assuming
that they have been deployed.
You downloaded the 324 jar? not the plain jboss-aspect.jar correct?
Thanks for the -report bug. I'll look into it.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3835837#3835837
Reply to the post :
Bill Burke wrote : You downloaded the 324 jar? not the plain jboss-aspect.jar
correct?
|
| Thanks for the -report bug. I'll look into it.
Yep, I did. So, at this point, should my stuff be working, and something is amiss --
or am *I* doing something wrong?
View the original post :
Looking at the code for the AspectDeployer that was in the 3.2.4 package -- the
accpept() methid only returns true if it is passed a file that ends with .aop.
I renamed the example.zip to example.aop, and the error didn't happen. So I am
assuming that is it.
I tried changing my file into a
webconsole support for AOP has not been backported to 3.2 series yet. I didn't have
time, sorry.
Did that doco not make it clear that files needed to be named .aop? When the wiki
comes back up, i'll check.
Thanks for your patience.
Bill
View the original post :
the webconsole AOP stuff has not been ported to 3.2.4. You could turn on verbosity
of AOP. In AspectManagerService mbean set Verbose attribute to true. I belive the
doco has info on that as well.
View the original post :
Thanks for all the help -- and I blew it. The documentation for the Running Inside
JBoss mentions at the top about it having to be .aop file -- but since it was inside
the 4.0 block, and no the 3.2.4, I never even looked at it.
Sorry about that!
Keep up the good work!
View the original post
Bill Burke wrote : webconsole support for AOP has not been backported to 3.2 series
yet. I didn't have time, sorry.
|
| Did that doco not make it clear that files needed to be named .aop? When the wiki
comes back up, i'll check.
|
| Thanks for your patience.
|
| Bill
|
I
