[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: Is anyone using TreeCache in production?

2004-06-22 Thread idumali
Wooow. Very impressive performance improvement. Thanks a lot, Ben! View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3839522#3839522 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3839522

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: Is anyone using TreeCache in production?

2004-06-21 Thread bwang00
OK. I have fixed the performance bottleneck problem in LRUPolicy. I replaced the eviction queue from BoundLinkedQueue to BoundedBuffer. I have also increased the initial capacity of the queue. Eventually, we will externalize the initial capacity in the next full release. I have run the example

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: Is anyone using TreeCache in production?

2004-06-18 Thread bwang00
Hi, Thank you very much for all efforts. This is valuable information for me to troubleshoot. Just one quick question. What is the log level for org.jboss.cache? DEBUG or INFO? Default shipped with the package is DEBUG and that may have signicant impact on the overall performance. Cheers,

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: Is anyone using TreeCache in production?

2004-06-18 Thread mikheil
Hi Ben, In the tests above the log level was INFO. You can find the log4j.properties in the zip file that irakli has posted, under src directory. Mikheil View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3839284#3839284 Reply to the post :

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: Is anyone using TreeCache in production?

2004-06-18 Thread bwang00
Mikheil, Thanks for the info. I will take a look. -Ben View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3839288#3839288 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3839288

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: Is anyone using TreeCache in production?

2004-06-17 Thread bwang00
Regarding to performance, SYNC mode has to be slower than ASYNC since it is blocking. But if you have read-mostly data, then it can be acceptable. Otherwise, use ASYNC if you can. For LRU, basically there is a TimerTask thread that wake up every x seconds to check for the node event queue. Do

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: Is anyone using TreeCache in production?

2004-06-17 Thread idumali
hi Ben, thanks for replying. here's a graph of LRU-enabled test benchmark. The only thing it does is makes put()s in JBossCache. Test is a standalone app, no interference with anything, no Hibernate or whatever. This snapshot is with wakeUpTime=5sec

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: Is anyone using TreeCache in production?

2004-06-16 Thread idumali
We (www.digijava.org) are trying to use JbossCache under Hibernate on production. Only ASYNC replication gave reasonable performance. Number of caches objects that we are testing on is about hundred thousand objects We are having real serious problems with the existing LRU implementation. LRU

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: Is anyone using TreeCache in production?

2004-03-04 Thread jasong
Excellent, we are just starting to use TreeCache this week (as a second level cache for hibernate). We are still in early development phases, and we were hoping it would be production ready by the time we hit rollout (several months from now). Keep up the good work! -Jason a

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: Is anyone using TreeCache in production?

2004-03-03 Thread bwang00
To answer part of your question. We are scheduled to have a 1.0 release in middle of this month. Bugs fixes and new features such as eviction policy and aop object graphs handling. On the aop side, it will also use the latest JBossAop that Bill has been working on. I will be interested to hear