Re: [JBoss-dev] DTD versioning

2002-08-19 Thread David Jencks
If you have a minute to do this in that would be wonderful. thanks david jencks On 2002.08.19 10:43:58 -0400 Michael Bartmann wrote: > By the way: > Shouldnt we commit your changes to deployment sorting (ds.xml anr rar > earlier) from > DeploymentSorter in HEAD (rev1.6) to Branch_3_2 also? > >

Re: [JBoss-dev] DTD versioning

2002-08-19 Thread Michael Bartmann
By the way: Shouldnt we commit your changes to deployment sorting (ds.xml anr rar earlier) from DeploymentSorter in HEAD (rev1.6) to Branch_3_2 also? Enjoy, Michael --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell p

Re: [JBoss-dev] DTD versioning

2002-08-19 Thread David Jencks
Keep it at 1_0 I think. Neither branch has actually been released yet;-) Thanks for writing this and I'm glad you can commit it now!! david jencks On 2002.08.19 07:43:26 -0400 Michael Bartmann wrote: > Hi, > last week (before gaining cvs-write-privilege) I submitted > a patch (nr. 595176) whic

[JBoss-dev] DTD versioning

2002-08-19 Thread Michael Bartmann
Hi, last week (before gaining cvs-write-privilege) I submitted a patch (nr. 595176) which allows you to use no-tx-datasources via xsl-deployment. I would really like to commit this into Branch_3_2 and HEAD, and everything is obviously upwards-compatible. But: should the upwards-compatible DTD sta