Re: [JBoss-dev] JAWS -Single Datasource

2001-06-27 Thread Vinay Menon
Yes! Guess it should figure in the training course! Vinay - Original Message - From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 3:30 PM Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JAWS -Single Datasource > |Nonetheless, it would be g

RE: [JBoss-dev] JAWS -Single Datasource

2001-06-25 Thread Jason Dillon
> Distributed transaction is another ball game altogether, but what he is > asking for doesn't necessarily require that. Also he has been through my > training and he knows that distributed transactions are bad mkey? What do you mean by mkey? Can you explain this more or do I need to take your

Re: [JBoss-dev] JAWS -Single Datasource

2001-06-25 Thread Dain Sundstrom
riginal Message - From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 9:30 AM Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JAWS -Single Datasource > |Nonetheless, it would be great if the new CMP stuff will be able to > |support multiple datasource

RE: [JBoss-dev] JAWS -Single Datasource

2001-06-25 Thread marc fleury
he wrote it. |> |> regards |> marcf |> |> |-Original Message- |> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of danch |> |Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 11:58 PM |> |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JAWS -Single Datasource |&g

Re: [JBoss-dev] JAWS -Single Datasource

2001-06-25 Thread Vinay Menon
help on that code, he wrote it. > > regards > marcf > > |-Original Message- > |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of danch > |Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 11:58 PM > |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JAWS -Single Data

RE: [JBoss-dev] JAWS -Single Datasource

2001-06-24 Thread marc fleury
(I am surprised it is not there yet). Talk to sebastien if you need help on that code, he wrote it. regards marcf |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of danch |Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 11:58 PM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: Re: [JBoss-de

Re: [JBoss-dev] JAWS -Single Datasource

2001-06-24 Thread danch
Dain Sundstrom wrote: > No reason to tie an entire jar to a single datasource. I'll check my code > to see if it can support multiple datasources, although I don't think it > will work with most DBs. This would require the DBs to natively support > JDBC 2.0 XA transactions, and if I remember mo

Re: [JBoss-dev] JAWS -Single Datasource

2001-06-24 Thread Dain Sundstrom
;t have 2-phase commit drivers yet. -dain - Original Message - From: "danch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 9:58 PM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JAWS -Single Datasource > No reason, really. Enter it as a feature request. If

Re: [JBoss-dev] JAWS -Single Datasource

2001-06-24 Thread danch
No reason, really. Enter it as a feature request. If you've time, post a patch, but look at Dain's 2.0 CMP stuff first -danch Vinay Menon wrote: > Hello, > > Is there any specific reason why the tag needs to be > applicable to the entire JAWS xml? This would mean that all the beans >

[JBoss-dev] JAWS -Single Datasource

2001-06-24 Thread Vinay Menon
Hello,   Is there any specific reason why the tag needs to be applicable to the entire JAWS xml? This would mean that all the beans essentially tie to the same datasource i.e. database and need splitting up of the application into smaller units with their own separate deployement descriptors.