David,
Maybe you can give me a hand with this; the deployment code is very
confusing to me. I currently have the following phases in deployment:
1) create: create the entities and resolves relationships (each side
checks to see of the other side exists yet, so the second one to deploy
]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 7:26 PM
To: Dain Sundstrom; jboss-dev
Subject: [JBoss-dev] cmp2 relations, mbeans, and the testsuite
For me, 3.0.1 head testsuite is failing all the cmp2 tests with
relationships. I think this is due to Scott's recent changes to the
content of some create
, June 06, 2002 7:26 PM
To: Dain Sundstrom; jboss-dev
Subject:[JBoss-dev] cmp2 relations, mbeans, and the testsuite
For me, 3.0.1 head testsuite is failing all the cmp2 tests with
relationships. I think this is due to Scott's recent changes to the
content of some create and start
between the lines...
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 1:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] cmp2 relations, mbeans, and the testsuite
On 2002.06.07 03:03:41 -0400 Vesco Claudio wrote:
Hi!
I
-
From: Vesco Claudio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 12:03 AM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] cmp2 relations, mbeans, and the testsuite
Hi!
I think, I have corrected this problem in HEAD. But until now I haven't
, 2002 1:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] cmp2 relations, mbeans, and the testsuite
On 2002.06.07 03:03:41 -0400 Vesco Claudio wrote:
Hi!
I think, I have corrected this problem in HEAD.
Yes. I ported it back to 3.0. As far as I can tell it mostly reverts
scott's
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [JBoss-dev] cmp2 relations, mbeans, and the
testsuite
On 2002.06.07 03:03:41 -0400 Vesco Claudio wrote:
Hi!
I think, I have corrected this problem in HEAD.
Yes. I ported it back to 3.0. As far as I can tell it mostly reverts
scott's changes
For me, 3.0.1 head testsuite is failing all the cmp2 tests with
relationships. I think this is due to Scott's recent changes to the
content of some create and start methods, although I haven't reverted the
changes to make sure.
I propose that we manage the dependencies between a relationship
