this question bothers me for quite sometime nowis
it true that if i want to have fk in compound pk, i need to ditch the cmr field
for the fkso no fkrelationshipcan bemaintained (e.g.
even the fk does notexsist as a pk incoresponding table, and
container managed cascade delete wont be
expect to write code 3 times) I plan on supporting the interesting fk
mappings.
-dain
-Original Message-From: Ken Chang
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:49
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
[JBoss-dev] fk in compound pk
this question bothers me
Sundstrom
To: 'Ken Chang' ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:13
PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] fk in compound
pk
The
problem has to do with the EJB spec. The spec says that the pk must be
set in the ejbCreate method and then can't be changed. The spec
the interesting fk
mappings.
-dain
-Original Message-
From: Ken Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] fk in compound pk
this question bothers me for quite sometime now
is it true that if i want