another thought:
is anybody aware of the adavntages of xsd instead of using dtd's ?
somebody is then able to use xsl for changing the underlying metadata
(i.e. jboss.xsd - xslt - jboss-ejb-jar.xsd - xslt -
any-believeable.xsd - xslt - my-prefered.xml).
Am Don, 2002-02-28 um 02.58 schrieb Jason
I haven't had any problems using xsl without xsd, and am planning to rework
the jboss deployment process based on extensive use of xsl transformations,
so in particular it would be very easy (supply an xsl script) to deploy
stuff using your own in -house dd dtd or ???.
It looks to me as if xsd
Are you saying there is a tool that from grammar transformations will
generate document transformations?
g1.xsd transformed to g2.xsd via t1.xsl
tool generates t2.xsl that will transform
d1.xml complying with g1 to d2.xsl complying with g2?
Without this I don't really see the point of your
Am Don, 2002-02-28 um 16.51 schrieb David Jencks:
Are you saying there is a tool that from grammar transformations will
generate document transformations?
not a tool, a xslt
g1.xsd transformed to g2.xsd via t1.xsl
there must be a g0.xsd wich contains the rules for g1.xsd and g2.xsd -
this
Quick idea. Use jboss-ejb-jar.xml instead of jboss.xml to avoid
confusion with other jboss xml config files...
--jason
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
: [JBoss-dev] jboss.xml vs. jboss-ejb-jar.xml
Quick idea. Use jboss-ejb-jar.xml instead of jboss.xml to avoid
confusion with other jboss xml config files...
--jason
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net
David's got an even better idea
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
|Dillon
|Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 4:29 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] jboss.xml vs. jboss-ejb-jar.xml
|
|
|Quick idea. Use jboss
]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
| Dillon
| Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 7:29 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: [JBoss-dev] jboss.xml vs. jboss-ejb-jar.xml
|
|
| Quick idea. Use jboss-ejb-jar.xml instead of jboss.xml to avoid
| confusion with other jboss xml config files
]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
|Dillon
|Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 4:29 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] jboss.xml vs. jboss-ejb-jar.xml
|
|
|Quick idea. Use jboss-ejb-jar.xml instead of jboss.xml to avoid
|confusion with other jboss xml config files
it the same.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
Dillon
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 7:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] jboss.xml vs. jboss-ejb-jar.xml
Quick idea. Use jboss-ejb-jar.xml instead of jboss.xml to avoid
It not about waiting or not. Shit man. I just had a thought and wanted
to let it out. No need to be so abrasive either.
--jason
marc fleury wrote:
|I believe that his idea would still require a JBoss specific dd, but I
so does yours, mother fucker.
|could be wrong. Once that work
just teasing
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: Jason Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 5:58 PM
|To: marc fleury
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss.xml vs. jboss-ejb-jar.xml
|
|
|It not about waiting or not. Shit man. I just had
12 matches
Mail list logo
