Reverbel; Bill Burke
Cc: Jboss-Dev
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ProxyFactory/JRMPInvoker needs redesign?
|whatever.) This is crucial: proxy factories and invokers must
|know each other!!! The container, however, should not know
|any of them.
Invokers register in the registry under
|same JNDI name. What I'm saying is that I think beans need to be able to
|control what JNDI names are bound to what transport.
This is exactly what I am saying as well.
Look you are the one implementing (supposedly) so just go ahead and do what
you want.
This is bla bla on my part.
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Francisco Reverbel
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 8:37 PM
To: Bill Burke
Cc: marc fleury; Jboss-Dev
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ProxyFactory/JRMPInvoker needs redesign?
Things are getting clearer
Ok, I'll reread your bla bla. Sorry I misinterpreted.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:35 AM
To: Bill Burke; Francisco Reverbel
Cc: Jboss-Dev
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ProxyFactory/JRMPInvoker needs redesign
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, marc fleury wrote:
|But we don't have an abstract EJB/ProxyFactory...
my point is that we could... at least for the java client parts
Yes, I understand you clearly today.
|The EJB/JRMP/ProxyFactory does not care about the IIOP invoker.
|And the EJB/IIOP/ProxyFactory
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, marc fleury wrote:
|A proxy factory is tied to an invoker. See?
no, only IIOP,
Well, this is not fully accurate.
only IIOP because IIOP doesnt generate java clients but IORs... the PF I
talk about generate java clients with abstracted invokers. In fact one per
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Bill Burke wrote:
Makes sense. I think I know how to implement this. Do you all mind giving
me some time to implement it? Let's say until April 1 since I'm going to be
at JBoss One?
Sure.
Right now, for configuration, I'm going to assume in jboss.xml that you have
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Bill Burke wrote:
... [big snip]
The IIOP Proxy Factory for
instance, will probably not deal with client interceptors because it will
probably be passing back a CORBA Object reference to the client rather than
a serialized Java Proxy class.
Precisely.
The good
This is the last piece of the puzzle,
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
|Burke
|Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:59 PM
|To: Jboss-Dev
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] ProxyFactory/JRMPInvoker needs redesign?
|
|
|Hey,
|
|Jason made a good
-Original Message-
From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:02 PM
To: Bill Burke; Jboss-Dev
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ProxyFactory/JRMPInvoker needs redesign?
This is the last piece of the puzzle,
Not the last piece. Still need multiple
this stuff make sense to you guys?
Cheers,
Francisco
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Bill Burke wrote:
-Original Message-
From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:02 PM
To: Bill Burke; Jboss-Dev
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ProxyFactory/JRMPInvoker
2002, Bill Burke wrote:
|
|
|
| -Original Message-
| From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:02 PM
| To: Bill Burke; Jboss-Dev
| Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ProxyFactory/JRMPInvoker needs redesign?
|
|
| This is the last piece of the puzzle
]]
| Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:02 PM
| To: Bill Burke; Jboss-Dev
| Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ProxyFactory/JRMPInvoker needs redesign?
|
|
| This is the last piece of the puzzle,
|
|
|
| Not the last piece. Still need multiple invokers to one containerBut
| we're getting
Burke wrote:
|
|
|
| -Original Message-
| From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:02 PM
| To: Bill Burke; Jboss-Dev
| Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ProxyFactory/JRMPInvoker needs redesign?
|
|
| This is the last piece of the puzzle
guys?
| |
| |Cheers,
| |
| |Francisco
| |
| |On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Bill Burke wrote:
| |
| |
| |
| | -Original Message-
| | From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| | Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:02 PM
| | To: Bill Burke; Jboss-Dev
| | Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ProxyFactory
Of marc
|fleury
|Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 6:52 PM
|To: Francisco Reverbel
|Cc: Bill Burke; Jboss-Dev
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ProxyFactory/JRMPInvoker needs redesign?
|
|
||But we don't have an abstract EJB/ProxyFactory...
|
|my point is that we could... at least for the java client parts
|A proxy factory is tied to an invoker. See?
no, only IIOP,
only IIOP because IIOP doesnt generate java clients but IORs... the PF I
talk about generate java clients with abstracted invokers. In fact one per
available invoker.
These can generate JRMP/ClusteredJRMP/WebServices/JMS/ enabled
17 matches
Mail list logo
