A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: [JBoss-dev] more jmx domain structure
I just finished commiting this. I was unable to change the
'SingleJBoss' or the 'JMImplementation' domains, so I left them as
they
were. I don't know where the later even gets set. I tried
Does this mean that there are hard-coded references
between mbeans? I
think it would be a good idea to convert these to
depends elements in the
mbean configuration (formerly mbean-ref elements) to
make these
dependencies more explicit. What do you think?
Good and bad, don't make it a
PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: [JBoss-dev] more jmx domain structure
I just finished commiting this. I was unable to change the
'SingleJBoss' or the 'JMImplementation' domains, so I left them as they
were. I don't know where the later even gets set. I tried changing
SingleJBoss
to or want to change those.
...
--jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of marc fleury
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 6:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] more jmx domain structure
Does this mean
on 04-01-2 23.28, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would not expect users to have to or want to change those.
I think this defines well the semantic func going on ...
I am a user ( proud user, that is ( ... ) ( so are U ( ...( proud that is )
) ) ... ) ... I am a dev ... I am I ...
Yah that's it... or not... can't really tell. I have no clue what this
means.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Peter Fagerlund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 7:03 PM
To: Jason Dillon; 'marc fleury';
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] more jmx
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of marc fleury
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 6:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] more jmx domain structure
Does this mean that there are hard-coded references
between mbeans? I
, January 02, 2002 8:25 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] more jmx domain structure
I just finished commiting this. I was unable to change the
'SingleJBoss' or the 'JMImplementation' domains, so I left them as they
were. I don't know where the later even gets set. I tried changing
SingleJBoss
Hi,
JMImplementation is part of the JMX spec and is
created by the MBeanServer.
Regards,
Adrian
__
View this jboss-dev thread in the online forums:
http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66thread=5570
, January 02, 2002 8:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] more jmx domain structure
On 2002.01.02 23:25:43 -0500 Jason Dillon wrote:
I just finished commiting this. I was unable to change the
'SingleJBoss' or the 'JMImplementation' domains, so I left them as
they
were. I don't know
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] more jmx domain structure
On 2002.01.02 23:25:43 -0500 Jason Dillon wrote:
I just finished commiting this. I was unable to change the
'SingleJBoss' or the 'JMImplementation' domains, so I left them
I'm sure I'm being naive, but why can't you add a depends
attribute/object
name valued property for each one? I would think finding them all
would
be
the hard part.
There are some components which are not directly controlled by
configuration and/or have static fields which hold the object
.
Happy new year.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Bill Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:21 PM
To: Jason Dillon; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] more jmx domain structure
Excellent idea.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
really tried to update all names so it
might just work.
Happy new year.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Bill Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:21 PM
To: Jason Dillon; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] more jmx domain structure
Perhaps once Marc's changes are commited we can look into make this a
reality.
--jason
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Bill Burke wrote:
Excellent idea.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
Dillon
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001
15 matches
Mail list logo
