Re: [JBoss-dev] Ave Caesar, morituri te salutant (fwd)

2001-12-22 Thread Adam Heath
-- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 11:19:57 -0600 (CST) From: Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Ave Caesar, morituri te salutant On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, marc fleury wrote: So I feel inspired

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbosstest/src/resources/cmp2/ejbselect/META-INF - New directory

2001-12-22 Thread Dain Sundstrom
User: dsundstrom Date: 01/12/21 10:42:07 jbosstest/src/resources/cmp2/ejbselect/META-INF - New directory ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/cmp2/ejbselect - New directory

2001-12-22 Thread Dain Sundstrom
User: dsundstrom Date: 01/12/21 10:43:24 jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/cmp2/ejbselect - New directory ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

[JBoss-dev] Re: J2EE 1.3 app dtd

2001-12-22 Thread marc fleury
Give us a patch and then another one and I give you rw __ View this jboss-dev thread in the online forums: http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66thread=6153 ___ Jboss-development

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-495955 ] Don't rollback an autocommit connection

2001-12-22 Thread noreply
Patches item #495955, was opened at 2001-12-21 12:07 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=495955group_id=22866 Category: JBossCX Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Richard Kilgore (richard-kilgore)

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-495959 ] race conditions in ObjectPool

2001-12-22 Thread noreply
Patches item #495959, was opened at 2001-12-21 12:23 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=495959group_id=22866 Category: JBossCX Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Richard Kilgore (richard-kilgore)

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/javax/management ObjectName.java

2001-12-22 Thread Trevor Squires
User: squirest Date: 01/12/21 12:56:39 Modified:src/main/javax/management ObjectName.java Log: bugfix in illegal character detection Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +22 -3 jmx/src/main/javax/management/ObjectName.java Index: ObjectName.java

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/compliance/objectname MalformedSUITE.java ObjectNameSUITE.java MalformedTEST.java

2001-12-22 Thread Trevor Squires
User: squirest Date: 01/12/21 13:16:44 Modified:src/main/test/compliance/objectname ObjectNameSUITE.java Added: src/main/test/compliance/objectname MalformedSUITE.java Removed: src/main/test/compliance/objectname MalformedTEST.java Log: refactored and improved

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/compliance/registration/support RegistrationAware.java RegistrationAwareMBean.java

2001-12-22 Thread Trevor Squires
User: squirest Date: 01/12/21 14:00:49 Added: src/main/test/compliance/registration/support RegistrationAware.java RegistrationAwareMBean.java Log: support classes for MBeanRegistration related tests Revision ChangesPath 1.1

RE: [JBoss-dev] Threading of transactions

2001-12-22 Thread Bill Burke
I don't think you can guarantee one thread per transaction. What's your concern? The locking mechanisms should work if there is more than one thread per transaction. Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dain Sundstrom Sent:

Re: [JBoss-dev] Threading of transactions

2001-12-22 Thread marc fleury
Is it true that a transaction will only have one thread running at a time? I am really only concerned about threads in the container. no it is not. We have gone through this with Rickard already and he went and found the spec part that says you can have many threads running in a

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: thirdparty/mortbay/jetty3extra/lib org.mortbay.jetty.jmx.jar

2001-12-22 Thread Jules Gosnell
User: jules_gosnell Date: 01/12/21 15:00:17 Modified:mortbay/jetty3extra/lib org.mortbay.jetty.jmx.jar Log: sync mortbay jars with Jetty cvs Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +88 -94thirdparty/mortbay/jetty3extra/lib/org.mortbay.jetty.jmx.jar Binary file

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: thirdparty/mortbay/jetty/lib javax.servlet.jar org.apache.jasper.jar org.mortbay.jetty.jar

2001-12-22 Thread Jules Gosnell
User: jules_gosnell Date: 01/12/21 15:00:17 Modified:mortbay/jetty/lib javax.servlet.jar org.apache.jasper.jar org.mortbay.jetty.jar Log: sync mortbay jars with Jetty cvs Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +81 -81

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2001-12-22 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 145 Successful tests: 136 Errors:6 Failures: 3 [time of test: 22 December 2001 10:30 GMT] [java.version:

RE: [JBoss-dev] Threading of transactions

2001-12-22 Thread Dain Sundstrom
This is what I wanted to hear. I don't care about only one thread, I am just concerned about having only one running thread. I am adding an application level transaction data private to the cmp plugin, so I need to know if I need to synchronize access to the tx data. This is similar to thread

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss org.jboss.Shutdown does not work

2001-12-22 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE Hello, The org.jboss.Shutdown class does

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2001-12-22 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 216 Successful tests: 202 Errors:11 Failures: 3 [time of test: 22 December 2001 11:36 GMT] [java.version:

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2001-12-22 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 145 Successful tests: 136 Errors:6 Failures: 3 [time of test: 22 December 2001 15:45 GMT] [java.version:

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss org.jboss.Shutdown does not work

2001-12-22 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE Hello, The org.jboss.Shutdown class does

Re: RE: [JBoss-dev] Threading of transactions

2001-12-22 Thread marc fleury
This is what I wanted to hear. I don't care about only one thread, I am just concerned about having only one running thread. I am adding an application level transaction data private to the cmp plugin, so I need to know if I need to synchronize access to the tx data. This is similar to

[JBoss-dev] Re: HURRAY!!!!!

2001-12-22 Thread Adrian Brock
Yep, Thats the problem. I'm not sure how to fix this? First I made it always read the content. The log now makes more sense, the stop isn't done until after the JSP init. But looking at the code, it always reads the content anyway and closes the stream. So all I'm doing is delaying the stop by

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: HURRAY!!!!!

2001-12-22 Thread Peter Fagerlund
Go back - -- WayBack ... there is truth ... ( or how U prefere to spee () ... meaning ... understanding the same !) ... tho ... on 1-12-22 19.29, Adrian Brock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yep, Thats the problem. I'm not sure how to fix this? First I made it always read the

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2001-12-22 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 216 Successful tests: 202 Errors:11 Failures: 3 [time of test: 23 December 2001 3:54 GMT] [java.version:

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2001-12-22 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 216 Successful tests: 202 Errors:11 Failures: 3 [time of test: 23 December 2001 5:53 GMT] [java.version: