That is true, arrays are not constructed by loadClass() calls.
Class.forName() does
it, but has this ugly and uneblievably stupid in-VM cache.
Maybe a solution would be to have a surrogate method that does array
construction but does not rely
on Class.forName, like this
not at all tested,
Peter,
The static java.net.URL.setURLStreamHandlerFactory() should be called only
once throughout the whole lifecycle of the VM to register the factory for
ALL urls. As I suppose from the code, this is already done ... So your URL
constructor in UDDI4J already uses it!
However, the
Bugs item #551452, was opened at 2002-05-02 15:21
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=551452group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Chris Harris (charris)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #551762, was opened at 2002-05-03 09:03
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=551762group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matt Goodall (mgoodall)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #501826, was opened at 2002-01-10 15:44
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=501826group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Closed
Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Corby (corby)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #502025, was opened at 2002-01-10 21:37
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=502025group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ronan-Yann Lorin (ryl)
Assigned
Bugs item #508185, was opened at 2002-01-24 23:56
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=508185group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Todd Huss (thuss)
Assigned to:
Patches item #551851, was opened at 2002-05-03 13:49
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=551851group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nguyen (wildnam)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Change Notes item #551858, was opened at 2002-05-03 07:08
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=551858group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4.5
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm)
Assigned to: Scott M Stark
James Birchfield released a replacement for the html adaptor and
the screen shots look good so let's give a workout. See
http://jmxview.sourceforge.net/
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Thanks for the help regarding the IIOP hang, after changing the port to 8683
JBoss starts up okay. Will Branch_3_0_0 be updated with this fix?
I have a couple of other problems which I thought perhaps someone could help
me with, both using the latest source code from CVS (branch Branch_3_0_0).
Bugs item #544437, was opened at 2002-04-15 19:00
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=544437group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: frederik sauer (fredsa)
Assigned to:
Dear all
We as a group have been developing a system based around JMS and a set of independent
EAR applications. These apps have been developed independently to a degree and were
also run on different instances of JBoss.
Now that we are trying to deploy on less servers in an environment
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Theo Harper wrote:
Thanks for the help regarding the IIOP hang, after changing the port to 8683
JBoss starts up okay. Will Branch_3_0_0 be updated with this fix?
The default IIOP port is already 8683 in HEAD, Branch_3_0_0, and 3.0.0RC2.
Francisco
Bugs item #551877, was opened at 2002-05-03 09:47
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=551877group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michael Hussey (mhussey)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #551877, was opened at 2002-05-03 09:47
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=551877group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michael Hussey (mhussey)
Assigned to:
Try providing some useful information like the exact JBoss version,
exceptions and deployment package structure. The bug you referenced
has been closed for 2 weeks as fixed and this fix is in the RC2 release.
Reopen as a new bug with the details if RC2 does not fix your issue.
Bugs item #551877, was opened at 2002-05-03 07:47
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=551877group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Closed
Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michael Hussey (mhussey)
Err, neither his .war file nor his CVS repository have source code. Am I missing
something?
Corby
* * *
View thread online: http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66thread=14755
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for
Apparently,
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/jmxview/jmxconnector.war
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Corby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:03 PM
Patches item #552010, was opened at 2002-05-03 15:17
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=552010group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Victor Langelo (vlangelo)
Assigned
Thank you, Thank you, Thank you :-)
* * *
View thread online: http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66thread=14752
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the
Yes, my point is that the .war file has no sources in it.
I deployed the .war file under 3.0 RC2, and can't really get it to do anything.
Bringing up http://localhost:8080/jmxconnector just gives me a directory listing.
I'd troubleshoot but there is no source code.
Corby
* * *
View thread
Then talk to James, not us.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Corby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] HTTP JMX view
In looking at a CMP cache bug report, it is another instance of an
xdoclet generated key screwing up the hashCode implementation.
Here is the generated key:
/*
* Generated file - Do not edit!
*/
package com.lombardrisk.scratch;
import java.lang.*;
import java.util.Collection;
import
Dude, it's no sweat off me. You were the one who asked for help evaluating the tool,
so I thought you might be able to use the feedback that the tool wasn't usable.
Corby
* * *
View thread online: http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66thread=14755
Hi,
Someone posted a message on the old
spydermq list that looks like it belongs
on this list. I am putting the original
message and my response below. If
someone finds something wrong with the
facts in my response please correct me.
Thanks,
Joel
***
***Mary wrote:
Just use:
http://localhost:8080/jmxconnector/jmx
--Marcus
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von
Corby
Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Mai 2002 22:33
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] HTTP JMX view replacement
Yes, my point is
Bugs item #551452, was opened at 2002-05-02 08:21
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=551452group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Pending
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Chris Harris (charris)
Assigned to:
Hi Geeks
Right now I ecounter another problem with XDoclet as we use it.
It does not generate the CMP classes correctly.
Note: the version we are using right now is not an offical version
but one between 1.1.2 and the current CVS Head which makes
it very difficult to use because there is not
That feature might have been broken in the 3.0 RC1, but I know for a FACT
that it is working in the CVS head now. We now have some automated junit
tests the create/destroy destinations via jmx on ever testcase.
Regards,
Hiram
From: Joel Boehland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: JBoss Dev [EMAIL
Number of tests run: 747
Successful tests: 734
Errors:1
Failures: 12
[time of test: 4 May 2002 0:59 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
Number of tests run: 747
Successful tests: 731
Errors:3
Failures: 13
[time of test: 4 May 2002 2:8 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
Number of tests run: 754
Successful tests: 743
Errors:8
Failures: 3
[time of test: 4 May 2002 3:10 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Blackdown Java-Linux Team]
Bugs item #552157, was opened at 2002-05-03 21:54
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=552157group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Victor Langelo (vlangelo)
Assigned to:
Number of tests run: 754
Successful tests: 751
Errors:0
Failures: 3
[time of test: 4 May 2002 4:45 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Blackdown Java-Linux Team]
Hi guys,
I just finished commiting some major refactoring of the JBossMQ server. It
just involved formaizing the interceptor pattern that peter started with the
security manager addition. I also refactored some of the JMX MBeans to
thier own package. So this is your notice:
THE JMX
Number of tests run: 745
Successful tests: 734
Errors:9
Failures: 2
[time of test: 4 May 2002 6:49 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_03]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.]
38 matches
Mail list logo
