Number of tests run: 749
Successful tests: 595
Errors:143
Failures: 11
[time of test: 10 May 2002 7:29 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_02]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems
Hi,
--- danch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This report says 142 errors, but the HTML report it links to says
11.
What gives? The dates don't match, but is that because this email
is
GMT and the HTML is server time?
Nope - the test was sending the email before setting up the directory
with
Can anyone on linux run the testsuite for cvs-rc3? I have tried several times
and it crashes the vm each time under 1.4 (have not yet tried 1.3.1). Seems to
happen alot in the jbossmq or jca tests, but I have no idea if that test is
tickling the vm or what.
My vm seems to be idling around 80
Bugs item #554437, was opened at 2002-05-10 09:51
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=554437group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul Nicklin (paulnicklin)
Assigned to:
We too have just finished this task. We used xdoclet to handle much of the
configuration issues through the generation of the deployment desciptors,
etc. Might be worth looking into.
Laine
- Original Message -
From: James Higginbotham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mahesh Agarwal [EMAIL
Bugs item #554502, was opened at 2002-05-10 14:11
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=554502group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Todd Neumarker (tneumarker)
Assigned to:
Hello Fred,
I am happy to here that someone will be providing JBoss integration to Flash MX. I
too saw the Macromedia demo at the recent JavaOne and was blown away by the
possibilities. I have been researching every workable (and FREE) alternative to
integrating J2EE server-side apps to a
Hi Geeks
No, it seems under Branch 3.0 it works fine under W2K.
Andy
- Original Message -
From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andreas Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Sacha Labourey [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 09,
Bugs item #554502, was opened at 2002-05-10 09:11
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=554502group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Todd Neumarker (tneumarker)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #554502, was opened at 2002-05-10 09:11
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=554502group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Todd Neumarker (tneumarker)
Assigned
Bugs item #554535, was opened at 2002-05-10 15:14
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=554535group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Niall O'Sullivan (nosullivan)
Assigned
Sure, I'd like to get feedback. The sooner limitations are seen in a
design the better. But it really is going to be relatively simple client
side support. I don't want to make the download time too large. I did get
side tracked in the last week, but will be writing those Actionscript SOAP
Bugs item #554437, was opened at 2002-05-10 03:51
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=554437group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul Nicklin (paulnicklin)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #554577, was opened at 2002-05-10 10:29
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=554577group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Wendell Nichols (wcn00)
Assigned
Bugs item #547831, was opened at 2002-04-23 19:17
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=547831group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Randy Dey-Toth (rdeytoth)
Bugs item #547831, was opened at 2002-04-23 16:17
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=547831group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Randy Dey-Toth (rdeytoth)
3.0 branch builds for me:
[starksm@banshee build]$ build.sh
Searching for build.xml ...
Buildfile: /home/starksm/cvsroot/JBoss3.0/jboss-all/build/build.xml
...
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 3 minutes 54 seconds
[starksm@banshee build]$
RedHat 7.3, Linux 2.4.18-3
java version 1.4.0
Java(TM) 2
Bugs item #554653, was opened at 2002-05-10 14:54
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=554653group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Wolfangel (swolfangel)
JDK 1.4.0 is also crashing for me about here:
[junit] Tests run: 25, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 234.215 sec
[junit] TEST org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.SecurityUnitTestCase FAILED
#
# HotSpot Virtual Machine Error : 11
# Error ID : 4F530E43505002D3
# Please report this error at
#
It looks like this could be an issue of compiling with JDK1.3.1_03 and then
running with JDK1.4.0. If I do a clean build using JDK 1.4.0 I am able to
run the testsuite using JDK1.4.0
tests-unit:
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 5 minutes 30 seconds
Scott Stark
Chief
FYI - I was having a similar problem when I compiled with jdk 1.3, but ran
on jdk 1.4 (Windows 2000).
-Larry
JDK 1.4.0 is also crashing for me about here:
[junit] Tests run: 25, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 234.215
sec
[junit] TEST
Hey,
We're using JBossTX for a commercial project (see my colleagues mail at
http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/10767/0/8602875/
for reference) and believe we might have found a bug related to
rollbacks with several enlisted resources. I didn't see it in the bug
tracker so I
Bugs item #554653, was opened at 2002-05-10 12:54
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=554653group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Wolfangel
Hi
I submitted a patch to sourceforge a couple of weeks ago against the
2.4 head which I hoped was going to make it into 2.4.5 final. It didn't
and that's ok, I have it locally on my copy of jboss. Is just submitting
patches to sourceforge the right thing to do, or is there a process for
people
The feature was included in 2.4.5, the patch status has simply not been
updated.
Sourceforge is the only way to submit patches.
public interface EmbeddedCatalinaServiceSXMBean extends
AbstractWebContainerMBean
{
...
/** Get the value to use for the catalina.base System
property. If not
That's great - thanks. I'll continue to put other patches on sourceforge.
At 03:10 PM 5/10/2002 -0700, Scott M Stark wrote:
The feature was included in 2.4.5, the patch status has simply not been
updated.
Sourceforge is the only way to submit patches.
public interface
Looks like a bug. I'll take a look.
We're going to try to put jbosstx in its own module soon.
One thing that would be really good would be some unit tests. I haven't
really thought about how to set them up yet. I guess all we really need
for a framework is a fake XAResource implementation and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Maybe unrelated, but the only problems I've had with jdk v1.4 were fixed
by giving the -Xcomp parameter on startup. I decided to try this in the
first place after finding what I thought to be a possible race condition
occurring between the garbage
OK, I fixed this. Can you please check it works as you expect?
Thanks
david jencks
On 2002.05.10 17:39:48 -0400 Johan Svensson wrote:
Hey,
We're using JBossTX for a commercial project (see my colleagues mail at
http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/10767/0/8602875/
Number of tests run: 755
Successful tests: 598
Errors:136
Failures: 21
[time of test: 11 May 2002 1:5 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
Agreed. On An experimental project, I've used Xdoclet to generate all of
my local CMPs, CMRs, and session beans for weblogic. I hope to try and
move this to Jboss with a few simple @jboss tags. Depoying a couple of
beans to Jboss manually helps understand how it all goes together, as
you try to
Is it possible to create flash without MM flash creator? Are there any
free alternatives? What does JGenerator do?
On fre, 2002-05-10 at 16:37, Darryl Thompson wrote:
Hello Fred,
I am happy to here that someone will be providing JBoss integration to Flash MX. I
too saw the Macromedia demo
Stephen Davidson wrote:
Greetings.
JDK 1.4.0
Linux 2.4.10
jboss-all
CVS Branch 3_0 Head.
Not building
-Steve
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get
In jboss-ql, beyond putting order clauses (could someone if I can modify it
dinamically?), Can I use it to make use of LIKE clauses with parameter? I
think this is not allowed by spec.
Emerson Cargnin - MSA
- Original Message -
From: James Higginbotham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Laine Donlan
Does anyone have some working configuration to make a Oracle Datasource
usable in CMP??
could send to me, i've tried from the oracle-services.xml, but i can just
get a connection if sending user a pass parameters. Please send me the files
changed. Mine just don't work...
Emerson
- Original
JBoss 2.4.5 final has been released and is available from SourceForge.
The changes notes may be viewed here:
http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=83816
Also available are bundled version of JBoss/Tomcat-4.0.3 and
JBoss/Jetty-4.0.0.
Scott Stark
Chief
Number of tests run: 750
Successful tests: 586
Errors:137
Failures: 27
[time of test: 11 May 2002 2:16 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
Bugs item #546393, was opened at 2002-04-19 23:33
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=546393group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: oleg shteynbuk (oshteynbuk)
Assigned to:
Number of tests run: 757
Successful tests: 604
Errors:142
Failures: 11
[time of test: 11 May 2002 3:21 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Blackdown Java-Linux
Bugs item #552536, was opened at 2002-05-05 09:23
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=552536group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Georg Schmid (giorgio42)
Assigned to: Jay
Number of tests run: 757
Successful tests: 612
Errors:134
Failures: 11
[time of test: 11 May 2002 5:0 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Blackdown Java-Linux
Bugs item #552532, was opened at 2002-05-05 09:14
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=552532group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Georg Schmid (giorgio42)
Assigned to: Jay
Could be... but now that I think about it I was compiling with 1.4 and running
with 1.4 and it was still crashing.
--jason
Quoting Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It looks like this could be an issue of compiling with JDK1.3.1_03 and then
running with JDK1.4.0. If I do a clean build using
What does -Xcomp do? I don't have doc on that (ala -X) under Linux w/1.4
--jason
Quoting David Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Maybe unrelated, but the only problems I've had with jdk v1.4 were fixed
by giving the -Xcomp parameter on startup. I
Number of tests run: 747
Successful tests: 593
Errors:143
Failures: 11
[time of test: 11 May 2002 6:54 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_03]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems
45 matches
Mail list logo
