Bugs item #565437, was opened at 2002-06-06 10:35
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=565437group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Pete Beck (wimflam)
Assigned
Bugs item #564232, was opened at 2002-06-03 23:54
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=564232group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Liam Magee (lmagee)
Assigned to:
Hi,
The org.jboss.Shutdown class does not seem to work.
This is failing because the jnet.jar has moved.
I presume that shutdown.sh also fails too - since that has not
changed etiher.
jnet.jar is now in several places (ie the configs) - all, default,
minimal and client.
Is it safe to
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.0
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.4.0
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
Bugs item #568439, was opened at 2002-06-13 02:24
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=568439group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeff Schnitzer (lhoriman)
Assigned to:
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.0
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.4.0
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.0
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
Chris,
It would be useful to have the name of the Branch/Label in the subject
(or the body...) if possible.
If I've missed it - please ignore,
Jules
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.4.0
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
I posted this as a followup to a thread on jboss-user - no-one commented
on it.
I think it is a neat idea, so I'm reposting it, under it's own subject
just in case no-one noticed it last time...
The context mentioned a BindingService which appears to be being written
to hand out ports to
1. Look at the quickstart guide from the sourceforge download page for the
broadest overview of how to use jboss 3. However, it looks like you
figured out the main points of what you need to do.
2. Turn on trace level logging for at least org.jboss.deployment and
org.jboss.system. This should
Bugs item #568501, was opened at 2002-06-13 08:00
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=568501group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Darryl Thompson (eusdart)
Assigned to:
I'm in the middle of upgrading from JBoss 2.4.3 to JBoss 3.0.0. I like much
of what I see, but I'm having trouble clearing one key hurdle.
My database is driven by McKoiDB 0.92; I created a simple MBean to start
McKoi as a thread inside JBoss, and created a datasource for it:
[2.4.3
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.0
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
Shutdown just does an http post and does not use JNDI so why
should it need jnet.jar? I am able to run shudown with a 1.3 vm
without the jnet.jar in my classpath so post the error you are seeing
bin 609shutdown.sh
Shutting down server localhost:8082
Shutdown complete
I wrote an ant task to call things on mbeans, and I'm wondering where to
put it. I'm tempted to put it in with Jason's console stuff since these
seem like they are both external ways of scripting administration. Any
other ideas?
Thanks
david jencks
I think this is a very cool idea and would solve this entire class of
problems. I think the problem is this will not be easy to implement. I
suggested the ServiceBindingManager service, because it was the simplest
thing I could think of to fix the port problem.
May be this will be easy to
I wrote it.
May be this will be easy to add to the JMX html adapter Scott just
added. BTW, Scott where did you get the code.
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -
Bugs item #568605, was opened at 2002-06-14 01:43
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=568605group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Brian Law (ecowalker)
Assigned
Hi,
--- Jules Gosnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris,
It would be useful to have the name of the Branch/Label in the
subject
(or the body...) if possible.
If I've missed it - please ignore,
I've added it now ;-)
This HEAD...
Chris
=
Alright, the main version has been completely rewritten to use the RMI
connector. The invariant location for client libs is the jboss-home/client
directory. I have updated the scripts to refer to this.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Bugs item #568619, was opened at 2002-06-13 13:19
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=568619group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dain Sundstrom (dsundstrom)
Assigned
Number of tests run: 609
Successful tests: 607
Errors:1
Failures: 1
[time of test: 13 June 2002 13:5 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
Bugs item #568668, was opened at 2002-06-13 20:13
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=568668group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Misha Rybalov (mrybalov)
Assigned
Bugs item #568501, was opened at 2002-06-13 08:00
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=568501group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Darryl Thompson (eusdart)
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I think this is a very cool idea and would solve this entire class of
problems. I think the problem is this will not be easy to implement. I
suggested the ServiceBindingManager service, because it was the simplest
thing I could think of to fix the port problem.
Bugs item #563799, was opened at 2002-06-03 04:15
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=563799group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jakob Dalsgaard (dalsgaard)
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.0
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
Number of tests run: 772
Successful tests: 763
Errors:6
Failures: 3
[time of test: 14 June 2002 2:28 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_03]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems
This is so retarded. Shutdown does work, it is the automation which is
whacked out.
After you shutdown, wait and if it is still running after n seconds then
kill it, no need to keep wasting bits to email this rather useless
notification.
If perhaps it was a problem with the container not
Bugs item #565701, was opened at 2002-06-07 01:15
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=565701group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nigel Magnay (magnayn)
Bugs item #568668, was opened at 2002-06-13 13:13
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=568668group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Misha Rybalov (mrybalov)
Bugs item #567302, was opened at 2002-06-11 03:29
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=567302group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mauro Migliardi (mmiglia)
Is making is really difficult to detect when a class is
really missing. The service which depends on it just doesnt ever show
up leaving the user to wonder why, it is in the config file, it read the
config file but wtf, where is my service.
Why are we doing this again?
--jason
Bugs item #544437, was opened at 2002-04-15 19:00
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=544437group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Frederik Sauer (fredsa)
Assigned
It lets packages deploy successfully in more orders than without it, and
lets you undeploy and redeploy a class without having to undeploy and
redeploy the mbean instances of that class.
That being said, the silent feature we have now is not very helpful.
I've been wondering what a solution
Bugs item #567441, was opened at 2002-06-11 10:27
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=567441group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andras Soltesz (soltesz_andras)
Logging this is really of little use. There has to be a timeout that fails
deployments so that error level logging can be captured and used
as a trigger to page an admin if desired. Having the the state of
a deployment including its dependencies available through jmx would
be more useful for
Bugs item #568605, was opened at 2002-06-13 10:43
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=568605group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Brian Law (ecowalker)
Bugs item #562660, was opened at 2002-05-30 16:14
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=562660group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Pending
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 9
Submitted By: Peter Luttrell
Bugs item #565279, was opened at 2002-06-06 05:11
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=565279group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Rejected
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Marius Kotsbak (mkotsbak)
43 matches
Mail list logo
