Bugs item #619171, was opened at 2002-10-06 02:11
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=619171group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Timur Zambalayev (timurz)
Assigned
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.1_03
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.4.0_01
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
Hello Liam!
Liam Magee wrote:
I've uploaded the patch via the link below. Let me know if there are any
problems with this. At the moment there is no integration between the
Tomcat Mbeans and JBossJMX.
I tried to attach the Catalina MBeans to the JBoss-MBeanServer. I got
some parts to work. Now
Bugs item #562972, was opened at 2002-05-31 18:30
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=562972group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 1
Submitted By: Marius Kotsbak (mkotsbak)
Assigned
See below ...
On Sun, 2002-10-06 at 03:14, Jason Dillon wrote:
Hrm... so what is it there for I wonder? If you remove it does deployment
still function?
When I realised what isDeployable() was for I changed it to
unconditionally return false to see what the effect would be. On
startup,
A new 1.6.1 hsqldb.jar is in cvs HEAD with the thread bug fix -
Thanks to Michael Bartmann.
/peter_f
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
ÎÒÕæ³ÏµØÏòÄúÍƼöÒ»¸ö¼ÈÄܹºÎïÓÖÄÜ°ïÄú׬ǮµÄÍøÕ¾!
ÊÇÕæÊǼÙ,Äú¿´Á˾ÍÖªµÀÁË£º
http://www.dirshop.com/mall/index.php?user=luckboy
µ«Ô¸ÎÒÄܸøÄú´øÀ´ºÃÔË!
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
Feature Requests item #619321, was opened at 2002-10-06 10:35
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376688aid=619321group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Pucky Loucks (pucky)
Assigned to:
The org.jboss.test.perf.test.PerfStressTestCase is failing in 3.0 with the following
error.
Please look into why this just started happening.
11:58:25,336 INFO [MainDeployer] Starting deployment of package: file:/C:/usr/J
Boss3.0/jboss-all/testsuite/output/lib/perf.jar
11:58:25,366 WARN
Number of tests run: 942
Successful tests: 939
Errors:2
Failures: 1
[time of test: 6 October 2002 12:41 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
Patches item #619457, was opened at 2002-10-07 01:27
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=619457group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Corby (corby)
Assigned to:
Hi Thomas,
I haven't looked deeply into Tomcat MBean support, this is the next
natural step for integration b/w JBoss and Tomcat.
Regards,
Liam.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Thomas Peuss
Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 6:54 PM
To:
Hi... me again ;)
I finally got around to fixing, or rather getting around an unfortunate
side-effect of the CVS 'update' command. The previous behavior would cause
local clients to download the entire thirdparty/* module (which is time and
space consuming).
CVS is not desgined to handle
Ì©·áÏòÄãÎʺÃ!
ÎÒ¹«Ë¾³¤ÆÚ´Óʹú¼ÊóÒ×,ΪÍÚ¾òÊг¡Ç±Á¦¡¢À©´ó¾Óª¹æÄ£,ÒâÔÚ¹óµØ
Ñ°ÕÒÁôÒ×´°¿Ú,Ìؽ«´Ë¼Ûͬ±í³Ê¹óµ¥Î»²Î¿¼.ÎÒ˾ÌṩһÁ÷Æ·ÖÊ,Ò»Á÷·þÎñ,
ËÍ»õÉÏÃÅ, ÅúÁí¾ù¿É.
Ì©·áóÒ×¼¯ÍŹ«Ë¾
̨±±ÊÐÄþ²¨Â·38#óÒ×ÖÐÐÄA´±16-20
Öйú´ú±í´¦£ºÍõ±£¹ú
ÁªÏµµç»°£º01395-9727338
Ò».µçÄÔÅä¼þ(RMB.Ôª):
A:Ó²ÅÌ
Maxtor
15 matches
Mail list logo
