The latest linux magazine has a sidebar on the top 500 most powerful computing
platforms
in the world and there are two linux Beowulf clusters in the top 10:
- A 2304 node cluster of pentium 4 2.4GHz Xenon at LLNL can do 5.6 teraflops
- A 1536 node cluster of dual pentium 4 2.2GHz Xenons at NOAA
Bugs item #668291, was opened at 2003-01-15 13:54
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=668291group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Brian Bannister (beoch)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #668291, was opened at 2003-01-15 13:54
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=668291group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Brian Bannister (beoch)
Assigned
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, danch wrote:
It's not especially computation intensive, but it is resource intensive:
it consumes a process table entry. Each user is allowed only a certain
number of process table entries, and the overall system has an upper limit.
This latter point is no longer true, in
There was still a problem here in that the jboss.server.home.dir needs to be set before
any log4j calls are made or else the boot.log that is generated in between startup and
the time the Log4jService is started is dumped to /log/boot.log. I broke out the
initialization of the base system
Dustin,
Please don't take offense here, but you seem to be heading in
a couple
of directions where, based on my experience, I think you'll hit some
problems. Apologies in advance if I've misunderstood.
I never take offense to constructive criticisms/comments, I learn from them,
so no
the only reason is that no one has previously written a
distributed tx
manager. I wrote the basic stuff we need in jboss 4, it should even
work with the trunk invoker.
david jencks
Can this be back ported to the 3.x series? I'm mostly interested in the
3.2, but i presume it would
Bugs item #669545, was opened at 2003-01-16 22:41
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=669545group_id=22866
Category: Build System
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 8
Submitted By: Matthew Munz (mattmunz)
Assigned to: Jason
That I don't know. I would assume that anyone with SF developer status on
any project could user their login to access the repository, but I don't know
how SF cvs is setup. I think they are simply seperating access between
developer logins and the anonymous login.
Scott
There is this tool no permission role, I can't set it. Can you ?
I have created the nobody123 unix login at sourceforge :)
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of marc fleury
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 11:03 PM
To: [EMAIL
Adam Heath wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, danch wrote:
It's not especially computation intensive, but it is resource intensive:
it consumes a process table entry. Each user is allowed only a certain
number of process table entries, and the overall system has an upper limit.
This latter point
I browsed back through the latest spec and I am still not
sure what some of these objects represent, but that is not
important for my initial focus. What I want is to remove the
dependency on JSR-77 components from the core layer. Right
now even the minimal configuration has to include
Title: Message
oops :)
marcf
-Original
Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Scott M StarkSent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:26
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
Re: [JBoss-dev] JSR-77 refactoring has begun
Also, any discussion off
Bugs item #668291, was opened at 2003-01-15 13:54
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=668291group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Brian Bannister (beoch)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #669545, was opened at 2003-01-16 22:41
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=669545group_id=22866
Category: Build System
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 8
Submitted By: Matthew Munz (mattmunz)
Assigned to: Jason
Bugs item #668291, was opened at 2003-01-15 13:54
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=668291group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Brian Bannister (beoch)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #668291, was opened at 2003-01-15 03:54
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=668291group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Brian Bannister (beoch)
Assigned to:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1053
Successful tests: 1048
Errors:4
Failures: 1
[time of test: 2003-01-17.06-49 GMT]
[java.version:
Bugs item #668291, was opened at 2003-01-15 03:54
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=668291group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Brian Bannister (beoch)
Assigned to:
Sourceforge has killed anon CVS until further notice.
From: Chris Kimpton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 03:44:40 -0800 (PST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Main is not building
Hi,
I can't even get the code - I get connection
Look on the support section of the Web site.
They were having stability problems with CVS and killed anon until they can
stabilize it...
Hunter
From: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:50:07 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
JAVA_HOME should be set to:
/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.4.1/Home
or
/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.3.1/Home
Depending on which JVM you are using...
What is your set to?
From: Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The jboss-3.2.0RC1-src.tgz originally released had many files missing. It
has been rereleased and is available here:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/jboss/jboss-3.2.0RC1-src.tgz?download
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
All,
Today has started off great, we just got a call from Frank
at Linux World letting us know that we are finalists in two categories at Linux
World. They are:
Best Open Source Project other finalists include
Eclipse, Open Office, Vovida, and ephibian (spelling could be wrong)
Thought you might want to read the official release. We are swimming
with the Sharks:) I think we can and should win the open source project
as we have a more mature code base and more downloads than any of the
other projects. It should be interesting to see what happens. We are
competing
All we need is to create a user with a given name and passwd and add him
to our cvs tree, we give him rights to checkout under a name, can I stop
him from checking in?
We publicize the anonymous login equivalent and give them the cvs line
to run.
marcf
xx
Marc Fleury, Ph.D.
OK bootcamp in Atlanta is Feb 1-2 and almost ALL core developers are
coming to Atlanta. It is a meeting of JBoss minds and don't want to
miss it as we rarely get together this way. It is kind of unique. I
know I am seriously looking forward to it.
BootCamp is a weekend session, Saturday
101 - 127 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
