Disagree.
Consider following:
1. Cluster running banking application with SFSB's
Ok.
2. Cluster is split into two groups
ok
3. Each group continues concurently previous computation
You mean: you may have work in progress for a given set of SFSB on each node
(each node being on a
Hi,
after setting the log level to debug, i get an InstanceAlreadyExistsException
when i deploy an ear-file in server.log. The application works as expected. The
exception is thrown, when the ear-file jsr-77 mbean shall be registerd at the
end of the deployment. It seems that it was registerd
Bugs item #705542, was opened at 2003-03-18 22:53
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=705542group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Johan Granlund (johgr814)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #705542, was opened at 2003-03-18 12:53
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=705542group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Johan Granlund (johgr814)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #705542, was opened at 2003-03-18 12:53
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=705542group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Johan Granlund (johgr814)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #711276, was opened at 2003-03-28 16:35
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=711276group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Srivatsan (srivatsanp)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Hi Sacha,
6. Partition merge occurs
Ok.
7. SFBS state on nodes of second group is rewriten by state of first
unfished group
No. Here, you make the assumption that you can have CONCURRENT access to the
SAME SFSB which is not allowed per spec.
Maybe that's one of the points. As I understand
i could just get to the site after 6 hrs of trying and its damn slow
looks to cluttered to me..the links ought to be more organized...
its somehow not as attention grabbing as the prev one
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
The
application is not slow, the bandwidth is small.
the box is all the time in iddle and the average time for
computing a page is 17 ms.
julien.
RG i could just get to the site after 6 hrs of trying and its damn slow
RG looks to cluttered to me..the links ought to be more organized...
RG its
Ok, what can be done to solve that problem? In the end it is slow no
matter who's the problem...
/L
fredagen den 28 mars 2003 kl 12.34 skrev julien viet:
application is not slow, the bandwidth is small.
the box is all the time in iddle and the average time for
computing a page is 17 ms.
Hi,
It looks like ServerConfigImpl and ServerConfig got out of sync...
S:\jboss\Branch_3_2\system\src\main\org\jboss\system\server\ServerConfigImpl.jav
a:43: org.jboss.system.server.ServerConfigImpl should be declared abstract; it d
oes not define isRequireJBossURLStreamHandlerFactory() in
Bugs item #594137, was opened at 2002-08-12 19:13
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=594137group_id=22866
Category: JBossSOAP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Marius Kotsbak (mkotsbak)
Bugs item #697465, was opened at 2003-03-04 20:45
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=697465group_id=22866
Category: JBossSOAP
Group: v3.2
Status: Pending
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Joe Hung (joehung)
Assigned to: Dr.
Bugs item #708691, was opened at 2003-03-24 09:21
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=708691group_id=22866
Category: JBossSOAP
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dr. Christoph Georg Jung (cgjung)
Assigned
Bugs item #617517, was opened at 2002-10-02 14:01
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=617517group_id=22866
Category: JBossSOAP
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dr. Christoph Georg Jung (cgjung)
Assigned
Bugs item #617517, was opened at 2002-10-02 14:01
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=617517group_id=22866
Category: JBossSOAP
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dr. Christoph Georg Jung (cgjung)
Assigned
Bugs item #607684, was opened at 2002-09-11 09:07
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=607684group_id=22866
Category: JBossSOAP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Remind
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Dr. Christoph Georg Jung (cgjung)
Bugs item #710757, was opened at 2003-03-27 16:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710757group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Deleted
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tarek Hammoud (thammoud)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #711329, was opened at 2003-03-28 14:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=711329group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Roland Bergler (bergler)
Assigned
Bugs item #710758, was opened at 2003-03-27 16:52
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710758group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Deleted
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tarek Hammoud (thammoud)
Assigned to:
application is not slow, the bandwidth is small.
the box is all the time in iddle and the average time for
computing a page is 17 ms.
This is IMHO the badest kind-of-answer i must read from time to time in
other places.
If you have a problem, then you have a problem. It is not my problem:
I
Bugs item #711341, was opened at 2003-03-28 19:18
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=711341group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Srivatsan (srivatsanp)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Trying to return an unknown connection2!
Bugs item #711346, was opened at 2003-03-28 19:25
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=711346group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Shyam Sundar
Bugs item #617517, was opened at 2002-10-02 14:01
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=617517group_id=22866
Category: JBossSOAP
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Closed
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dr. Christoph Georg Jung (cgjung)
Bugs item #705542, was opened at 2003-03-18 13:53
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=705542group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Johan Granlund (johgr814)
Assigned to:
Title: Nachricht
Hi,
before 3.2 final
will be built, thefollowing bugs have been addressed in Branch_3_2 and
HEAD:
Bug#638994 -
JBossAuthenticationHandler can now handle null-passwords if the associated
SecurityDomain does.
Bug#594137 - A
special HttpActionHandler has been installed in
I will be contacting the hosters it seems the network is a bit screwed
up
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lennart Petersson
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 6:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] Regarding
Bela Ban wrote:
Igor Fedorenko wrote:
Hi,
It looks like ServerConfigImpl and ServerConfig got out of sync...
S:\jboss\Branch_3_2\system\src\main\org\jboss\system\server\ServerConfigImpl.jav
a:43: org.jboss.system.server.ServerConfigImpl should be declared
abstract; it d
oes not define
Bela Ban wrote:
Igor Fedorenko wrote:
Hi,
It looks like ServerConfigImpl and ServerConfig got out of sync...
S:\jboss\Branch_3_2\system\src\main\org\jboss\system\server\ServerConfigImpl.jav
a:43: org.jboss.system.server.ServerConfigImpl should be declared
abstract; it d
oes not define
Dave Smith:
May God Bless America and Java.
That is a very humanistic thing that you wish here, but you make a small
typo.
As a friend of Java you know that Java is in Indonesia and Indonesia is the
country with the most Muslims all over the word.
So you should better write God Bless America and
Bugs item #710396, was opened at 2003-03-26 15:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710396group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.2
Status: Pending
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stefan Reich (sreich)
Assigned
Bugs item #576913, was opened at 2002-07-03 08:07
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=576913group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Georg Schmid (giorgio42)
Assigned
Bugs item #710396, was opened at 2003-03-26 15:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710396group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stefan Reich (sreich)
Assigned to:
Hi folks,
just wasted half a day on an IPv6 related problem. I ran an instance of
JBoss on 2 nodes (A and B), config as follows:
A: Suse 8 Linux 2.4, JDK 1.4.1_02, JBoss head, IPv4/IPv6
B: Windows XP, JDK 1.4.1_02, JBoss head, IPv4
The bind_addr property in UDP was set correctly, but A and B
Bugs item #710396, was opened at 2003-03-26 15:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710396group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stefan Reich (sreich)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #710396, was opened at 2003-03-26 15:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710396group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stefan Reich (sreich)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #710396, was opened at 2003-03-26 15:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710396group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stefan Reich (sreich)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #710396, was opened at 2003-03-26 15:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710396group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stefan Reich (sreich)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #698682, was opened at 2003-03-06 04:47
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=698682group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mauricio Hiroshi Nagaoka (mhnagaoka)
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1159
Successful tests: 1154
Errors:5
Failures: 0
[time of test: 2003-03-29.02-19 GMT]
[java.version:
-Original Message-
From: Hunter Hillegas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 1:16 PM
To: JBoss Dev
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] NUKES on JBoss
I'm sure they did do some testing...
I'm sure they did, and it's a great improvement over the PHP version.
But, I'd
AOP TxLock committed. Its a transactional pessimistic lock mostly stolen
from the Entity bean stuff we do. An example is in the aop testsuite.
Bill
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
The xdoclet generate xmbean still has a bogus descriptor that is causing the
deployment to fail:
Caused by: ReflectionException: null
Cause: javax.management.IntrospectionException: no getter method found for attribute:
Password
at
On OSX with Safari site load relatively fast *** if I use IE it just
do not happen !!! (20sek+)
It seems to be a separate image/ad's server (buggy ?) that is awed
and IE is stuck waiting for it ? while Safari threads requests
differently ...
Regarding the layout - use a pro ...
Thanks
Julien,
Thank you for clearing this. I just have strange bad feelings sometimes
...
;-)
bax
Am Freitag, 28.03.03, um 15:55 Uhr (Europe/Budapest) schrieb julien
viet:
I dont' say that, the problem is clearly the provider for me. I
thought everyone would have noticed that. We are working on it.
Igor Fedorenko wrote:
Hi,
It looks like ServerConfigImpl and ServerConfig got out of sync...
S:\jboss\Branch_3_2\system\src\main\org\jboss\system\server\ServerConfigImpl.jav
a:43: org.jboss.system.server.ServerConfigImpl should be declared
abstract; it d
oes not define
Its fixed.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Igor Fedorenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sourceforge. Net (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 3:44 AM
Subject:
47 matches
Mail list logo
