[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Patches item #415321, was updated on 2001-04-10 22:00
> You can respond by visiting:
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=415321&group_id=22866
>
> Submitted By: David Jencks (d_jencks)
> Summary: RAR Instance Deployer for jbosscx
>
> Initial
The Jetty mbean is logging the exception itself as a warning and then it
is throwing the proper ReflectionException. The issue is that ServiceControl
is invoking JBoss Service methods on any mbean that registers with the
MBeanServer. There needs to be a way to tell ServiceControl that categories
o
Hi,
Well, it looks to me like he has thrown the NoSuchMethodException himself
in his ModelMBeanImpl. This exception dexcends from Exception, thus is not
a reflection exception, and isn't caught by any of the exception
handlers/ignorers.
I don't yet understand what ModelMBeans are for... but if
Patches item #415321, was updated on 2001-04-10 22:00
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=415321&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Jencks (d_jencks)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Su
They can't create a wrapper because mbeans are being created as a byproduct
of interaction with the Jetty JMX interface. This is a generic issue with integrating
third party services that happen to be mbeans which may be using the JMX bus
for whatever purpose. Its trivial to add a filter by domain
|The stack trace is coming from the Jetty ModelMBeanImpl class, not JBoss's
|ServiceControl. Although annoying, this is just a cosmetic
|exception. To clean
|this up we could add a notification filter attribute to the
|ServiceControl mbean
Again, implement the empty wrapper, that you don't want t
Ok, the issue is that Jetty is not using a simple MBean, its using a ModelMBean
which is a more dynamic entity that does not expose its methods statically.
Therefore the MBeanServer has to pass the method invocation onto the bean
to see if its implemented, and in this case it is not.
The stack t
Is this with the latest JBoss2.2/Jetty bundle? If so I'll look at why there is
an exception.
>
> > There shouldn't even be a log msg about the missing method since if you invoke a
> > method that does not exist on an MBean you will get a ReflectionException and
> > these are simply ignored. All
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I dont think the problem is in his notification propagation. Call it
> the "problem" or not - ServiceControl withouth checking for any
> type (org.jboss.util.Service) adds all registered MBeans (through
> notification callback) to the list of MBean
User: starksm
Date: 01/04/10 19:04:21
Added: src/main/org/jboss/security/auth/spi
AbstractServerLoginModule.java
DatabaseServerLoginModule.java
IdentityLoginModule.java LdapLoginModule.java
Hey,
> There shouldn't even be a log msg about the missing method since if you invoke a
> method that does not exist on an MBean you will get a ReflectionException and
> these are simply ignored. All MBeans show up on the management page because
> this page is about MBeans and cares nothing abo
User: starksm
Date: 01/04/10 19:04:21
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/security/plugins/samples
DatabaseServerLoginModule.java
IdentityLoginModule.java JaasServerLoginModule.java
LdapLoginModule.java RolesLoginModule.ja
User: starksm
Date: 01/04/10 19:04:20
Removed: src/main/org/jboss/security/auth ObjectCallback.java
SecurityAssociationCallback.java
SecurityAssociationHandler.java
UsernamePasswordHandler.java
Log:
Clean up th
User: starksm
Date: 01/04/10 19:04:21
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/security/srp/jaas
SRPCacheLoginModule.java
Log:
Clean up the package structure.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +2 -2
jbosssx/src/main/org/jboss/security/srp/jaas/SRPCacheLogi
Hey,
> With respect to the "Service" api, it is a bare minimum to play with in
> integration. It is a wrapper pattern pure and simple. If you want to leave
> all the methods empty you are welcome.
>
I think Jules is aware of that. He doesn't want to make wrapper if
possible.
> In short I **
User: starksm
Date: 01/04/10 19:04:20
Added: src/main/org/jboss/security/auth/callback
ObjectCallback.java
SecurityAssociationCallback.java
SecurityAssociationHandler.java
UsernamePassword
User: starksm
Date: 01/04/10 19:04:21
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/security/plugins JaasSecurityManager.java
Log:
Clean up the package structure.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +2 -2
jbosssx/src/main/org/jboss/security/plugins/JaasSecurityManager.java
Index: J
User: starksm
Date: 01/04/10 18:54:46
Added: src/main/org/jboss/security/plugins
JaasSecurityManagerService.java
JaasSecurityManagerServiceMBean.java
Log:
Moved the JaasSecurityManager MBean to the JBossSX package
Revision Cha
> What exactly happens when you deploy a init-free mbean? Looking at the
> ServiceControl mbean, which seems to be what calls init, it appears to
> catch and log the fact that the method is missing. Does it not show up on
> the management web page?
>
There shouldn't even be a log msg about the m
|Personally I really like the xml-format .jcml configuration format and
|would not mind if everyone else used it too.
Yes I have been saying this since the beginning, since it makes the MLet
craziness bearable. When I asked for the feature I didn't fully read the
code that was produced. I am ful
|It appears to me that:
|
|JBoss does not expect MBeans both not to implement Service not to be
|statically loaded from a file.
|
|Am I wrong ?
Not entirely.
The fact that it is loaded from a file is not relevant (in fact we use the
file as the input to the Configuration Service which in its new
Hi,
I've been wondering just how the mbean stuff works so when I saw your
question I looked around a bit.
I am not yet an expert, if I am wrong please correct me.
I think any mbeans registered with the jmx server jboss is using should be
visible on the same web-management page as jboss stuff.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 05:21:50PM -0700, Scott M Stark wrote:
> Actually I like the public qualifier as otherwise if you copy and paste
> from an interface declaration to some implementation you have to add
> the public back in or else you violating the interface. Maybe your just
> too sophistica
I doubt that there is a technique for guaranteeing enterprise unique UIDs in
Java.
jim
- Original Message -
From: "Sean Neville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 2:00 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Object Unique Id Generator
> There are a series of
> My problem is this:
>
> If I set them up to register with the JBoss MBeanServer, the
> ServiceControlMBean receives notification of their registration and, in
> spite of the fact that they do not implement org.jboss.util.Service,
> calls init() on them unsuccessfully.
>
> It appears to me that
Hi--
This may be a naive and/or sloppy approach, but could you stub out a
no-op init() method in your MBean, just so that NoSuchMethod error
wouldn't be thrown? Its not pretty, but it could probably get you past
this problem. (Unless I'm missing something here.. very possible.. :-)
)
--Joel
"
Actually I like the public qualifier as otherwise if you copy and paste
from an interface declaration to some implementation you have to add
the public back in or else you violating the interface. Maybe your just
too sophisticated and copy/paste aren't in your repertoire so you don't
see this prob
Hey,
>If I set them up to register with the JBoss MBeanServer, the
>ServiceControlMBean receives notification of their registration and, in
>spite of the fact that they do not implement org.jboss.util.Service,
>calls init() on them unsuccessfully.
Exact point from our discussion before.
>It a
What is the problem that you cannot implement the necessary
interfaces?
Andy
> -Original Message-
> From: Julian Gosnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 4:36 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] Dynamically created 3rd-party MBeans -
> Crystali
Thanks everyone for your input.
I believe I am now able to crystalise my problem for you all.
I wish to integrate some 3rd-party MBeans into JBoss.
I create the first MBean, which creates others as and when needed,
dynamically (maybe days later), registering all of them with the same
MBeanServ
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 04:15:09PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -public abstract String getTitle() throws RemoteException;
> +public String getTitle() throws RemoteException;
We should get rid of the public qualifier from the interfaces as well (it's
implicit and discouraged by the langu
User: starksm
Date: 01/04/10 16:15:09
Modified:src/docs cmp.xml
Log:
Remove the stuff about the abstract qualifier requirement.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +11 -24manual/src/docs/cmp.xml
Index: cmp.xml
==
juju,
best is to put a page with "contributing", I have about 1024 ideas to
implement and would like to use the "task" stuff to get people to look at
specific bits where we can parallelize the problems. Also we might be
taking a crack at the EJB compatibility : so that will be a good place
to
Ok, I'll kill it.
- Original Message -
From: "danch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] How could this be or ever have been true
> Scott M Stark wrote:
>
> > Someone brought up this point on the doc mailing list.
Bill Burke wrote:
> Hey Dan,
>
> If you're not going to commit it, could you put the patch on the
> SourceForge patches page? I'm really interested in the patch as well,
> because I'm doing load testing next week.
I'll be committing something in the next couple of days. I thought that
Chris
is teh bug well documented and reproduceable?
marc
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of danch
|Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 1:43 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] snapshot of load bug?
|
|
|In the short term, I'll send y
Scott M Stark wrote:
> Someone brought up this point on the doc mailing list. In current CMP
> documentation there is the following statement:
>
>
> Note also that JBoss requires that these methods are declared as
> `abstract' when using CMP. It does not matter for session Beans,
> and some EJB
Are you talking about a new service that replaces org.jboss.util.ServiceControl or
a new service? The ServiceControl MBean that manages service lifecyle also
manages service dependencies and the invocation of init() and start() are distinct
phases. When start is called on a service you know that
User: starksm
Date: 01/04/10 15:43:57
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/security/plugins package.html
Removed: src/main/org/jboss/security/plugins
JaasSecurityManagerService.java
JaasSecurityManagerServiceMBean.java
Log:
Move the Jaas
User: starksm
Date: 01/04/10 15:45:17
Modified:src/build build.xml
Log:
Remove the org.jboss.security.plugins package from the javadoc list
as this no longer has any source in this module.
Revision ChangesPath
1.59 +2 -2 jboss/src/build/build.xml
Index:
User: starksm
Date: 01/04/10 15:43:57
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/security/plugins/samples package.html
Log:
Move the JaasSecurityManager to the JBossSX module and fix the package.html
files javadoc was complaining about
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +3 -1 jboss
User: starksm
Date: 01/04/10 15:43:57
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/security package.html
Log:
Move the JaasSecurityManager to the JBossSX module and fix the package.html
files javadoc was complaining about
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +4 -1 jboss/src/main/org/jb
Hey Dan,
If you're not going to commit it, could you put the patch on the
SourceForge patches page? I'm really interested in the patch as well,
because I'm doing load testing next week.
Thanks,
Bill
danch wrote:
> In the short term, I'll send you a patch. Probably there would be a
> JBoss 2
Someone brought up this point on the doc mailing list. In current CMP
documentation there is the following statement:
Note also that JBoss requires that these methods are declared as
`abstract' when using CMP. It does not matter for session Beans,
and some EJB server aren't fussy (e.g., Sun J2EE
The lack of execute permissions seems to be an artifact of the zip archive
as it does not seem be able to maintain this attribute. In reality this is a
trivial thing and having execute permission on the run.sh script does not
guarantee that it will run correctly as this requires that /bin/sh is a
User: gropi
Date: 01/04/10 13:43:49
Modified:business doco.html
Log:
added "work in progress" section.
added link to migration guide.
Revision ChangesPath
1.18 +6 -0 newsite/business/doco.html
Index: doco.html
===
Hello,
I created a simple custom finder method. I put the following entry in
jaws.xml. in the section with my entity bean.
findName
NAME = {0}
NAME DESC
And put the appropriate code in the home interface.
I'm getting the
Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Julian this is not CC-ed to jboss-dev since I can not post it there at the
> moment. So you can post it to jboss-dev if you want.
Already doing it...
>
>
> > > Is this the right direction?
> >
> > It is - and I have already done this. Every Jetty MBean that
I think that the JBoss inspired life-cycle is too restrictive, I'd
like to be able to define life-cycle schemas in the XMLet resource
file, or in another XML file. An XMLet version might look something
like:
User: stacycurl
Date: 01/04/10 13:50:09
Modified:src/main/org/jbossmx/cluster/watchdog/mbean/xmlet
XMLetNodeProcessor.java XMLet.java
Added: src/main/org/jbossmx/cluster/watchdog/mbean/xmlet
XMLetMetaDataNodeProcessor.java
Log:
Bugs item #415230, was updated on 2001-04-10 13:19
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=415230&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.2 (stable)
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonym
User: stacycurl
Date: 01/04/10 13:47:53
Modified:src/main/org/jbossmx/cluster/watchdog/util/xml
XMLScripter.java
Log:
Cleaned up XMLScripter.
XMLScripter will now propagate out XMLScriptException thrown by
NodeProcessors, rather than squashing them
User: gropi
Date: 01/04/10 13:42:46
Added: documentation migration.html
Log:
initial checkin of migration guide. contains only very basic steps.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 newsite/documentation/migration.html
Index: migration.html
=
User: stacycurl
Date: 01/04/10 13:44:25
Added: src/main/org/jbossmx/util ObjectNameMetaData.java
MetaDataServiceMBean.java MetaDataService.java
Log:
The MetaDataService MBean allows you to associate a 'ObjectNameMetaData'
object to each ObjectName.
T
User: stacycurl
Date: 01/04/10 13:42:46
jbossmx/src/main/org/jbossmx/util - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
ping me to answer this (wrapping up some stuff at the moment)
marc
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|Julian Gosnell
|Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 11:09 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] Nested JMX Service Groups...??!
|
|
Yep that's right. Mine is in there and is called "HIGH/LOW Singleton+Session
Bean Universal Object ID Generator". It has been designed following the
pattern discussion at the same place called "Entity Bean Primary Key
Generator".
Yes Sean, some solutions do not require database access or singleto
See the custom service via MBeans howto:
http://www.jboss.org/documentation/HTML/ch10s40.html
The ServiceControl MBean section talks about the init/start/stop/destroy
lifecycle methods used by JBoss services.
- Original Message -
From: "Julian Gosnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PR
Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Julian Gosnell wrote:
> > JBoss kicks off a JettyService (this IS configured in
> > jboss.conf and DOES comply with JBoss' lifecycle
> > interface).
> >
>
> Aha so you already have JettyService, cool, I wasnt aware of that if you
> can be
Bugs item #415223, was updated on 2001-04-10 12:20
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=415223&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.2 (stable)
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymou
There is a conceptual issue I like to raise here. From my
point of view the "Unique Key" is part of the DB and therefore
under the ownership of the DB. The idea I saw there would
work under some assumptions:
- DB belongs only to the application
- There is no interaction with the DB except through
Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
>
>
> > Each non-JBoss MBean that registers with JBoss has
> > init() called on it via JMX - Thus JBoss appears to
> > mandate that all MBeans registered with it's
> > MBeanServer support the JBoss Service lifecycle. Jetty
> > MBeans don't and are thus incompatible, des
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 10:09:41AM -0700, Jeffrey Wescott wrote:
>
> Toby Allsopp wrote:
>
> > Hi. First, this is question for the jboss-user list. This list is for
> > discussion of the development of JBoss itself.
>
> Uh-huh. To quote myself "... where IN THE CODE can I ...". I didn't
> th
There are a series of key generation patterns available on The Server Side,
at least one of which requires no databases and no singletons, and is
therefore quite portable:
http://www2.theserverside.com/patterns/index.jsp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
In the short term, I'll send you a patch. Probably there would be a
JBoss 2.2.1 release at some point, as well.
Bear in mind, however, that I really don't think we've found the bug
that you're seeing: the race I found really only (as far as I can tell)
effected cases where a Hueristic exception s
User: juhalindfors
Date: 01/04/10 10:35:04
Modified:.index.html
Log:
rollback.
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +1 -3 newsite/index.html
Index: index.html
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/jboss/new
Toby Allsopp wrote:
> Hi. First, this is question for the jboss-user list. This list is for
> discussion of the development of JBoss itself.
Uh-huh. To quote myself "... where IN THE CODE can I ...". I didn't
think that the JBoss user list would be intimately familiar with the
JBoss source
Scott M Stark wrote:
> MD5 is available in Java2 with the bundled sun security provider. You can
> create the MD5 hash and use it in place of the clear text password. MD5
> is a one-way hash so you can't recover the clear text password. None of the
> resources you've listed below will accept an M
Hi Geeks
The "FOR UPDATE" is not always necessary as like in Oracle you
have a sequence generator delivering you an unique ID.
For the other DBs it is maybe better to use a DB procedure or
function to generate an unique ID than use a SQL Statement.
Have fun - Andy
> -Original Message-
It doesn't go anywhere in JBoss, because it is not
part of it.
JBoss kicks off a JettyService (this IS configured in
jboss.conf and DOES comply with JBoss' lifecycle
interface).
JettyService kicks off a JettyMBean which subsequently
kicks off e.g. HttpListeners, WebApplicationContexts
etc which
Hi guys,
I have written an advanced key generator for ejbs
(http://ejbutils.sourceforge.net/). I would like to possibly have it
blundled with JBoss. For this however, I need a database that supports "FOR
UPDATE" sql clauses or transactions with serializable isolation level.
>From what I know, Hy
Maybe instead of seperate binaries, include a *nix script that can set
proper permissions for all the jBoss distribution files?
Jim
--On Tuesday, April 10, 2001 10:37 AM -0500 danch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Replying to dev.
>
> Should we have separate Unix vs. Windows binaries, just to ens
Have you tried putting the jetty stuff in jboss.conf rather than
jboss.jcml? I believe (but I'm not a JMX expert) that the Service
(init,start,stop,destroy) only applies to mbeans listed in jboss.jcml,
not those in jboss.conf.
Julian Gosnell wrote:
>
> Greg has released JettyJMX, a packaged whi
Replying to dev.
Should we have separate Unix vs. Windows binaries, just to ensure that
we get things like this (and the line ending thing) right?
-danch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Should I post this here or to dev?
>
> run.sh doesn't default to have execute permissions which is easy to fix
Howdy,
Thank you guys very much for finding the problem to that bug that shows up
under load. I have been trying to get our company to use JBoss instead of
WebLogic and your guys' prompt attention impressed our CIO very very much.
I was wondering when you are planning on relea
Greg has released JettyJMX, a packaged which
integrates with Jetty in order that all major
components of Jetty become MBeans.
I have been integrating this into jboss_jetty, so that
Jetty is now listed by the JMX agent as a collection
of services, all with published interfaces, instead of
one meg
Stephan,
Thanks for the info. After looking into it some more, we found another
solution that worked really well, we migrated to PostgreSQL yesterday
morning ;-)
Thanks for the help.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Steph
for what it is worth, the notion of pools becomes a bit moot for stateless
objects (the capsule). The VM should be able to create and collect the
instances of TX you throw at it.
Pools also lead to complex code (Cleaning up in a lock like you describe),
and while it will work, we end up with slo
User: pra
Date: 01/04/10 03:41:17
Modified:src/docs howtomdb.xml
Log:
Changed some erounous deployment descriptor examples
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +315 -312 manual/src/docs/howtomdb.xml
Index: howtomdb.xml
=
User: gropi
Date: 01/04/10 02:46:41
Modified:src/docs jbossintro.xml
Log:
title cosmetics
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +2 -2 manual/src/docs/jbossintro.xml
Index: jbossintro.xml
===
RCS fi
System:
jboss2.0
jdk1.3
win2000
mysql 3.23
Jboss is working great!
But when I do a findbyall it is always returning EMPTY
collections.
The entites are accessed /wrapped by simple stateless session beans. When accessing
one particualar bean with findbyprimarykey there is no problem - only
Try now.
-- Juha
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Bill Burke wrote:
> I don't seem to have permission to add a task at the sourceforge site
> even though I have rw access. Does it work?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Bill
>
>
>
> ___
> Jboss-development mailing list
Hi,
I would like to add a small (well a big for me) feature to Entity EJB 1.1 in
CMP mode.
Dirk Zimmermann has already make some changes for that and I would like to
extend them.
I also would like your opinion on that.
We could call it "Nested Properties in CMP".
Current State
-
When
83 matches
Mail list logo
