Number of tests run: 748
Successful tests: 735
Errors:12
Failures: 1
[time of test: 14 May 2002 8:1 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_02]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.]
Bugs item #550574, was opened at 2002-04-30 10:31
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=550574&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Rejected
Priority: 5
Submitted By: reyntjens (d_reyntjens)
Assign
Bugs item #555764, was opened at 2002-05-14 08:07
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=555764&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
Assigned to: Nobo
Bugs item #555764, was opened at 2002-05-14 16:07
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=555764&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
Assigned to: Nobo
Number of tests run: 757
Successful tests: 745
Errors:11
Failures: 1
[time of test: 14 May 2002 6:25 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_03]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.]
Bugs item #550606, was opened at 2002-04-30 08:00
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=550606&group_id=22866
>Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
>Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Daniel Moos (moosi_1978)
>Assi
Bugs item #56, was opened at 2002-05-13 12:57
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=56&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeff DeLong (jeffdelong)
>Assigned t
Bugs item #553916, was opened at 2002-05-08 16:56
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=553916&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: rm (tols)
>Assigned to: Dain Sundstr
Bugs item #551102, was opened at 2002-05-01 13:05
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=551102&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
>Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: frederik sauer (fredsa)
>Assign
Bugs item #550574, was opened at 2002-04-30 05:31
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=550574&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Rejected
Priority: 5
Submitted By: reyntjens (d_reyntjens)
Assi
Bugs item #549415, was opened at 2002-04-27 02:48
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=549415&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dirk Bogun (dshogun)
>Assigne
Number of tests run: 757
Successful tests: 753
Errors:3
Failures: 1
[time of test: 14 May 2002 4:45 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Blackdown Java-Linux Team]
Bugs item #56, was opened at 2002-05-13 11:57
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=56&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeff DeLong (jeffdelong)
Assigned to
Number of tests run: 757
Successful tests: 745
Errors:11
Failures: 1
[time of test: 14 May 2002 3:19 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Blackdown Java-Linux Team
This is a user question, please repost to the users list or in the db
forum, and I will help you there.
-dain
Stephen Coy wrote:
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I think I have found a bug when specifying your own finder method with
> EJB QL and Oracle.
>
> The problem i
Begin forwarded message:
Hi All,
I think I have found a bug when specifying your own finder method with EJB QL and Oracle.
The problem is that in EJB QL any comparisons to a boolean field must be made using the keywords TRUE or FALSE. When I do this I get an exception come back fromOracle
Number of tests run: 750
Successful tests: 735
Errors:4
Failures: 11
[time of test: 14 May 2002 1:2 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
[java.vm.
Will it be possible to set up a CVS get + build + tests on HPUX, as
Chris has done for Linux?
thanks for your efforts,
danch
Duarte Loreto wrote:
> Hello!
>
> After a lot of help from Chris Kimpton (many thanks), I've setup and run
> the tests over JBoss Branch_3_0 on a HP-UX U 9000/800 wi
Andreas Schaefer wrote:
> Currently we are looking into using XSLT to
> convert the vendor specific DDs to JBoss specific
> DDs.
We are going to need more then XSLT, but it may work well for a first phase.
> Challanges are:
> - WL CMP mapping
I can help with advice on this, but won't have
Sacha Labourey wrote:
> Andreas,
>
> Your idea is excellent. Furthermore, thanks to pluggable deployer, anyone
> that doesn't need it can remove this WL deployer (or anyone that needs it
> can add it...). I think that the biggest difficulties will be:
> - stay in synch with WL deployment d
Hello!
After a lot of help from Chris Kimpton (many thanks), I've setup and run the
tests over JBoss Branch_3_0 on a HP-UX U 9000/800 with the B11.00 OS version
and using JDK 1.3.1.02.
JBoss code was from a CVS checkout from (+/-) 2002/05/13 01h00a.m. GMT.
I'll try to run this tests more o
Bugs item #56, was opened at 2002-05-13 11:57
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=56&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeff DeLong (jeffdelong)
Assigned to
Bugs item #56, was opened at 2002-05-13 11:57
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=56&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeff DeLong (jeffdelong)
Assigned to
Hi Geeks
That is my last post to User-List so everyone
interested in creating a WL-emulator please
register (if not already done) to the developer-list
(see www.sf.net/projects/jboss).
Design ideas:
- JBoss deployer (not quite sure yet which one)
figures out that this is not a JBoss applicatio
You can give the testsuite a ".ant.properties" file overriding the
servername. I've got a config that I use to run marathon on my laptop
against my 'big' machine at home. I can send this out this evening, if
anyone is interested. Unfortunately I don't have that stuff with me
right now.
As far
On 2002.05.13 12:34:32 -0400 Stephen Davidson wrote:
> Hi David.
>
> That file is in fact present in my build directory. So why it is being
> ignored, I have no idea.
I noticed I have a xml/catalog file in my home directory. Possibly this is
helping ant resolve the dtd?? I have a permanen
On man, 2002-05-13 at 18:42, Andreas Schaefer wrote:
> Hi Alex
>
> > Won't it make development for WL more preferable?
>
> I don't think so. I think this tool is our "second chance".
> After a "stupid" manager decide to use WL just because
> to "protect his job" we can go during or after develop
Andreas,
Your idea is excellent. Furthermore, thanks to pluggable deployer, anyone
that doesn't need it can remove this WL deployer (or anyone that needs it
can add it...). I think that the biggest difficulties will be:
- stay in synch with WL deployment descriptor evolution (the same for
Hi Alex
> Won't it make development for WL more preferable?
I don't think so. I think this tool is our "second chance".
After a "stupid" manager decide to use WL just because
to "protect his job" we can go during or after development
and show him in seconds that this works with JBoss the
same wa
Hi David.
That file is in fact present in my build directory. So why it is being ignored, I
have no idea. I am using the ALL target for the moment due to
some patches that I have put in. I need to rebuild the Jetty library. Is there a
target that would just build the JBoss server (all piec
Won't it make development for WL more preferable?
AS> Hi Geeks
AS> I am trying to create a BEA Weblogic emulator therefore
AS> that a BEA Weblogic client can drop its JAR/WAR/EAR
AS> (before running it through "ejbc") in JBoss and it would
AS> deploy like a JBoss archive.
AS> Imagine a develope
> I added two beans to test the run-as identity propagation and
> deployed a sample ear to the j2ee1.3_01 reference implementation and
> setup the CallerBean to invoke the CalleeBean with the ejb-jar.xml
> descriptor shown below. The ri behavior differs in 2 ways from our
> current implement
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Currently we are binding to "jmx::rmi" which is fine when you are
> working with the localhost, but will start to cause problems once used in a
> multi-host environment.
>
...
>
> So for a client on a remote host to correctly make use of the deployer.sh
As I see it, most of the work needs to be at deploy time, converting
and processing the WL specific XML config files. If that's the case,
then a few extra seconds (minute?) to start up isn't a great price to
pay for the convenience. Any additional adaptor classes could sit
inside a deploy time SAR
Hi Sean
> Might it not make more sense to make a tool to extract the contents of the
> jars,
> modify them to run on jboss, and produce a new jboss compatible jar? That
> way the
> jboss code base wont get bogged down with a load of stuff a lot of users
> will never
> go near. (don't take it as a
Might it not make more sense to make a tool to extract the contents of the
jars,
modify them to run on jboss, and produce a new jboss compatible jar? That
way the
jboss code base wont get bogged down with a load of stuff a lot of users
will never
go near. (don't take it as a criticism, the idea
>From: "Andreas Schaefer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Hiram Chirino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JMX RMI Adapter & JNDI binding
>Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 08:26:36 -0700
>
>Hi Hiram
>
> > I think that you can just default it to jmx:rmi
Hi
> Would be cool, but how would you handle CMP-related issues? For example,
> my project uses WebGain TopLink (*shiver*) and last I checked it didn't
support
> JBoss...
Good question and currently I don't know. For now
I just want to make the easiest way happening:
- WL JAR files with WL own
Hi Jason
> Can someone point me to the spec where it states where in JNDI the JMX RMI
> adapter should be bound to.
Because otherwise no client can find the JMX RMI-Adapter except for the
local
client.
> Currently we are binding to "jmx::rmi" which is fine when you
are
> working with the localh
Hi Geeks
I am trying to create a BEA Weblogic emulator therefore
that a BEA Weblogic client can drop its JAR/WAR/EAR
(before running it through "ejbc") in JBoss and it would
deploy like a JBoss archive.
Imagine a developer can go to his/her boss and show
him/her that their developed application r
Hi Hiram
> I think that you can just default it to jmx:rmi and give allow the
location
> of the bind to be configurable.
>
> So when you have 2 jmx servers using the same JNDI service, then that
> problem is solved by having second jmx server can bind to something like
> server2/jmx:rmi
But how
I think that you can just default it to jmx:rmi and give allow the location
of the bind to be configurable.
So when you have 2 jmx servers using the same JNDI service, then that
problem is solved by having second jmx server can bind to something like
server2/jmx:rmi
Regards,
Hiram
>From: "
Hi Alex
I will move this message to DEBUG level because it is only indicating
that the JSR-77 server module is not available then (this is because the
MBean is not created then).
Andy
- Original Message -
From: "Alex Loubyansky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "JBoss-Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Se
Bugs item #554653, was opened at 2002-05-10 14:54
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=554653&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Open
Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Wolfangel (swolfang
Bugs item #555383, was opened at 2002-05-13 03:20
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=555383&group_id=22866
Category: Build System
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ernst de Haan (znerd)
Assigned to:
Cuurent cvs version of JBoss3.1.0alpha produces this error on start
up:
DEBUG [org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer] found 0 subpackages of
file:/C:/jboss-3.1.0alpha/server/default/conf/jboss-service.xml
DEBUG [org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer] Watching new file:
file:/C:/jboss-3.1.0alpha/server
Bugs item #555383, was opened at 2002-05-13 10:20
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=555383&group_id=22866
Category: Build System
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ernst de Haan (znerd)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #555381, was opened at 2002-05-13 10:15
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=555381&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Laurence Smith (lasmith)
Assigned
Great,
Thanks scott.
F*ck Class.forName()!
CGJ
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Mai 2002 08:49
An: 'Jboss-Development'
Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] Anyone doing https in JBoss using jsse ?
This is done in now in the 3.0 and h
Number of tests run: 757
Successful tests: 744
Errors:11
Failures: 2
[time of test: 13 May 2002 9:9 GMT]
[java.version: 1.4.0]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.]
[ja
Bugs item #555070, was opened at 2002-05-12 20:49
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=555070&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dylan van Iersel (dviersel)
Assigned to: Nob
51 matches
Mail list logo
