Hello,
unfortunately that the Forums are not working anymore, otherwise i would
have to ask this question on the list, heck i should have saved the
message,
The question is :
can anybody post the jboss.jcml config part i need to be able to contact
a MQSeries server and queues from JBoss-2
Bugs item #562884, was opened at 2002-05-31 12:03
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=562884&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.1
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Dr. Christoph Georg Jung (cgjung)
Assign
Bugs item #563384, was opened at 2002-06-01 20:56
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=563384&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.1
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm)
Assigned to: David J
Number of tests run: 754
Successful tests: 725
Errors:24
Failures: 5
[time of test: 12 June 2002 1:47 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
[java.v
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.3.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edi
According to Scott the subscription was updated today. It should be
available soon.
-dain
Brandon Knitter wrote:
> I have the 6 month subscription. Has the CMP documentation in that package been
> updated as well? Should I download the AllDocumentation.zip again?
>
>
___
Number of tests run: 754
Successful tests: 725
Errors:25
Failures: 4
[time of test: 12 June 2002 0:45 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
[java.v
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.3.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edi
I have the 6 month subscription. Has the CMP documentation in that package been
updated as well? Should I download the AllDocumentation.zip again?
--
-bk
Quoting Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> JBossCMP documentation for the JBoss 3.0 release is now available at
> FlashLine.
>
>
htt
JBossCMP documentation for the JBoss 3.0 release is now available at
FlashLine.
http://www.flashline.com/Components/View.jsp?&prodid=4312&sid=1023835518484-3492430314-51
The documentation has been vastly expand (now ~75 pages), a new
Optimized Loading chapter has been added, and it contains co
Patches item #567645, was opened at 2002-06-11 23:21
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=567645&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Frank Langelage (lafr)
Assigned t
Bugs item #563360, was opened at 2002-06-01 14:28
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=563360&group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Pending
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Koen Serry (koen_se
If it's 2.4, the META-INF/jboss-service.xml doesn't apply. Make sure you get
them all in jboss.jcml (there are 4 I think).
What MBean/Service is throwing the exception?
#mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jonathan Cowherd
Sent: Tuesday
Bill,
a belgian student did a comparison on JBoss/WebLogic and i helped him on
the JBoss part, i have his thesis as PDF if you would be interested.
Werner
Bill Burke wrote:
> I remember somebody doing research on this. Can anybody help here?
>
> Bill
>
> ___
Here's a starting point:
http://www.flashline.com/components/appservermatrix.jsp
--
Bill Burke wrote:
> I remember somebody doing research on this. Can anybody help here?
>
> Bill
___
Multimillion Dollar Computer Inventory
Live Web
Number of tests run: 609
Successful tests: 606
Errors:2
Failures: 1
[time of test: 11 June 2002 12:36 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
[j
I remember somebody doing research on this. Can anybody help here?
Bill
___
Multimillion Dollar Computer Inventory
Live Webcast Auctions Thru Aug. 2002 - http://www.cowanalexander.com/calendar
__
Bugs item #497955, was opened at 2001-12-30 17:17
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=497955&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Frank Langelage (lafr)
Assigned
Bugs item #497955, was opened at 2001-12-30 17:17
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=497955&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
>Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Frank Langelage (lafr)
>Assigne
I agree a type safe enum is the best solution here. I can implement
this unless someone else wants to do it.
-dain
Scott M Stark wrote:
> This doesn't work with serialization. You need to introduce an
> enum pattern with object replacement handling to ensure identity
> mapping to the final st
> Scott, we need to get JBossPerf running.
>
I started porting CSIRO's JBoss ECPerf. I got it running with Oracle sort
of. I still need to tweak the Oracle configuration. I haven't been able to
get back to this for awhile since I've been busy. I won't be able to get
back to it for a couple of
This doesn't work with serialization. You need to introduce an
enum pattern with object replacement handling to ensure identity
mapping to the final string within a vm.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
How about using strings that are the result of calling intern on the
original string? Then we can use == rather than equals. It probably won't
make up for serialization overhead for remote calls, but should speed
things up in-vm.
david jencks
On 2002.06.11 13:48:47 -0400 Scott M Stark wrote:
>
JBoss-2.4.4_with_Tomcat-3.2.3 :)
Thanks for the tip. I'll look in the META-INF jboss-service file
first.
Jonathan Paul Cowherd
Linux and Java Administrator
Genscape, Inc.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (502) 583-3730
-Original Message-
From: Mike Finn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
I agree. Was this a performance problem? I Marc changed this because
String based hashtables were very slot. If that is true, we could use
the class I suggested to avoid obfuscation, but use a CRC32 of the name
for comparison (which is unique enough).
Again, I think we should use a String u
So in addition to obfuscating the useful String value the uniqueness is
also lost. Let's go back to the String and both problems are solved.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Dain Sundstrom"
I suppose this is a problem when you serialize the Invocation.
Nevermind the change I suggested.
-dain
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> In org.jboss.invocation.Invocation we have many keys defined as follows:
>
> public static final Integer ENTERPRISE_CONTEXT =
> new Integer("ENTERPRISE_CONTEXT"
In org.jboss.invocation.Invocation we have many keys defined as follows:
public static final Integer ENTERPRISE_CONTEXT =
new Integer("ENTERPRISE_CONTEXT".hashCode());
The problem here is we are using an Integer and it can actually be equal
to another key someone may insert. This is not
> confirm 896810
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -
http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink
___
Jboss-d
You can safely ignore that message.
-- Juha
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Ram Ramesh wrote:
> Hi all,
> Is this a JMX bug? or is it a configuration issue?
>
> --Ram
> ---
> [09:43:45,208,ConfigurationService] Deployers set to
> J
Bugs item #563360, was opened at 2002-06-01 14:28
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=563360&group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Pending
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Koen Serry (koen_se
Hi all,
Is this a JMX bug? or is it a configuration issue?
--Ram
---
[09:43:45,208,ConfigurationService] Deployers set to
J2EE:service=J2eeDeployer;
JCA:service=RARDeployer in EJB:service=AutoDeployer
[09:43:45,213,Configura
Bugs item #567302, was opened at 2002-06-11 03:29
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=567302&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mauro Migliardi (mmiglia)
>Assigned
Bugs item #567441, was opened at 2002-06-11 10:27
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=567441&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andras Soltesz (soltesz_andras)
>Ass
Jonathan,
Either HTTP or JMX-HTML adaptor is causing the address in use error.
If you are talking about 3.0 (you didn't specify - tisk, tisk :-) ), those
config files are not in conf. You will need to update the
META-INF/jboss-service.xml in these sars, with the desired ports:
jetty-plugin.sar
jm
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 16:46, Bill Burke wrote:
> I will email other subscribers to see if they had similar problems.
>
> The Unix version was tested and works on Linux 7.2. What OS are you running
> on?
Debian unstable.
>
> Bill
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
Bugs item #567441, was opened at 2002-06-11 17:27
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=567441&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andras Soltesz (soltesz_andras)
Assi
Oh and one more thing about the installer.
It is a bit more than a glorified zip. You can decide what components are
installed(Clustering, IIOP, JMS, etc.) and it will build the appropriate
configuration. We will be expanding the features of this installer over the
next few releases of the CD s
I'm attempting to setup JBoss to run different instances on different IP
addresses or different ports.
1) I've attempted change the port numbers in the following files:
jboss.jcml
jndi.properties
standardjboss.xml
Now I get an error that says that there is a
I will email other subscribers to see if they had similar problems.
The Unix version was tested and works on Linux 7.2. What OS are you running
on?
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Marius Kotsbak
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 20
I got this:
org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException: ejb-ref ejb/Security, expected
either ejb-link in ejb-jar.xml or jndi-name in jboss.xml
while deploying.
though I do not specify ejb-link, but i specified jndi-name for this
ejb-reference in jboss.xml.
what is wrong?
I am using JBoss_3_0_0
Bugs item #567381, was opened at 2002-06-11 12:34
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=567381&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Simon Stewart (shs96c)
Assigned t
Bugs item #567349, was opened at 2002-06-11 12:44
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=567349&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bruno Lamouret (qjafcunuas)
Assigned to: No
I got the cd today, and tried the graphical installer, but it does'nt
seem to work. Error:
sh jboss.bin
: command not found
: command not found
Preparing to install...
: command not found
jboss.bin: line 84: syntax error near unexpected token `elif'
'boss.bin: line 84: `elif [ -x /usr/bin/ls ];
Bugs item #567302, was opened at 2002-06-11 08:29
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=567302&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mauro Migliardi (mmiglia)
Assigned t
Number of tests run: 609
Successful tests: 606
Errors:2
Failures: 1
[time of test: 11 June 2002 0:29 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
[ja
46 matches
Mail list logo
