Is this possible to include for jboss4? A simple accounting mechanism
with threads and groups/realms/whatever , with a jni interface and C
code which compiles to each paltform type?
Rhett Aultman wrote:
Not pure Java, no, but there are some reasonably portable native code tricks that
can get
Bugs item #613137, was opened at 2002-09-23 13:13
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=613137group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Oskari Kettunen (aok)
Assigned to:
Hi Scott,
Excellent - this was just what I was looking for, but didn't realise it
already existed.
I'll check this out pronto.
Many thanks,
Phil
-Original Message-
From: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 September 2002 18:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL
I believe it's possible, but I'm still plugging at it. My graduate school preparation
has, as of late, been sucking my life dry on many fronts. There is already a good
profiler out there in reasonably portable C++, and I have a mechanism for tying it to
an MBean.
-Original Message-
Bugs item #613214, was opened at 2002-09-23 16:11
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=613214group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 9
Submitted By: Christian Riege (lqd)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #613225, was opened at 2002-09-23 14:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=613225group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Doornbosch (pieterpeter)
Occurs under JBoss 3.2.0-beta,
Windows2000 or NT4.0,
Sun jdk 1.3.1_01 *and* 1.4.1-beta.
Today I posted in jboss-user about a memory leak problem.
investigating further I am suspecting that some thread handling
in jboss must trigger a known bug of the sun jdk.
If you create a thread and have no
I increased the log-level to debug, and found that exactly at the time
the thread counts increase (and become more inconsistent), there was the
message:
2002-09-23 18:13:10,015 DEBUG
[org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.IdleRemover] run: IdleRemover
notifying pools, interval: 45
Any chance Scott or Alain can take a look at this? I think Josh Davis and a
few others have been clamoring for this as well.
thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Simpson, Mike W
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 3:34 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [JBoss-dev]
This is rather strange since there is supposed to be one IdleRemover thread
systemwide. I'll take a look. Can you give me any more hints on how to
count threads?
thanks
david jencks
On 2002.09.23 12:45:04 -0400 Michael Bartmann wrote:
I increased the log-level to debug, and found that
I don't thought that the IdleRemover itself has a problem.
I thought the managed connections must somehow incorporate a thread.
The number of threads which got lost was always a multiple of
the listed LocalManagedConnectionFactorys (which always was a
multiple of 5).
Anyway, I attach my
Bugs item #613349, was opened at 2002-09-23 13:34
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=613349group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dain Sundstrom (dsundstrom)
Assigned to:
I wonder a lot if I am the only person for which the
ThreadGroup.activecount() has such a big difference to the
handcounted threaddump? (in my case 3600 to 200)
Cry out loud if you experience similar things.
Wondering...
Michael Bartmann
Michael Bartmann wrote:
I increased the log-level to
No, I have no time for this right now. Remy Maucherat will be looking
at it shortly.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Simpson, Mike W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
Bugs item #613360, was opened at 2002-09-23 14:00
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=613360group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dain Sundstrom (dsundstrom)
Assigned to:
Scott M Stark wrote:
No, I have no time for this right now. Remy Maucherat will be looking
at it shortly.
I plan to help out after Tomcat 4.1.12 is out of the door (it should be
tomorrow). Given that 4.1 includes a lot of performance improvements, as
well as the new Jasper 2, it should be
Bugs item #604916, was opened at 2002-09-05 02:17
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=604916group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Lee Schumacher (lelliot)
Assigned
Bugs item #609212, was opened at 2002-09-14 03:39
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=609212group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: HauJye Tan (haujye)
Assigned
Bugs item #601866, was opened at 2002-08-29 08:39
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=601866group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Baillieul (baillieul)
Assigned to: Dain
Bugs item #613360, was opened at 2002-09-23 14:00
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=613360group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dain Sundstrom (dsundstrom)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #592855, was opened at 2002-08-08 17:23
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=592855group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Gerald Turner (crazyfoam)
Bugs item #592855, was opened at 2002-08-08 15:23
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=592855group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Gerald Turner (crazyfoam)
when i run tests target of test-suite i got some strange failures like :
expected : Wed Dec 31 21:00:01 BRT 1969 but was
Wed Dec 31 21:00:01 BRT 1969 (indented to make sure the equality)
is this normal???
--
| Emerson Cargnin |
|
sorry, i posted before without subject...
when i run tests target of test-suite i got some strange failures like :
expected : Wed Dec 31 21:00:01 BRT 1969 but was
Wed Dec 31 21:00:01 BRT 1969 (indented to make sure the equality)
is this normal???
--
No I was never able to figure it out. It only happens sporadically though.
No one ever responded my messages either.
.peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-user] JBossMQ
Number of tests run: 931
Successful tests: 925
Errors:2
Failures: 4
[time of test: 23 September 2002 15:17 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer,
it looks that NetSaint is now in development as Nagios
(http://www.nagios.org/)
I only have two requests... 1) make the interface/page/whatever easily
queried (via Perl preferably) and 2)make it part of the standard jboss
distribution.
For monitoring I'm going to want to write a plugin
Number of tests run: 957
Successful tests: 930
Errors:20
Failures: 7
[time of test: 24 September 2002 2:15 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_03]
[java.vendor: Sun
Do we run daily tests on 1.4 anymore?
Is anyone running in production on 1.4?
Thanks
-dain
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Do we run daily tests on 1.4 anymore?
Is anyone running in production on 1.4?
We are. But we use 3.2, where there is no daily test anyway.
Biggest issues:
- memory leak
- Clients with 1.3 fail to connect to JMS-OIL-Topics, but succeed with JMS-RMI-Topics
Regards,
30 matches
Mail list logo
