Scott M Stark wrote:
> No, I have no time for this right now. Remy Maucherat will be looking
> at it shortly.

I plan to help out after Tomcat 4.1.12 is out of the door (it should be 
tomorrow). Given that 4.1 includes a lot of performance improvements, as 
well as the new Jasper 2, it should be worth it.

Remy

>>Any chance Scott or Alain can take a look at this?  I think Josh Davis and a
>>few others have been clamoring for this as well.
>>
>>thanks,
>>Mike
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Simpson, Mike W 
>>Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 3:34 PM
>>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>>Subject: [JBoss-dev] JBoss3.2-Tomcat4.1.10
>>
>>
>>
>>For a variety of 'business reasons', we're running tomcat instead of jetty,
>>and would very much benefit from being on the 4.1.10 release.  I've been
>>working on getting  jboss 3.2 integrate with tomcat 4.10, and for the most
>>part, it's an easy upgrade.
>>
>>On 9/16, I checked out Branch_3_2, and pulled Tomcat 4.1.10 from Apache.
>>org.apache.catalina.util.xml has been deprecated and removed, in favor of
>>Apache's commons digester package.  Rather than port all of the xml digester
>>code, I jarred up the old package, added to build classpaths, and all but a
>>handful of compilation errors were removed.  The following additional
>>changes were necessary to get the bundle to build:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> 
> 




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to