[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.3.1_03 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1_03-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.3.1_03-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: Executing: /home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/tools/bin/ant -logger org.apache.tools.ant.NoBannerLogger -Dinstall.id=testbuild release Buildfile: build.xml _buildmagic:init: Trying to override old definition of task property BUILD FAILED file:/disk/orig/home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/build/../tools/etc/buildfragments/tools.ent:29: taskdef class xdoclet.modules.jmx.JMXDocletTask cannot be found Total time: 5 seconds --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] jboss-all daily clean failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: Executing: /home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/tools/bin/ant -logger org.apache.tools.ant.NoBannerLogger clean Buildfile: build.xml _buildmagic:init: Trying to override old definition of task property BUILD FAILED file:/disk/orig/home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/build/../tools/etc/buildfragments/tools.ent:29: taskdef class xdoclet.modules.jmx.JMXDocletTask cannot be found Total time: 7 seconds --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss3.2-Tomcat4.1.10
Liam Magee wrote: Hi Thomas, I haven't looked deeply into Tomcat MBean support, this is the next natural step for integration b/w JBoss and Tomcat. I think it would be beneficial to stop using Embedded eventually (whatever JBoss needs to do should be doable using a host configurator and similar hooks), so that little or no code duplication is needed. I'll make changes on the Tomcat side (either in future 4.1.x releases, or in Tomcat 5.0.x) and the JBoss/Tomcat build script to allow customizing the classloader and directory structure if people are interested in getting an integration with a neater packaging ala Jetty/JBoss (many components and libraries are also not useful to JBoss and could be removed, thus making the download archive much smaller). Remy --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: Executing: /home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/tools/bin/ant -logger org.apache.tools.ant.NoBannerLogger -Dinstall.id=testbuild release Buildfile: build.xml _buildmagic:init: Trying to override old definition of task property BUILD FAILED file:/disk/orig/home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/build/../tools/etc/buildfragments/tools.ent:29: taskdef class xdoclet.modules.jmx.JMXDocletTask cannot be found Total time: 6 seconds --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss3.2-Tomcat4.1.10
This would be excellent if you could do this Nick Remy Maucherat wrote: Liam Magee wrote: Hi Thomas, I haven't looked deeply into Tomcat MBean support, this is the next natural step for integration b/w JBoss and Tomcat. I think it would be beneficial to stop using Embedded eventually (whatever JBoss needs to do should be doable using a host configurator and similar hooks), so that little or no code duplication is needed. I'll make changes on the Tomcat side (either in future 4.1.x releases, or in Tomcat 5.0.x) and the JBoss/Tomcat build script to allow customizing the classloader and directory structure if people are interested in getting an integration with a neater packaging ala Jetty/JBoss (many components and libraries are also not useful to JBoss and could be removed, thus making the download archive much smaller). Remy --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] jboss-all daily clean failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.3.1_03 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1_03-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.3.1_03-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: Executing: /home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/tools/bin/ant -logger org.apache.tools.ant.NoBannerLogger clean Buildfile: build.xml _buildmagic:init: Trying to override old definition of task property BUILD FAILED file:/disk/orig/home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/build/../tools/etc/buildfragments/tools.ent:29: taskdef class xdoclet.modules.jmx.JMXDocletTask cannot be found Total time: 7 seconds --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.3.1_03 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1_03-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.3.1_03-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: Executing: /home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/tools/bin/ant -logger org.apache.tools.ant.NoBannerLogger -Dinstall.id=testbuild release Buildfile: build.xml _buildmagic:init: Trying to override old definition of task property BUILD FAILED file:/disk/orig/home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/build/../tools/etc/buildfragments/tools.ent:29: taskdef class xdoclet.modules.jmx.JMXDocletTask cannot be found Total time: 5 seconds --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] jboss-all daily clean failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: Executing: /home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/tools/bin/ant -logger org.apache.tools.ant.NoBannerLogger clean Buildfile: build.xml _buildmagic:init: Trying to override old definition of task property BUILD FAILED file:/disk/orig/home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/build/../tools/etc/buildfragments/tools.ent:29: taskdef class xdoclet.modules.jmx.JMXDocletTask cannot be found Total time: 7 seconds --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: Executing: /home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/tools/bin/ant -logger org.apache.tools.ant.NoBannerLogger -Dinstall.id=testbuild release Buildfile: build.xml _buildmagic:init: Trying to override old definition of task property BUILD FAILED file:/disk/orig/home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/build/../tools/etc/buildfragments/tools.ent:29: taskdef class xdoclet.modules.jmx.JMXDocletTask cannot be found Total time: 6 seconds --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] jboss-all daily clean failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.3.1_03 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1_03-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.3.1_03-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: Executing: /home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/tools/bin/ant -logger org.apache.tools.ant.NoBannerLogger clean Buildfile: build.xml _buildmagic:init: Trying to override old definition of task property BUILD FAILED file:/disk/orig/home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/build/../tools/etc/buildfragments/tools.ent:29: taskdef class xdoclet.modules.jmx.JMXDocletTask cannot be found Total time: 7 seconds --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] jboss-all daily clean failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-614116 ] Oracle XA pooling/repeated rollback
Bugs item #614116, was opened at 2002-09-24 17:56
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=614116group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Elias Ross (genman)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Oracle XA pooling/repeated rollback
Initial Comment:
I've been trying to isolate some problems I've been
having with transaction roll-backs and message-driven
beans. Basically, when a transaction is rolled-back
a number of times in the onMessage() body
(by calling MessageDrivenContext.setRollbackOnly()
5-10 times in succession),
the message is re-delivered to the MDB, but the Oracle
Connection is no longer in a good state.
This problem manifests itself when using a very small
connection pool (say 1-5) connections.
Example code snippet:
public void onMessage(javax.jms.Message jmsMessage)
{
Connection c = null;
try {
TextMessage tm = (TextMessage)jmsMessage;
String text = tm.getText();
c = ds.getConnection();
PreparedStatement s = c.prepareStatement(insert into test values (?));
s.setString(1, text);
s.executeUpdate();
mdc.setRollbackOnly();
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new EJBException(e);
} finally {
if (c != null) {
try { c.close(); }
catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
First I see it works for a few times. It rolls-back successfully
about 5 or 6 times. Then, for no reason, I see:
15:50:44,922 WARN [TxCapsule] XAException: tx=XidImpl [FormatId=257,
GlobalId=eross.m-qube.com//4,
BranchQual=] errorCode=XAER_RMERR
javax.transaction.xa.XAException
at oracle.jdbc.xa.OracleXAResource.allowGlobalTxnModeOnly(OracleXAResource.java:1069)
at oracle.jdbc.xa.OracleXAResource.suspendStacked(OracleXAResource.java:296)
at oracle.jdbc.xa.client.OracleXAResource.end(OracleXAResource.java:381)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.endResource(TxCapsule.java:1237)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.delistResource(TxCapsule.java:579)
at org.jboss.tm.TransactionImpl.delistResource(TransactionImpl.java:92)
at
org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.XATxConnectionManager$XAConnectionEventListener.delist(XATxConnectionManager.java:284)
at
org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.XATxConnectionManager$XAConnectionEventListener.connectionClosed(XATxConnectionManager.java:331)
at
org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.BaseManagedConnection.fireConnectionEvent(BaseManagedConnection.java:152)
at
org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.xa.XAManagedConnection.fireConnectionEvent(XAManagedConnection.java:215)
at
org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.xa.XAManagedConnection$1.connectionClosed(XAManagedConnection.java:127)
at
oracle.jdbc.pool.OraclePooledConnection.callListener(OraclePooledConnection.java:482)
at
oracle.jdbc.pool.OraclePooledConnection.logicalClose(OraclePooledConnection.java:445)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleConnection.logicalClose(OracleConnection.java:2900)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleConnection.close(OracleConnection.java:1418)
at com.proteusmobile.smx.AMDB.onMessage(AMDB.java:140)
Later:
15:50:44,929 WARN [TxCapsule] XAException: tx=XidImpl [FormatId=257,
GlobalId=eross.m-qube.com//4,
BranchQual=] errorCode=XAER_RMERR
javax.transaction.xa.XAException
at oracle.jdbc.xa.OracleXAResource.allowGlobalTxnModeOnly(OracleXAResource.java:1069)
at oracle.jdbc.xa.OracleXAResource.suspendStacked(OracleXAResource.java:296)
at oracle.jdbc.xa.client.OracleXAResource.end(OracleXAResource.java:381)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.endResource(TxCapsule.java:1237)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.endResources(TxCapsule.java:1312)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.rollback(TxCapsule.java:440)
at org.jboss.tm.TransactionImpl.rollback(TransactionImpl.java:83)
at org.jboss.jms.asf.StdServerSession.onMessage(StdServerSession.java:301)
at
org.jboss.mq.SpyMessageConsumer.sessionConsumerProcessMessage(SpyMessageConsumer.java:603)
at org.jboss.mq.SpyMessageConsumer.addMessage(SpyMessageConsumer.java:417)
at org.jboss.mq.SpySession.run(SpySession.java:259)
at org.jboss.jms.asf.StdServerSession.run(StdServerSession.java:177)
at EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent.PooledExecutor$Worker.run(PooledExecutor.java:655)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479)
And then, I can no longer get a connection:
15:50:44,971 WARN [TxCapsule] XAException: tx=XidImpl [FormatId=257,
GlobalId=eross.m-qube.com//5,
BranchQual=] errorCode=XAER_PROTO
javax.transaction.xa.XAException
at oracle.jdbc.xa.OracleXAResource.disallowLocalTxnMode(OracleXAResource.java:1045)
at oracle.jdbc.xa.client.OracleXAResource.start(OracleXAResource.java:153)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.startResource(TxCapsule.java:1180)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.enlistResource(TxCapsule.java:679)
at org.jboss.tm.TransactionImpl.enlistResource(TransactionImpl.java:102)
at
org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.XATxConnectionManager$XAConnectionEventListener.enlist(XATxConnectionManager.java:262)
at
RE: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed
WTF? marc f -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 8:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed = ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed
It is a new undocummented feature. Cool, huh? -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de marc fleury Envoye : lundi, 7 octobre 2002 14:51 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed WTF? marc f -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 8:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed = ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed
It's the ultimate solution of the build mess - simplify you know :) /Lennart måndagen den 7 oktober 2002 kl 14.55 skrev Sacha Labourey: It is a new undocummented feature. Cool, huh? -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de marc fleury Envoye : lundi, 7 octobre 2002 14:51 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed WTF? marc f -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 8:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed = ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed
= HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory When doing a clean co jboss-all the folder dloaded comes as jboss and not as jboss-all as expected. This probably freaks out some script at lubega ? /peter_f --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] jboss-all daily clean failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.3.1_03 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1_03-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.3.1_03-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.3.1_03 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1_03-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.3.1_03-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss3.2-Tomcat4.1.10
I would be happy to assist with any future integration efforts with Tomcat. Is there a to-do list of any kind for this? Regards, Liam. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Remy Maucherat Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 6:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss3.2-Tomcat4.1.10 Liam Magee wrote: Hi Thomas, I haven't looked deeply into Tomcat MBean support, this is the next natural step for integration b/w JBoss and Tomcat. I think it would be beneficial to stop using Embedded eventually (whatever JBoss needs to do should be doable using a host configurator and similar hooks), so that little or no code duplication is needed. I'll make changes on the Tomcat side (either in future 4.1.x releases, or in Tomcat 5.0.x) and the JBoss/Tomcat build script to allow customizing the classloader and directory structure if people are interested in getting an integration with a neater packaging ala Jetty/JBoss (many components and libraries are also not useful to JBoss and could be removed, thus making the download archive much smaller). Remy --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] jboss-all daily clean failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] HEAD Build: numerous failure
Hello, Is it just me? I am trying to compile jboss-all from HEAD (I did a fresh checkout a few minutes ago) on windows 2000 and I get lots of errors which change over time i.e the compiler (1.4.0) makes an exception and, if I start again the build process, it goes further, ... then it is an RMI compiler errror (couldn't read LOC header), then it is a set of silent break, etc. At the end (after 4-5 restart, it is build successfuly) Cheers, Sacha --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] HEAD and STARTED JMX notification
Hello, In ProxyFactoryHA (which extends ProxyFactory), I subscribe to the STARTED (and STOPPING) JMX notifications that is raised by the related EJB container. Nevertheless, while everything is fine in Branch_3_2, it fails on HEAD: I received the STARTED notification *before* my ProxyFactoryHA.start() is called. Is someone working on this (David?) Cheers, Sacha --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-614116 ] Oracle XA pooling/repeated rollback
Bugs item #614116, was opened at 2002-09-24 19:56
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=614116group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Elias Ross (genman)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Oracle XA pooling/repeated rollback
Initial Comment:
I've been trying to isolate some problems I've been
having with transaction roll-backs and message-driven
beans. Basically, when a transaction is rolled-back
a number of times in the onMessage() body
(by calling MessageDrivenContext.setRollbackOnly()
5-10 times in succession),
the message is re-delivered to the MDB, but the Oracle
Connection is no longer in a good state.
This problem manifests itself when using a very small
connection pool (say 1-5) connections.
Example code snippet:
public void onMessage(javax.jms.Message jmsMessage)
{
Connection c = null;
try {
TextMessage tm = (TextMessage)jmsMessage;
String text = tm.getText();
c = ds.getConnection();
PreparedStatement s = c.prepareStatement(insert into test values (?));
s.setString(1, text);
s.executeUpdate();
mdc.setRollbackOnly();
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new EJBException(e);
} finally {
if (c != null) {
try { c.close(); }
catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
First I see it works for a few times. It rolls-back successfully
about 5 or 6 times. Then, for no reason, I see:
15:50:44,922 WARN [TxCapsule] XAException: tx=XidImpl [FormatId=257,
GlobalId=eross.m-qube.com//4,
BranchQual=] errorCode=XAER_RMERR
javax.transaction.xa.XAException
at oracle.jdbc.xa.OracleXAResource.allowGlobalTxnModeOnly(OracleXAResource.java:1069)
at oracle.jdbc.xa.OracleXAResource.suspendStacked(OracleXAResource.java:296)
at oracle.jdbc.xa.client.OracleXAResource.end(OracleXAResource.java:381)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.endResource(TxCapsule.java:1237)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.delistResource(TxCapsule.java:579)
at org.jboss.tm.TransactionImpl.delistResource(TransactionImpl.java:92)
at
org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.XATxConnectionManager$XAConnectionEventListener.delist(XATxConnectionManager.java:284)
at
org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.XATxConnectionManager$XAConnectionEventListener.connectionClosed(XATxConnectionManager.java:331)
at
org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.BaseManagedConnection.fireConnectionEvent(BaseManagedConnection.java:152)
at
org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.xa.XAManagedConnection.fireConnectionEvent(XAManagedConnection.java:215)
at
org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.xa.XAManagedConnection$1.connectionClosed(XAManagedConnection.java:127)
at
oracle.jdbc.pool.OraclePooledConnection.callListener(OraclePooledConnection.java:482)
at
oracle.jdbc.pool.OraclePooledConnection.logicalClose(OraclePooledConnection.java:445)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleConnection.logicalClose(OracleConnection.java:2900)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleConnection.close(OracleConnection.java:1418)
at com.proteusmobile.smx.AMDB.onMessage(AMDB.java:140)
Later:
15:50:44,929 WARN [TxCapsule] XAException: tx=XidImpl [FormatId=257,
GlobalId=eross.m-qube.com//4,
BranchQual=] errorCode=XAER_RMERR
javax.transaction.xa.XAException
at oracle.jdbc.xa.OracleXAResource.allowGlobalTxnModeOnly(OracleXAResource.java:1069)
at oracle.jdbc.xa.OracleXAResource.suspendStacked(OracleXAResource.java:296)
at oracle.jdbc.xa.client.OracleXAResource.end(OracleXAResource.java:381)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.endResource(TxCapsule.java:1237)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.endResources(TxCapsule.java:1312)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.rollback(TxCapsule.java:440)
at org.jboss.tm.TransactionImpl.rollback(TransactionImpl.java:83)
at org.jboss.jms.asf.StdServerSession.onMessage(StdServerSession.java:301)
at
org.jboss.mq.SpyMessageConsumer.sessionConsumerProcessMessage(SpyMessageConsumer.java:603)
at org.jboss.mq.SpyMessageConsumer.addMessage(SpyMessageConsumer.java:417)
at org.jboss.mq.SpySession.run(SpySession.java:259)
at org.jboss.jms.asf.StdServerSession.run(StdServerSession.java:177)
at EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent.PooledExecutor$Worker.run(PooledExecutor.java:655)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479)
And then, I can no longer get a connection:
15:50:44,971 WARN [TxCapsule] XAException: tx=XidImpl [FormatId=257,
GlobalId=eross.m-qube.com//5,
BranchQual=] errorCode=XAER_PROTO
javax.transaction.xa.XAException
at oracle.jdbc.xa.OracleXAResource.disallowLocalTxnMode(OracleXAResource.java:1045)
at oracle.jdbc.xa.client.OracleXAResource.start(OracleXAResource.java:153)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.startResource(TxCapsule.java:1180)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.enlistResource(TxCapsule.java:679)
at org.jboss.tm.TransactionImpl.enlistResource(TransactionImpl.java:102)
at
org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.XATxConnectionManager$XAConnectionEventListener.enlist(XATxConnectionManager.java:262)
at
[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.3.1_03 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1_03-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.3.1_03-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] jboss-all daily clean failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.3.1_03 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1_03-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.3.1_03-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed
he he he, actual LOL we don't have a build problem anymore, that fucking piece of radioactive dunk just went boom... marc f -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lennart Petersson Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 9:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed It's the ultimate solution of the build mess - simplify you know :) /Lennart måndagen den 7 oktober 2002 kl 14.55 skrev Sacha Labourey: It is a new undocummented feature. Cool, huh? -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de marc fleury Envoye : lundi, 7 octobre 2002 14:51 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed WTF? marc f -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 8:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed = ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed
But seriously now, can anyone get Chris on the line, he needs to clean the disk and checkout... this is embarassing marc f -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lennart Petersson Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 9:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed It's the ultimate solution of the build mess - simplify you know :) /Lennart måndagen den 7 oktober 2002 kl 14.55 skrev Sacha Labourey: It is a new undocummented feature. Cool, huh? -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de marc fleury Envoye : lundi, 7 octobre 2002 14:51 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed WTF? marc f -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 8:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed = ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] jboss-all daily clean failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] jboss-all daily clean failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.3.1_03 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1_03-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.3.1_03-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.3.1_03 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1_03-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.3.1_03-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] jboss-all daily clean failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] Somebody forgot to check in sun-jaxp directories into branch_3_0
BUILD FAILED: Common module ...thirdparty\sun-jaxp\lib not found. Bill --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] Re: [jboss-cvs] contrib/jboss.net build.xml
Whoa, not this nonsense off. The 3.0 build structure is NOT changing. If
it has its going back!!!
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Sacha Labourey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 10:14 AM
Subject: [jboss-cvs] contrib/jboss.net build.xml
User: slaboure
Date: 02/10/07 10:14:46
Modified:jboss.net Tag: Branch_3_0 build.xml
Log:
Jason, thirdparty structure has been flattened, right? Then we need to flatten
definitions in build.xml files aswell
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.18.2.1 +8 -8 contrib/jboss.net/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/jboss/contrib/jboss.net/build.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.18.2.1
diff -u -r1.18 -r1.18.2.1
--- build.xml 23 Mar 2002 21:11:00 - 1.18
+++ build.xml 7 Oct 2002 17:14:46 - 1.18.2.1
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
!----
!-- == --
-!-- $Id: build.xml,v 1.18 2002/03/23 21:11:00 ejort Exp $ --
+!-- $Id: build.xml,v 1.18.2.1 2002/10/07 17:14:46 slaboure Exp $ --
project default=main name=JBoss/JBoss.Net
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
!-- = --
!-- Java API for XML Processing (JAXP) --
-property name=sun.jaxp.root value=${project.thirdparty}/sun/jaxp/
+property name=sun.jaxp.root value=${project.thirdparty}/sun-jaxp/
property name=sun.jaxp.lib value=${sun.jaxp.root}/lib/
path id=sun.jaxp.classpath
fileset dir=${sun.jaxp.lib}
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
/path
!-- Java Authentication and Authorization API --
-property name=sun.jaas.root value=${project.thirdparty}/sun/jaas/
+property name=sun.jaas.root value=${project.thirdparty}/sun-jaas/
property name=sun.jaas.lib value=${sun.jaas.root}/lib/
path id=sun.jaas.classpath
fileset dir=${sun.jaas.lib}
@@ -88,30 +88,30 @@
/path
!-- Servlets --
-property name=sun.servlet.root value=${project.thirdparty}/sun/servlet/
+property name=sun.servlet.root value=${project.thirdparty}/sun-servlet/
property name=sun.servlet.lib value=${sun.servlet.root}/lib/
path id=sun.servlet.classpath
pathelement path=${sun.servlet.lib}/servlet.jar/
/path
!-- Log4j --
-property name=apache.log4j.root
value=${project.thirdparty}/apache/log4j/
+property name=apache.log4j.root
value=${project.thirdparty}/apache-log4j/
property name=apache.log4j.lib value=${apache.log4j.root}/lib/
path id=apache.log4j.classpath
pathelement path=${apache.log4j.lib}/log4j.jar/
/path
!-- JUnit --
-property name=junit.junit.root value=${project.thirdparty}/junit/junit/
+property name=junit.junit.root value=${project.thirdparty}/junit-junit/
property name=junit.junit.lib value=${junit.junit.root}/lib/
path id=junit.junit.classpath
pathelement path=${junit.junit.lib}/junit.jar/
/path
!-- Axis --
-property name=apache.axis.root value=${project.thirdparty}/apache/axis/
+property name=apache.axis.root value=${project.thirdparty}/apache-axis/
property name=apache.axis.lib value=${apache.axis.root}/lib/
-property name=ibm.wsdl4j.root value=${project.thirdparty}/ibm/wsdl4j/
+property name=ibm.wsdl4j.root value=${project.thirdparty}/ibm-wsdl4j/
property name=ibm.wsdl4j.lib value=${ibm.wsdl4j.root}/lib/
path id=apache.axis.classpath
fileset dir=${apache.axis.lib}
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
jboss-cvs-commits mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-cvs-commits
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed
This has broken the existing 3.0 and 3.2 build structures. Fix these changes immediately as we are not going through the production branch build files to accommodate this change. I also changed the jboss-all alias to checkout its content into the jboss-all directory as this had been changed to jboss. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 8:05 PM Subject: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed Hi... me again ;) I finally got around to fixing, or rather getting around an unfortunate side-effect of the CVS 'update' command. The previous behavior would cause local clients to download the entire thirdparty/* module (which is time and space consuming). CVS is not desgined to handle nested structures very well, so I modified the _project_thirdparty cvs modules to flatten the directory structure. I also had to update the libraries.ent file to use the new root directories for each library. So, what this means to you is that you need to do the following: 1) Re-checkout the project you are working with OR: a) Remove the thirdparty sub-directory b) Check out the _project_thirdparty module. So for the 'jboss-all' project, you would checkout _jboss-all_thirdparty 2) Ensure that your 'tools' module is up to date. That's it. Unix users working on jboss-all (HEAD) you can execute the following from the jboss-all project directory: rm -rf thirdparty cvs get _jboss-all_thirdparty cvs update tools Let me know if you have any questions, comments or problems. Please no flames *whimper*... --jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] jboss-all daily clean failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.3.1_03 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1_03-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.3.1_03-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] Over zealous deployers
The last time I looked at the .ear deployer I thought it was only deploying modules explictly referenced in application.xml and jboss-app.xml, and packages from manifest classpaths. Anything else is a mistake. Lots of people have messed with this code and it keeps breaking. I suggest if you want to put your $0.02 in the most valuable place to start would be with some unit tests so we can find out when someone breaks it again. Fixing it once is easy. Noticing when it is broken again is not. The other deployers usually deploy everything in sight, which is usually correct behavior. thanks david jencks On 2002.10.06 05:43:15 -0400 Matt Goodall wrote: See below ... On Sun, 2002-10-06 at 03:14, Jason Dillon wrote: Hrm... so what is it there for I wonder? If you remove it does deployment still function? When I realised what isDeployable() was for I changed it to unconditionally return false to see what the effect would be. On startup, deployment of some of the .rar and .sar files failed. I think they are fixed by adding the dependent JARs that were automatically deployed to the manifest classpath. EAR files would not deploy since modules are only deployed when the modules file has passed the isDeployable() test. It *does* work when the EAR file is unpacked as a directory though. --jason On 5 Oct 2002, Larry Sanderson wrote: No. I noticed this deplyment behaviour when I was working on the deployable directories, and I wanted to remove it then. As I recall, nobody else really thought it was a problem, and it was left in primarily to deply jar files nested within a sar archive. (Please, correct me if I am wrong here - it was a long time ago) As mentioned above. I think the SARs can be fixed by correcting the manifest classpath. However, I did modify the ear deployer to only deploy those archives mentioned in application.xml. Unless this has been modified since, ear files are not searched for deployable entities (although jar, sar, rar, ... archives are). Hmm ok, I'll take a look at a newer version as I've only really played with 3.0.2 so far. Do you remember what release your change first appeared in? I hope to have a better look this evening. I'll report back with more detailed findings then hopefully. Thanks for the info so far. Cheers, Matt -Larry On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 18:05, Jason Dillon wrote: I am not positive, but I think this might be part of the deployable directories support. --jason On 6 Oct 2002, Matt Goodall wrote: Hi, I'm new (about 1.5 hours altogether) to the JBoss source code so forgive me, and correct me, if I've got some of this wrong ... When I deploy an EAR the deployer deploys that EAR and *all* files contained inside if they are one of the types listed in SubDeployerSupport.isDeployable(). It actually calls isDeployable() for *every* file in the EAR including files like META-INF/MANIFEST.MF and META-INF/application.xml! I've also seen isDeployable() get called for every .class in a JAR. I found this problem on 3.0.2 but it still seems to be there in the latest CVS code. I'm pretty sure this is bug #589808; it's also been discussed in the web forums. I'm not sure why the deployer(s) work like this. Can someone explain it? Is there a good reason for it that I have not seen yet? (Another related issue is that EARDeployer behaves differently depending on whether the EAR is an archive or an unpacked directory.) My understanding is that only modules, i.e. the EAR and the modules listed in application.xml in this case, should be deployed and only dependent JARs listed in the manifest classpath should be loaded at all. I would like to fix this as it's stopping me moving up to 3.x. I think the following is necessary: 1. Look at the other deployers to see what they're doing. 2. Remove isDeployable() and any uses of it. 3. Fix any of the standard SAR/RAR/etc that haven't got a correct manifest classpath. 4. Fix the EARDeployer to deploy just the application.xml modules. I suspect that this change will improve deployment and startup time slightly (no directory scans and string comparisons) but, more importantly, it will make JBoss behave correctly. One of the big problems with fixing this is that it will break applications in 3.x that have not been packaged correctly. For that reason, it may be best to introduce the fix based on some configuration property and leave the current behaviour as default. Any comments before I start on this would be most welcome. Cheers, Matt --- This sf.net email is
Re: [JBoss-dev] Over zealous deployers
There's a sorter in MainDeployer. I strongly recommend using depends elements. david jencks On 2002.10.05 22:33:15 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: Again, I am not positive, but I believe the order is determined by the XML impl, when it returns a NodeList. From what I can tell the order is fairly random. The only way I could get deployments to order correctlt was to use the JBoss depends tag (in jboss.xml in each of the members of the EAR) and depend on the dependent deployed services in the other JAR files. --jason Actually, this brings up a question I've meant to ask for a while - how do you guys determine the order for which modules are deployed when declared in an application.xml file? I had asked a few days ago how to control the order of deployment of ears and wars (currently separate in the deploy dir). But, without changing my deploy scripts in Ant, I wanted to see what the algorithm was (or where the code lives) that determines the order. I was thinking that if the war was defined last in the application.xml, it might get deployed last and thus my cheezy, x-appserver SessionContextListener would fire after all EJBs are deployed (Mbeans are out, as I don't have good mbean support in the jboss foe servers). Thanks, James --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed
All and all I think big structural changes and any big code changes, or any big features should be forbidden from being added to a production branch. IMHO, they shouldn't be allowed for any branched version as a branch means we are trying to stabalize. BTW, you've really hosed me so fix it! Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott M Stark Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 2:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jason Dillon Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed This has broken the existing 3.0 and 3.2 build structures. Fix these changes immediately as we are not going through the production branch build files to accommodate this change. I also changed the jboss-all alias to checkout its content into the jboss-all directory as this had been changed to jboss. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 8:05 PM Subject: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed Hi... me again ;) I finally got around to fixing, or rather getting around an unfortunate side-effect of the CVS 'update' command. The previous behavior would cause local clients to download the entire thirdparty/* module (which is time and space consuming). CVS is not desgined to handle nested structures very well, so I modified the _project_thirdparty cvs modules to flatten the directory structure. I also had to update the libraries.ent file to use the new root directories for each library. So, what this means to you is that you need to do the following: 1) Re-checkout the project you are working with OR: a) Remove the thirdparty sub-directory b) Check out the _project_thirdparty module. So for the 'jboss-all' project, you would checkout _jboss-all_thirdparty 2) Ensure that your 'tools' module is up to date. That's it. Unix users working on jboss-all (HEAD) you can execute the following from the jboss-all project directory: rm -rf thirdparty cvs get _jboss-all_thirdparty cvs update tools Let me know if you have any questions, comments or problems. Please no flames *whimper*... --jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed
This wasn't a code change, it was a change to how jboss is checked out from cvs. I think maybe Jason forgot that there is no branching available in CVSROOT. Basically the problem is that cvs sucks. I think the solution is to have jboss-all-3_0, jboss-all-3_2, and jboss-all-4_0 targets that check out the appropriate structure for each release. We won't change the production targets, newer ones can be subject to improvement. david jencks On 2002.10.07 15:19:40 -0400 Bill Burke wrote: All and all I think big structural changes and any big code changes, or any big features should be forbidden from being added to a production branch. IMHO, they shouldn't be allowed for any branched version as a branch means we are trying to stabalize. BTW, you've really hosed me so fix it! Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott M Stark Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 2:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jason Dillon Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed This has broken the existing 3.0 and 3.2 build structures. Fix these changes immediately as we are not going through the production branch build files to accommodate this change. I also changed the jboss-all alias to checkout its content into the jboss-all directory as this had been changed to jboss. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 8:05 PM Subject: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed Hi... me again ;) I finally got around to fixing, or rather getting around an unfortunate side-effect of the CVS 'update' command. The previous behavior would cause local clients to download the entire thirdparty/* module (which is time and space consuming). CVS is not desgined to handle nested structures very well, so I modified the _project_thirdparty cvs modules to flatten the directory structure. I also had to update the libraries.ent file to use the new root directories for each library. So, what this means to you is that you need to do the following: 1) Re-checkout the project you are working with OR: a) Remove the thirdparty sub-directory b) Check out the _project_thirdparty module. So for the 'jboss-all' project, you would checkout _jboss-all_thirdparty 2) Ensure that your 'tools' module is up to date. That's it. Unix users working on jboss-all (HEAD) you can execute the following from the jboss-all project directory: rm -rf thirdparty cvs get _jboss-all_thirdparty cvs update tools Let me know if you have any questions, comments or problems. Please no flames *whimper*... --jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] jboss-all daily clean failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed
the directory structure and module structure is fucking fine! Why fucking change it! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Jencks Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 4:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed This wasn't a code change, it was a change to how jboss is checked out from cvs. I think maybe Jason forgot that there is no branching available in CVSROOT. Basically the problem is that cvs sucks. I think the solution is to have jboss-all-3_0, jboss-all-3_2, and jboss-all-4_0 targets that check out the appropriate structure for each release. We won't change the production targets, newer ones can be subject to improvement. david jencks On 2002.10.07 15:19:40 -0400 Bill Burke wrote: All and all I think big structural changes and any big code changes, or any big features should be forbidden from being added to a production branch. IMHO, they shouldn't be allowed for any branched version as a branch means we are trying to stabalize. BTW, you've really hosed me so fix it! Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott M Stark Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 2:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jason Dillon Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed This has broken the existing 3.0 and 3.2 build structures. Fix these changes immediately as we are not going through the production branch build files to accommodate this change. I also changed the jboss-all alias to checkout its content into the jboss-all directory as this had been changed to jboss. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 8:05 PM Subject: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed Hi... me again ;) I finally got around to fixing, or rather getting around an unfortunate side-effect of the CVS 'update' command. The previous behavior would cause local clients to download the entire thirdparty/* module (which is time and space consuming). CVS is not desgined to handle nested structures very well, so I modified the _project_thirdparty cvs modules to flatten the directory structure. I also had to update the libraries.ent file to use the new root directories for each library. So, what this means to you is that you need to do the following: 1) Re-checkout the project you are working with OR: a) Remove the thirdparty sub-directory b) Check out the _project_thirdparty module. So for the 'jboss-all' project, you would checkout _jboss-all_thirdparty 2) Ensure that your 'tools' module is up to date. That's it. Unix users working on jboss-all (HEAD) you can execute the following from the jboss-all project directory: rm -rf thirdparty cvs get _jboss-all_thirdparty cvs update tools Let me know if you have any questions, comments or problems. Please no flames *whimper*... --jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed
The nightly build is not very inteligent... --jason On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Sacha Labourey wrote: It is a new undocummented feature. Cool, huh? -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de marc fleury Envoye : lundi, 7 octobre 2002 14:51 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed WTF? marc f -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 8:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed = ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] Somebody forgot to check in sun-jaxp directoriesinto branch_3_0
I had forgot about the branches wrt to thirdparty flattening... for some reason I was convinced that I did not need to change any of the build files for these. I think we need seperate module defs for these, so they can rev independently. --jason On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Bill Burke wrote: BUILD FAILED: Common module ...thirdparty\sun-jaxp\lib not found. Bill --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] Re: [jboss-cvs] contrib/jboss.net build.xml
I know it is not changing... I was not planning on it changing either.
I beleive we need a jboss-3.0 and a jboss-3.2 module which sets up the
correct structure, with out limiting the change for head.
--jason
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Scott M Stark wrote:
Whoa, not this nonsense off. The 3.0 build structure is NOT changing. If
it has its going back!!!
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Sacha Labourey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 10:14 AM
Subject: [jboss-cvs] contrib/jboss.net build.xml
User: slaboure
Date: 02/10/07 10:14:46
Modified:jboss.net Tag: Branch_3_0 build.xml
Log:
Jason, thirdparty structure has been flattened, right? Then we need to flatten
definitions in build.xml files aswell
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.18.2.1 +8 -8 contrib/jboss.net/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/jboss/contrib/jboss.net/build.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.18.2.1
diff -u -r1.18 -r1.18.2.1
--- build.xml 23 Mar 2002 21:11:00 - 1.18
+++ build.xml 7 Oct 2002 17:14:46 - 1.18.2.1
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
!----
!-- == --
-!-- $Id: build.xml,v 1.18 2002/03/23 21:11:00 ejort Exp $ --
+!-- $Id: build.xml,v 1.18.2.1 2002/10/07 17:14:46 slaboure Exp $ --
project default=main name=JBoss/JBoss.Net
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
!-- = --
!-- Java API for XML Processing (JAXP) --
-property name=sun.jaxp.root value=${project.thirdparty}/sun/jaxp/
+property name=sun.jaxp.root value=${project.thirdparty}/sun-jaxp/
property name=sun.jaxp.lib value=${sun.jaxp.root}/lib/
path id=sun.jaxp.classpath
fileset dir=${sun.jaxp.lib}
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
/path
!-- Java Authentication and Authorization API --
-property name=sun.jaas.root value=${project.thirdparty}/sun/jaas/
+property name=sun.jaas.root value=${project.thirdparty}/sun-jaas/
property name=sun.jaas.lib value=${sun.jaas.root}/lib/
path id=sun.jaas.classpath
fileset dir=${sun.jaas.lib}
@@ -88,30 +88,30 @@
/path
!-- Servlets --
-property name=sun.servlet.root
value=${project.thirdparty}/sun/servlet/
+property name=sun.servlet.root
value=${project.thirdparty}/sun-servlet/
property name=sun.servlet.lib value=${sun.servlet.root}/lib/
path id=sun.servlet.classpath
pathelement path=${sun.servlet.lib}/servlet.jar/
/path
!-- Log4j --
-property name=apache.log4j.root
value=${project.thirdparty}/apache/log4j/
+property name=apache.log4j.root
value=${project.thirdparty}/apache-log4j/
property name=apache.log4j.lib value=${apache.log4j.root}/lib/
path id=apache.log4j.classpath
pathelement path=${apache.log4j.lib}/log4j.jar/
/path
!-- JUnit --
-property name=junit.junit.root
value=${project.thirdparty}/junit/junit/
+property name=junit.junit.root
value=${project.thirdparty}/junit-junit/
property name=junit.junit.lib value=${junit.junit.root}/lib/
path id=junit.junit.classpath
pathelement path=${junit.junit.lib}/junit.jar/
/path
!-- Axis --
-property name=apache.axis.root
value=${project.thirdparty}/apache/axis/
+property name=apache.axis.root
value=${project.thirdparty}/apache-axis/
property name=apache.axis.lib value=${apache.axis.root}/lib/
-property name=ibm.wsdl4j.root value=${project.thirdparty}/ibm/wsdl4j/
+property name=ibm.wsdl4j.root value=${project.thirdparty}/ibm-wsdl4j/
property name=ibm.wsdl4j.lib value=${ibm.wsdl4j.root}/lib/
path id=apache.axis.classpath
fileset dir=${apache.axis.lib}
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
jboss-cvs-commits mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-cvs-commits
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
jboss-cvs-commits mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed
This has broken the existing 3.0 and 3.2 build structures. Fix these changes immediately as we are not going through the production branch build files to accommodate this change. I will do. Like I said before I did not believe it would affect the 3.x builds... but I should have not made that assumption. My appologies. I also changed the jboss-all alias to checkout its content into the jboss-all directory as this had been changed to jboss. Yeah, I was hoping to start tranisition away to the target namespace... but it appears that some people are less adaptable than others. --jason Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 8:05 PM Subject: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed Hi... me again ;) I finally got around to fixing, or rather getting around an unfortunate side-effect of the CVS 'update' command. The previous behavior would cause local clients to download the entire thirdparty/* module (which is time and space consuming). CVS is not desgined to handle nested structures very well, so I modified the _project_thirdparty cvs modules to flatten the directory structure. I also had to update the libraries.ent file to use the new root directories for each library. So, what this means to you is that you need to do the following: 1) Re-checkout the project you are working with OR: a) Remove the thirdparty sub-directory b) Check out the _project_thirdparty module. So for the 'jboss-all' project, you would checkout _jboss-all_thirdparty 2) Ensure that your 'tools' module is up to date. That's it. Unix users working on jboss-all (HEAD) you can execute the following from the jboss-all project directory: rm -rf thirdparty cvs get _jboss-all_thirdparty cvs update tools Let me know if you have any questions, comments or problems. Please no flames *whimper*... --jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed
If you READ me email you would understand that the module structure has not changed, only the thirparty directory has. People bitch left and right that cvs update downloads stuff which is not needed. All I did was fix the problem. TRUE I did forget about the production branch... I am human and make mistakes. So chill dude. --jason On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Bill Burke wrote: the directory structure and module structure is fucking fine! Why fucking change it! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Jencks Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 4:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed This wasn't a code change, it was a change to how jboss is checked out from cvs. I think maybe Jason forgot that there is no branching available in CVSROOT. Basically the problem is that cvs sucks. I think the solution is to have jboss-all-3_0, jboss-all-3_2, and jboss-all-4_0 targets that check out the appropriate structure for each release. We won't change the production targets, newer ones can be subject to improvement. david jencks On 2002.10.07 15:19:40 -0400 Bill Burke wrote: All and all I think big structural changes and any big code changes, or any big features should be forbidden from being added to a production branch. IMHO, they shouldn't be allowed for any branched version as a branch means we are trying to stabalize. BTW, you've really hosed me so fix it! Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott M Stark Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 2:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jason Dillon Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed This has broken the existing 3.0 and 3.2 build structures. Fix these changes immediately as we are not going through the production branch build files to accommodate this change. I also changed the jboss-all alias to checkout its content into the jboss-all directory as this had been changed to jboss. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 8:05 PM Subject: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed Hi... me again ;) I finally got around to fixing, or rather getting around an unfortunate side-effect of the CVS 'update' command. The previous behavior would cause local clients to download the entire thirdparty/* module (which is time and space consuming). CVS is not desgined to handle nested structures very well, so I modified the _project_thirdparty cvs modules to flatten the directory structure. I also had to update the libraries.ent file to use the new root directories for each library. So, what this means to you is that you need to do the following: 1) Re-checkout the project you are working with OR: a) Remove the thirdparty sub-directory b) Check out the _project_thirdparty module. So for the 'jboss-all' project, you would checkout _jboss-all_thirdparty 2) Ensure that your 'tools' module is up to date. That's it. Unix users working on jboss-all (HEAD) you can execute the following from the jboss-all project directory: rm -rf thirdparty cvs get _jboss-all_thirdparty cvs update tools Let me know if you have any questions, comments or problems. Please no flames *whimper*... --jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is
Re: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed
CVS can't handle thirdparty only including some of the subdirectories. On checkout you get one set of stuff, if you update you get much more. Jason was trying to make the set of stuff you get from checkout and update the same. I think its really important to ensure this, whether or not Jason's fix is the best possible. I think fixing it (at least in head) is more important than keeping the directory structure the same. If you have a way to fix the problem while keeping the structure the same, I think that would be better. I don't have such a way. thanks david jencks On 2002.10.07 16:28:09 -0400 Bill Burke wrote: the directory structure and module structure is fucking fine! Why fucking change it! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Jencks Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 4:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed This wasn't a code change, it was a change to how jboss is checked out from cvs. I think maybe Jason forgot that there is no branching available in CVSROOT. Basically the problem is that cvs sucks. I think the solution is to have jboss-all-3_0, jboss-all-3_2, and jboss-all-4_0 targets that check out the appropriate structure for each release. We won't change the production targets, newer ones can be subject to improvement. david jencks On 2002.10.07 15:19:40 -0400 Bill Burke wrote: All and all I think big structural changes and any big code changes, or any big features should be forbidden from being added to a production branch. IMHO, they shouldn't be allowed for any branched version as a branch means we are trying to stabalize. BTW, you've really hosed me so fix it! Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott M Stark Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 2:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jason Dillon Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed This has broken the existing 3.0 and 3.2 build structures. Fix these changes immediately as we are not going through the production branch build files to accommodate this change. I also changed the jboss-all alias to checkout its content into the jboss-all directory as this had been changed to jboss. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 8:05 PM Subject: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed Hi... me again ;) I finally got around to fixing, or rather getting around an unfortunate side-effect of the CVS 'update' command. The previous behavior would cause local clients to download the entire thirdparty/* module (which is time and space consuming). CVS is not desgined to handle nested structures very well, so I modified the _project_thirdparty cvs modules to flatten the directory structure. I also had to update the libraries.ent file to use the new root directories for each library. So, what this means to you is that you need to do the following: 1) Re-checkout the project you are working with OR: a) Remove the thirdparty sub-directory b) Check out the _project_thirdparty module. So for the 'jboss-all' project, you would checkout _jboss-all_thirdparty 2) Ensure that your 'tools' module is up to date. That's it. Unix users working on jboss-all (HEAD) you can execute the following from the jboss-all project directory: rm -rf thirdparty cvs get _jboss-all_thirdparty cvs update tools Let me know if you have any questions, comments or problems. Please no flames *whimper*... --jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf
RE: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed
Does anyone know where the scripts for these tests are kept? --jason On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, marc fleury wrote: But seriously now, can anyone get Chris on the line, he needs to clean the disk and checkout... this is embarassing marc f -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lennart Petersson Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 9:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed It's the ultimate solution of the build mess - simplify you know :) /Lennart måndagen den 7 oktober 2002 kl 14.55 skrev Sacha Labourey: It is a new undocummented feature. Cool, huh? -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de marc fleury Envoye : lundi, 7 octobre 2002 14:51 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed WTF? marc f -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 8:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed = ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: build.sh: No such file or directory --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] HEAD Build: numerous failure
What errors do you get specifically Sacha? --jason On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Sacha Labourey wrote: Hello, Is it just me? I am trying to compile jboss-all from HEAD (I did a fresh checkout a few minutes ago) on windows 2000 and I get lots of errors which change over time i.e the compiler (1.4.0) makes an exception and, if I start again the build process, it goes further, ... then it is an RMI compiler errror (couldn't read LOC header), then it is a set of silent break, etc. At the end (after 4-5 restart, it is build successfuly) Cheers, Sacha --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed
I do not believe it is possible due to the manner in which CVS works. Sorry for the chaos... I will resolve these issues w/o breaking anything. *sigh* --jason On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, David Jencks wrote: CVS can't handle thirdparty only including some of the subdirectories. On checkout you get one set of stuff, if you update you get much more. Jason was trying to make the set of stuff you get from checkout and update the same. I think its really important to ensure this, whether or not Jason's fix is the best possible. I think fixing it (at least in head) is more important than keeping the directory structure the same. If you have a way to fix the problem while keeping the structure the same, I think that would be better. I don't have such a way. thanks david jencks On 2002.10.07 16:28:09 -0400 Bill Burke wrote: the directory structure and module structure is fucking fine! Why fucking change it! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Jencks Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 4:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed This wasn't a code change, it was a change to how jboss is checked out from cvs. I think maybe Jason forgot that there is no branching available in CVSROOT. Basically the problem is that cvs sucks. I think the solution is to have jboss-all-3_0, jboss-all-3_2, and jboss-all-4_0 targets that check out the appropriate structure for each release. We won't change the production targets, newer ones can be subject to improvement. david jencks On 2002.10.07 15:19:40 -0400 Bill Burke wrote: All and all I think big structural changes and any big code changes, or any big features should be forbidden from being added to a production branch. IMHO, they shouldn't be allowed for any branched version as a branch means we are trying to stabalize. BTW, you've really hosed me so fix it! Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott M Stark Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 2:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jason Dillon Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed This has broken the existing 3.0 and 3.2 build structures. Fix these changes immediately as we are not going through the production branch build files to accommodate this change. I also changed the jboss-all alias to checkout its content into the jboss-all directory as this had been changed to jboss. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 8:05 PM Subject: [JBoss-dev] README :: Thirdparty structure changed Hi... me again ;) I finally got around to fixing, or rather getting around an unfortunate side-effect of the CVS 'update' command. The previous behavior would cause local clients to download the entire thirdparty/* module (which is time and space consuming). CVS is not desgined to handle nested structures very well, so I modified the _project_thirdparty cvs modules to flatten the directory structure. I also had to update the libraries.ent file to use the new root directories for each library. So, what this means to you is that you need to do the following: 1) Re-checkout the project you are working with OR: a) Remove the thirdparty sub-directory b) Check out the _project_thirdparty module. So for the 'jboss-all' project, you would checkout _jboss-all_thirdparty 2) Ensure that your 'tools' module is up to date. That's it. Unix users working on jboss-all (HEAD) you can execute the following from the jboss-all project directory: rm -rf thirdparty cvs get _jboss-all_thirdparty cvs update tools Let me know if you have any questions, comments or problems. Please no flames *whimper*... --jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven.
[JBoss-dev] jboss-all daily clean failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.3.1_03 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1_03-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.3.1_03-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: Executing: /home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/tools/bin/ant -logger org.apache.tools.ant.NoBannerLogger clean Buildfile: build.xml _buildmagic:init: Trying to override old definition of task property BUILD FAILED file:/disk/orig/home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/build/../tools/etc/buildfragments/tools.ent:29: taskdef class xdoclet.modules.jmx.JMXDocletTask cannot be found Total time: 6 seconds --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-614116 ] Oracle XA pooling/repeated rollback
Bugs item #614116, was opened at 2002-09-24 17:56
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=614116group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Elias Ross (genman)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Oracle XA pooling/repeated rollback
Initial Comment:
I've been trying to isolate some problems I've been
having with transaction roll-backs and message-driven
beans. Basically, when a transaction is rolled-back
a number of times in the onMessage() body
(by calling MessageDrivenContext.setRollbackOnly()
5-10 times in succession),
the message is re-delivered to the MDB, but the Oracle
Connection is no longer in a good state.
This problem manifests itself when using a very small
connection pool (say 1-5) connections.
Example code snippet:
public void onMessage(javax.jms.Message jmsMessage)
{
Connection c = null;
try {
TextMessage tm = (TextMessage)jmsMessage;
String text = tm.getText();
c = ds.getConnection();
PreparedStatement s = c.prepareStatement(insert into test values (?));
s.setString(1, text);
s.executeUpdate();
mdc.setRollbackOnly();
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new EJBException(e);
} finally {
if (c != null) {
try { c.close(); }
catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
First I see it works for a few times. It rolls-back successfully
about 5 or 6 times. Then, for no reason, I see:
15:50:44,922 WARN [TxCapsule] XAException: tx=XidImpl [FormatId=257,
GlobalId=eross.m-qube.com//4,
BranchQual=] errorCode=XAER_RMERR
javax.transaction.xa.XAException
at oracle.jdbc.xa.OracleXAResource.allowGlobalTxnModeOnly(OracleXAResource.java:1069)
at oracle.jdbc.xa.OracleXAResource.suspendStacked(OracleXAResource.java:296)
at oracle.jdbc.xa.client.OracleXAResource.end(OracleXAResource.java:381)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.endResource(TxCapsule.java:1237)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.delistResource(TxCapsule.java:579)
at org.jboss.tm.TransactionImpl.delistResource(TransactionImpl.java:92)
at
org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.XATxConnectionManager$XAConnectionEventListener.delist(XATxConnectionManager.java:284)
at
org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.XATxConnectionManager$XAConnectionEventListener.connectionClosed(XATxConnectionManager.java:331)
at
org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.BaseManagedConnection.fireConnectionEvent(BaseManagedConnection.java:152)
at
org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.xa.XAManagedConnection.fireConnectionEvent(XAManagedConnection.java:215)
at
org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.xa.XAManagedConnection$1.connectionClosed(XAManagedConnection.java:127)
at
oracle.jdbc.pool.OraclePooledConnection.callListener(OraclePooledConnection.java:482)
at
oracle.jdbc.pool.OraclePooledConnection.logicalClose(OraclePooledConnection.java:445)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleConnection.logicalClose(OracleConnection.java:2900)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleConnection.close(OracleConnection.java:1418)
at com.proteusmobile.smx.AMDB.onMessage(AMDB.java:140)
Later:
15:50:44,929 WARN [TxCapsule] XAException: tx=XidImpl [FormatId=257,
GlobalId=eross.m-qube.com//4,
BranchQual=] errorCode=XAER_RMERR
javax.transaction.xa.XAException
at oracle.jdbc.xa.OracleXAResource.allowGlobalTxnModeOnly(OracleXAResource.java:1069)
at oracle.jdbc.xa.OracleXAResource.suspendStacked(OracleXAResource.java:296)
at oracle.jdbc.xa.client.OracleXAResource.end(OracleXAResource.java:381)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.endResource(TxCapsule.java:1237)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.endResources(TxCapsule.java:1312)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.rollback(TxCapsule.java:440)
at org.jboss.tm.TransactionImpl.rollback(TransactionImpl.java:83)
at org.jboss.jms.asf.StdServerSession.onMessage(StdServerSession.java:301)
at
org.jboss.mq.SpyMessageConsumer.sessionConsumerProcessMessage(SpyMessageConsumer.java:603)
at org.jboss.mq.SpyMessageConsumer.addMessage(SpyMessageConsumer.java:417)
at org.jboss.mq.SpySession.run(SpySession.java:259)
at org.jboss.jms.asf.StdServerSession.run(StdServerSession.java:177)
at EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent.PooledExecutor$Worker.run(PooledExecutor.java:655)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479)
And then, I can no longer get a connection:
15:50:44,971 WARN [TxCapsule] XAException: tx=XidImpl [FormatId=257,
GlobalId=eross.m-qube.com//5,
BranchQual=] errorCode=XAER_PROTO
javax.transaction.xa.XAException
at oracle.jdbc.xa.OracleXAResource.disallowLocalTxnMode(OracleXAResource.java:1045)
at oracle.jdbc.xa.client.OracleXAResource.start(OracleXAResource.java:153)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.startResource(TxCapsule.java:1180)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.enlistResource(TxCapsule.java:679)
at org.jboss.tm.TransactionImpl.enlistResource(TransactionImpl.java:102)
at
org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.XATxConnectionManager$XAConnectionEventListener.enlist(XATxConnectionManager.java:262)
at
[JBoss-dev] RE: [jboss-group] jmx/src/resources/test/log4j is hosed
How about providing some more information so others can try to help the situation a? --jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Burke Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 2:58 PM To: Jboss-Dev Cc: Jboss-Group@Jboss. Org Subject: [jboss-group] jmx/src/resources/test/log4j is hosed I hang when get latest at this directory. What is going on I can't do work Bill ___ jboss-group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://secure.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-group --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] RE: RMIAdaptorService still won't compile
Branch_3_0 BTW. Come on! Fix this shit! -Original Message- From: Bill Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 5:42 PM To: Jboss-Group@Jboss. Org Cc: Jboss-Dev Subject: RMIAdaptorService still won't compile line 39: should be declared abstract; it does not define getJndiName() line 76: cannot resolve symbol OBJECT_NAME Bill --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-614116 ] Oracle XA pooling/repeated rollback
Bugs item #614116, was opened at 2002-09-24 19:56
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=614116group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Elias Ross (genman)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Oracle XA pooling/repeated rollback
Initial Comment:
I've been trying to isolate some problems I've been
having with transaction roll-backs and message-driven
beans. Basically, when a transaction is rolled-back
a number of times in the onMessage() body
(by calling MessageDrivenContext.setRollbackOnly()
5-10 times in succession),
the message is re-delivered to the MDB, but the Oracle
Connection is no longer in a good state.
This problem manifests itself when using a very small
connection pool (say 1-5) connections.
Example code snippet:
public void onMessage(javax.jms.Message jmsMessage)
{
Connection c = null;
try {
TextMessage tm = (TextMessage)jmsMessage;
String text = tm.getText();
c = ds.getConnection();
PreparedStatement s = c.prepareStatement(insert into test values (?));
s.setString(1, text);
s.executeUpdate();
mdc.setRollbackOnly();
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new EJBException(e);
} finally {
if (c != null) {
try { c.close(); }
catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
First I see it works for a few times. It rolls-back successfully
about 5 or 6 times. Then, for no reason, I see:
15:50:44,922 WARN [TxCapsule] XAException: tx=XidImpl [FormatId=257,
GlobalId=eross.m-qube.com//4,
BranchQual=] errorCode=XAER_RMERR
javax.transaction.xa.XAException
at oracle.jdbc.xa.OracleXAResource.allowGlobalTxnModeOnly(OracleXAResource.java:1069)
at oracle.jdbc.xa.OracleXAResource.suspendStacked(OracleXAResource.java:296)
at oracle.jdbc.xa.client.OracleXAResource.end(OracleXAResource.java:381)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.endResource(TxCapsule.java:1237)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.delistResource(TxCapsule.java:579)
at org.jboss.tm.TransactionImpl.delistResource(TransactionImpl.java:92)
at
org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.XATxConnectionManager$XAConnectionEventListener.delist(XATxConnectionManager.java:284)
at
org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.XATxConnectionManager$XAConnectionEventListener.connectionClosed(XATxConnectionManager.java:331)
at
org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.BaseManagedConnection.fireConnectionEvent(BaseManagedConnection.java:152)
at
org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.xa.XAManagedConnection.fireConnectionEvent(XAManagedConnection.java:215)
at
org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.xa.XAManagedConnection$1.connectionClosed(XAManagedConnection.java:127)
at
oracle.jdbc.pool.OraclePooledConnection.callListener(OraclePooledConnection.java:482)
at
oracle.jdbc.pool.OraclePooledConnection.logicalClose(OraclePooledConnection.java:445)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleConnection.logicalClose(OracleConnection.java:2900)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleConnection.close(OracleConnection.java:1418)
at com.proteusmobile.smx.AMDB.onMessage(AMDB.java:140)
Later:
15:50:44,929 WARN [TxCapsule] XAException: tx=XidImpl [FormatId=257,
GlobalId=eross.m-qube.com//4,
BranchQual=] errorCode=XAER_RMERR
javax.transaction.xa.XAException
at oracle.jdbc.xa.OracleXAResource.allowGlobalTxnModeOnly(OracleXAResource.java:1069)
at oracle.jdbc.xa.OracleXAResource.suspendStacked(OracleXAResource.java:296)
at oracle.jdbc.xa.client.OracleXAResource.end(OracleXAResource.java:381)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.endResource(TxCapsule.java:1237)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.endResources(TxCapsule.java:1312)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.rollback(TxCapsule.java:440)
at org.jboss.tm.TransactionImpl.rollback(TransactionImpl.java:83)
at org.jboss.jms.asf.StdServerSession.onMessage(StdServerSession.java:301)
at
org.jboss.mq.SpyMessageConsumer.sessionConsumerProcessMessage(SpyMessageConsumer.java:603)
at org.jboss.mq.SpyMessageConsumer.addMessage(SpyMessageConsumer.java:417)
at org.jboss.mq.SpySession.run(SpySession.java:259)
at org.jboss.jms.asf.StdServerSession.run(StdServerSession.java:177)
at EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent.PooledExecutor$Worker.run(PooledExecutor.java:655)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479)
And then, I can no longer get a connection:
15:50:44,971 WARN [TxCapsule] XAException: tx=XidImpl [FormatId=257,
GlobalId=eross.m-qube.com//5,
BranchQual=] errorCode=XAER_PROTO
javax.transaction.xa.XAException
at oracle.jdbc.xa.OracleXAResource.disallowLocalTxnMode(OracleXAResource.java:1045)
at oracle.jdbc.xa.client.OracleXAResource.start(OracleXAResource.java:153)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.startResource(TxCapsule.java:1180)
at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.enlistResource(TxCapsule.java:679)
at org.jboss.tm.TransactionImpl.enlistResource(TransactionImpl.java:102)
at
org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.XATxConnectionManager$XAConnectionEventListener.enlist(XATxConnectionManager.java:262)
at
[JBoss-dev] RMIAdaptorService still won't compile
line 39: should be declared abstract; it does not define getJndiName() line 76: cannot resolve symbol OBJECT_NAME Bill --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] jboss-all daily clean failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: Executing: /home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/tools/bin/ant -logger org.apache.tools.ant.NoBannerLogger clean Buildfile: build.xml _buildmagic:init: Trying to override old definition of task property BUILD FAILED file:/disk/orig/home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/build/../tools/etc/buildfragments/tools.ent:29: taskdef class xdoclet.modules.jmx.JMXDocletTask cannot be found Total time: 8 seconds --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-619969 ] SQL Server substring syntax is wrong
Bugs item #619969, was opened at 2002-10-07 17:15 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=619969group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Vinh Nguyen (softwaremasters) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SQL Server substring syntax is wrong Initial Comment: The function mapping for substring for SQL Server (both 7 and 2K) in standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml is currently: substring(?1 FROM ?2 FOR ?3) This is incorrect. The correct syntax for the substring function is: substring(?1, ?2, ?3) -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=619969group_id=22866 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: Executing: /home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/tools/bin/ant -logger org.apache.tools.ant.NoBannerLogger -Dinstall.id=testbuild release Buildfile: build.xml _buildmagic:init: Trying to override old definition of task property BUILD FAILED file:/disk/orig/home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/build/../tools/etc/buildfragments/tools.ent:29: taskdef class xdoclet.modules.jmx.JMXDocletTask cannot be found Total time: 6 seconds --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] jmx/src/resources/test/log4j is hosed
I hang when get latest at this directory. What is going on I can't do work Bill --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: [jboss-group] jmx/src/resources/test/log4j is hosed
try there is no other information CVS hangs for me. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason Dillon Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 6:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Jboss-Dev' Cc: 'Jboss-Group@Jboss. Org' Subject: [JBoss-dev] RE: [jboss-group] jmx/src/resources/test/log4j is hosed How about providing some more information so others can try to help the situation a? --jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Burke Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 2:58 PM To: Jboss-Dev Cc: Jboss-Group@Jboss. Org Subject: [jboss-group] jmx/src/resources/test/log4j is hosed I hang when get latest at this directory. What is going on I can't do work Bill ___ jboss-group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://secure.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-group --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] jmx/src/resources/test/log4j is hosed
What is the CVS command you are using, so I can try to reproduce. --jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Burke Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 2:58 PM To: Jboss-Dev Cc: Jboss-Group@Jboss. Org Subject: [JBoss-dev] jmx/src/resources/test/log4j is hosed I hang when get latest at this directory. What is going on I can't do work Bill --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: [jboss-group] jmx/src/resources/test/log4j is hosed
Oh... well that is quite a different problem... which is out of my control. Does it hang every time? Are you having any connectivity problems to sf.net? --jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Burke Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 3:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: [jboss-group] jmx/src/resources/test/log4j is hosed try there is no other information CVS hangs for me. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason Dillon Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 6:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Jboss-Dev' Cc: 'Jboss-Group@Jboss. Org' Subject: [JBoss-dev] RE: [jboss-group] jmx/src/resources/test/log4j is hosed How about providing some more information so others can try to help the situation a? --jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Burke Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 2:58 PM To: Jboss-Dev Cc: Jboss-Group@Jboss. Org Subject: [jboss-group] jmx/src/resources/test/log4j is hosed I hang when get latest at this directory. What is going on I can't do work Bill ___ jboss-group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://secure.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-group --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] jboss-all daily clean failed
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.3.1_03 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1_03-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.3.1_03-b03, mixed mode) = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE build.sh: Executing: /home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/tools/bin/ant -logger org.apache.tools.ant.NoBannerLogger clean Buildfile: build.xml _buildmagic:init: Trying to override old definition of task property BUILD FAILED file:/disk/orig/home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/build/../tools/etc/buildfragments/tools.ent:29: taskdef class xdoclet.modules.jmx.JMXDocletTask cannot be found Total time: 6 seconds --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] Fixing module defintions now for head, 3.0 3.2
I have to modify CVSROOT/modules to test, so please be patient if something does not function. I will make sure that all jboss-* projects function by the days end. --jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] README :: JBoss Projects Build System
I have just verified that all of the branches for the currently active JBoss versions build correctly out of the box. I did however need to make some modifications to the CVSROOT/modules file to make this work correctly and to help prevent future fuckups (probably by me) when changing the structure of a project (which should not other branches a project). To make use of this I have setup 3 new project definitions in CVSROOT/modules: jboss-3.0 - The JBoss 3.0.x project structure definition jboss-3.2 - The JBoss 3.2.x '' jboss-2.4 - The JBoss 2.4.x '' Unfortunately CVS does not allow branch tags (or any tags) to be specified in the module definition, so you must still specific '-r branch' on the command line. The above simply specifies the correct structure for the project. For example, to check out the latest JBoss 3.0.x you would: cvs get -r Branch_3_0 jboss-3.0 For JBoss 3.2 you would: cvs get -r Branch_3_2 jboss-3.2 Keep in mind that you should use the correct project definition even when checking out non-branch tags as well. 'jboss-all' is still the HEAD branch. I think that we should eventually change this name to 'jboss' or 'jboss-head', since it does not really contain 'all' of the modules anymore. But this can wait until later. I am currently working on making the JBoss 2.4 project independent of other structure changes, but I have not completed it yet. The current branch will build as it did before; I have changed nothing that would affect that. * * * I am really sorry about the mess I created last night. I don't know why, but I had convinced myself that the other branches would work fine. Before I stopped for the evening I thought about that issue for a bit and decided things were okay. Anyways, I am really sorry for the trouble. I hope to avoid such messes in the future. Your humble build system slave (AKA. That guy who always breaks things), --jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 7-October-2002
Number of tests run: 942
Successful tests: 938
Errors:2
Failures: 2
[time of test: 7 October 2002 15:33 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
[java.vm.version: 1.3.1_03-69]
[java.vm.name: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM]
[java.vm.info: mixed mode]
[os.name: Mac OS X]
[os.arch: ppc]
[os.version: 10.2.1]
See http://lubega.com/testarchive/${build.uid} for details of this test.
See http://lubega.com for general test information.
NOTE: If there are any errors shown above - this mail is only highlighting
them - it is NOT indicating that they are being looked at by anyone.
Remember - if a test becomes broken after your changes - fix it or fix the test!
Oh dear - still got some errors!
Thanks for all your effort - we really do love you!
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss3.2-Tomcat4.1.10
If you look at the Embedded usage in the JBoss service it is not doing much. Being able to run off a sar with the minimum elements from tomcat would be good, but I want to keep the ability to run with a pristine tomcat dist. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:19 AM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss3.2-Tomcat4.1.10 Liam Magee wrote: Hi Thomas, I haven't looked deeply into Tomcat MBean support, this is the next natural step for integration b/w JBoss and Tomcat. I think it would be beneficial to stop using Embedded eventually (whatever JBoss needs to do should be doable using a host configurator and similar hooks), so that little or no code duplication is needed. I'll make changes on the Tomcat side (either in future 4.1.x releases, or in Tomcat 5.0.x) and the JBoss/Tomcat build script to allow customizing the classloader and directory structure if people are interested in getting an integration with a neater packaging ala Jetty/JBoss (many components and libraries are also not useful to JBoss and could be removed, thus making the download archive much smaller). Remy --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
