it is late in the night 2:50am, but i have the idea: why not embedded jboss?
-- ejboss --
ok, going fishing some sleep...
bax
> JBossME is maybe not the best project name ? ME being Micro Edition
> Maybe JBossEE (Embedded Edition) ? or EMBOSS ?
>
> The project should look into investing in DAS
Hey Bill,
> 1. What have you worked on in the past?
JMS bug fixes
> 2. What are you currently working on?
> 3. What will you be working on and when?
Nothing at the moment. We're doing a lot with JMS at my company, so I've
been fixing bugs as I find them.
> 4. What do you want to work on?
I wou
Bugs item #653047, was opened at 2002-12-13 00:34
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=653047&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sebastian Hauer (hauer)
Assigned
Bugs item #653047, was opened at 2002-12-13 01:34
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=653047&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sebastian Hauer (hauer)
Assigned
On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 01:33 PM, Holger Baxmann wrote:
I would define a powerful PDA as any PDA with enough power to run the
current version of WindowCE (handheld version). What I mean are the
IPaq and Zauras, both of which are currently 200 MHz 64 Meg on the low
end currently and t
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1001
Successful tests: 992
Errors:8
Failures: 1
[time of test: 2002-12-12.12-07 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
Bugs item #554535, was opened at 2002-05-10 04:14
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=554535&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Niall O'Sullivan (nosullivan)
Ass
> JBossME is maybe not the best project name ? ME being Micro Edition
> Maybe JBossEE (Embedded Edition) ? or EMBOSS ?
>
emboss was being mentioned by marc back in april. but it is an dna
sequencing software name too.
> The project should look into investing in DASH-O Pro to compress the
> binar
> torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 18.54 skrev Holger Baxmann:
>
>> according to the laws - yes, murphys too - the cpu/mem/bandwith problem
>> doesn't influence the progress of things: it is envolving independend.
>> what i am talking about is that a jboss-client should run on any
>> halfway
>> i
> On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 12:02 PM, Holger Baxmann wrote:
>
>> btw: what means 'powerfull'? i have a fpga device here (call it sbc)
>> which
>> is able to generate a throughput of 1..2.8 Gbits/sec with rijndael
>> block
>> cipher. is this powerfull?
>
> I would define a powerful PDA as
JBossME is maybe not the best project name ? ME being Micro Edition
Maybe JBossEE (Embedded Edition) ? or EMBOSS ?
The project should look into investing in DASH-O Pro to compress the
binary deliverables ?
Then maybe the project could have three reference devices in a range
from phone to sbc ?
Hi,
I've been having trouble deploying one of my EJBs as a web service on
jboss-head, so I went back and tried the example from:
http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/~bscharla/teaching/mtp_software/jboss/jboss-ne
t-EJB-example.shtml
I get the same error for both my ejb/webservice and the hello example
when
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 18.54 skrev Holger Baxmann:
according to the laws - yes, murphys too - the cpu/mem/bandwith problem
doesn't influence the progress of things: it is envolving independend.
what i am talking about is that a jboss-client should run on any
halfway
intelligent devic
On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 12:02 PM, Holger Baxmann wrote:
btw: what means 'powerfull'? i have a fpga device here (call it sbc)
which
is able to generate a throughput of 1..2.8 Gbits/sec with rijndael
block
cipher. is this powerfull?
I would define a powerful PDA as any PDA with enoug
> torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 17.28 skrev Dain Sundstrom:
>
>> I personally only want one build for the powerful handhelds.
>
> oki - so We have embedded devices in a range of
> - Phones
> - PDA's
> - SBC (Single Board Computers)
i do not know the structure of this bullet list is, what the
> torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 16.01 skrev Holger Baxmann:
>
>> embedded systems constits normally of many - some 1...k - devices,
>> clustering comes to my mind ...
>
> Yes - but lets try break embedded down some, to devise's that use a
> "Mobile Phone Wire" and device's using a "SBC (Singl
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 17.28 skrev Dain Sundstrom:
I personally only want one build for the powerful handhelds.
oki - so We have embedded devices in a range of
- Phones
- PDA's
- SBC (Single Board Computers)
If anyone wants to make the other ones, that would be cool.
yes it woul
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 16.01 skrev Holger Baxmann:
embedded systems constits normally of many - some 1...k - devices,
clustering comes to my mind ...
Yes - but lets try break embedded down some, to devise's that use a
"Mobile Phone Wire" and device's using a "SBC (SingleBoardComput
Hi all!
JBoss has become a huge success and has reached the milestone of over 2
million downloads. Unfortunately though, because we're open-source and
free, we rarely get any testamonials on JBoss success stories. Please help
us spread the word! Enter your testamonial at the forum below.
In-pro
Hi all!
JBoss has become a huge success and has reached the milestone of over 2
million downloads. Unfortunately though, because we're open-source and
free, we rarely get any testamonials on JBoss success stories. Please help
us spread the word! Enter your testamonial at the forum below.
In-pro
Bugs item #650929, was opened at 2002-12-09 16:54
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=650929&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: James Strachan (strachancambs
Bugs item #629145, was opened at 2002-10-26 19:14
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=629145&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stefan Wachter (stefanwachter)
Assigned to: Chri
I personally only want one build for the powerful handhelds. If anyone
wants to make the other ones, that would be cool.
-dain
On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 08:53 AM, Peter Fagerlund wrote:
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 00.41 skrev Holger Baxmann:
btw: who is talking about jboss-cl
Bugs item #652743, was opened at 2002-12-12 17:06
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=652743&group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Heiko W.Rupp (pilhuhn)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anony
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> 1. What have you worked on in the past?
Various bug fixes: worked with Dain on some of the read-ahead performance
issues; worked with David to get the EAR deploying *-ds.xml and
*-service.xml files; etc...
> 2. What a
Bugs item #652717, was opened at 2002-12-12 16:10
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=652717&group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Halil-C. Gürsoy (che---)
Assig
Bugs item #652717, was opened at 2002-12-12 16:10
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=652717&group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Halil-C. Gürsoy (che---)
Assig
> torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 00.41 skrev Holger Baxmann:
>
>> btw: who is talking about jboss-client? i will have clustering across a
>> whole fabrication line, a whole plant over highspeed i/o ports or
>> similar
>> ieee implementations.
>> Utility Communications Architecture (UCA)
>> Gene
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 00.41 skrev Holger Baxmann:
btw: who is talking about jboss-client?
All I am saying is that there will be many different devices with
different VM's out there soon ... and for us to have a compatible
jboss-client build for each and every one of them is a mas
Can you send me your email address? Can't seem to send you email through
sourceforge.
Thanks,
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group, LLC
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great
Bugs item #652628, was opened at 2002-12-12 13:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=652628&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Heiko W.Rupp (pilhuhn)
Assigned to: Chri
Bugs item #652628, was opened at 2002-12-12 13:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=652628&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
>Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Heiko W.Rupp (pilhuhn)
>Assigned to: Chr
Solved, a fresh checkout is compiling, sorry to bother.
I thought that cvs update -dP jboss-head should work also but it didn't...
Calin
- Original Message -
From: "Calin Lupa Crisan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: [
Bugs item #652628, was opened at 2002-12-12 13:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=652628&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Heiko W.Rupp (pilhuhn)
Assigned to: Nobody/An
Hi Bill,
1. What have you worked on in the past?
XSL driven deployment of JMS Providers,
XSL driven deployment of NoTx-datasources
CronScheduler,
ApplicationDeadlockRetryInterceptor
various reliability aspects (deadlocks, interceptors, memory leaks,
thread leaks)
2. What are you currently wor
Bugs item #652576, was opened at 2002-12-12 11:13
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=652576&group_id=22866
Category: JBossSOAP
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dr. Christoph Georg Jung (cgjung)
Assigned
Not yet. I tweaked it ~3 weeks ago to somehow run through, but there may
have been changes such that
I should change it.
CGJ
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: John Fawcett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2002 22:21
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: RE: [JBoss-dev] j
hi Bill,
- I have done bug fixes a
--- Bill Burke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Hi all!
>
> Its time to gear up and embark on the journey that
> is JBoss 4.0. Our
> schedule is ambitious. We want to get a release
> done by JavaOne(the next
> JBossOne) in June 2003 so its gonna take a lot of
Bugs item #652520, was opened at 2002-12-12 08:04
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=652520&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 9
Submitted By: Artemiy Zinoviev (bedriven)
Assigned
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 00.41 skrev Holger Baxmann:
btw: who is talking about jboss-client? i will have clustering across a
whole fabrication line, a whole plant over highspeed i/o ports or
similar
ieee implementations.
Utility Communications Architecture (UCA)
Generic Object Models fo
40 matches
Mail list logo
