[JBoss-dev] Updated class loading architecture doc available

2003-01-02 Thread Scott M Stark
An updated excerpt on the class loading architecture from the 3.0.5RC1 version of the JBoss Administration and Development book has been made available on SourceForge here: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/jboss/ClassLoading.pdf?download It contains a discussion of the Java type system and how c

RE: [JBoss-dev] Jboss + Junit?

2003-01-02 Thread Bill Burke
Title: Message James,   The way JBoss Unit tests work is that an EAR, SAR, EJB Jar, whatever is built.  The client test remotely hot-deploys the EAR, SAR, whatever, and then calls methods on the EJBS, MBeans, whatever to test things.   I'd really like to productize our testsuite and am looki

RE: [JBoss-dev] Jboss + Junit?

2003-01-02 Thread James Higginbotham
Title: Message Bill,   Thanks for the tip, this is some interesting stuff.. I was thinking of taking it one step further and constructing a TestRunner that is really an mbean. So, you could in fact deploy your ear, a jar with the unit tests, then through the console run a single class's test

[JBoss-dev] [ANN] JMX ECIPSE VIEWER Preview Release

2003-01-02 Thread Stefan Groschupf
Hello JBoss-Friends, I'm to late, I'm every time so much to late. I'm very sorry about that! ;( I suggest Marcf in Malorca to write a JMX Gui for JBoss. A fucking commercial job waste really all my time and nerves, so I need a half year to start with this job. Now I spend my holydays, to make the

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-661335 ] JBoss links ejbs to tables in wrong tablespace

2003-01-02 Thread noreply
Bugs item #661335, was opened at 2003-01-02 14:10 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=661335&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Peter Luttrell (objec) Assigned to:

RE: [JBoss-dev] Jboss + Junit?

2003-01-02 Thread Bill Burke
Title: Jboss + Junit? Our Junit extensions support all of what you want.   Its under testsuite/...   We need somebody to document this stuff.  Somebody volunteered once, but never got back to me.   Bill -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On B

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-661335 ] JBoss links ejbs to tables in wrong tablespace

2003-01-02 Thread noreply
Bugs item #661335, was opened at 2003-01-02 16:10 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=661335&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Peter Luttrell (objec) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] Jboss + Junit?

2003-01-02 Thread James Higginbotham
Title: Jboss + Junit? Hi, I wanted to drop this note on the dev list since this question is in regards to a previous posting on the dev list. I had heard that the jboss team had made some extensions to Junit, is that right? If so, what were they in a nutshell? Can someone point me to the so

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 2-January-2003

2003-01-02 Thread scott . stark
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 1004 Successful tests: 998 Errors:5 Failures: 1 [time of test: 2003-01-02.12-08 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1]

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2003-01-02 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version "1.3.1_06" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standar

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2003-01-02 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version "1.3.1_06" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standar

AW: [JBoss-dev] Updating to use Axis 1.1 beta

2003-01-02 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Tom, There is already a patch for jboss.net submitted which addresses some additional exceptions raised in the Axis1.1 beta. I think that I will be able to apply it such that jboss.net will cope with both 1.0 and 1.1 ... I would also give my ok for putting the 1.1 binaries into head, but I would