===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Academic Qualifications available from prestigious NONACCREDITTED universities.
Do you have the knowledge and the experience but lack the qualifications?
Are you getting turned down time and time again for the job of your dreams because you
just don't have the right letters after your name?
Ge
mmmhm, RelaxNG is a superset for XML Schema. It could be handled W3C
Schema compliant and could generate standardized XSD from its own
Schema. AFAIR via XSLT.
I would suggest it because of the comfortable, easy and short way to
_get_grip_. I know of no other XML Application which could go fr
Bugs item #842237, was opened at 2003-11-14 18:59
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=842237&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Prior
Bugs item #832429, was opened at 2003-10-29 16:00
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by skulawik
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=832429&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
>Status: Open
Resolution: Fixed
Priority:
it depends, actually we could try to merge the 3 schemas into one :
ejb-jar + jboss + jbosscmp = one schema with 3 namespaces
and then find a tool that accept it.
> Will we be able to have, say, entity related data from ejb-jar.xml,
> jboss.xml and jbosscmp-jdbc.xml in the same class? Or will we n
Will we be able to have, say, entity related data from ejb-jar.xml,
jboss.xml and jbosscmp-jdbc.xml in the same class? Or will we need three
classes?
Ricardo Argüello wrote:
Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Ricardo Argüello wrote:
Why not use JAXB, or BEA's XMLBeans?
Perhaps. But I don't have much o
Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Ricardo Argüello wrote:
Why not use JAXB, or BEA's XMLBeans?
Perhaps. But I don't have much of experience with JAXB and no at all
with XMLBeans. So, maybe you can tell me why?
Because it will generate the complex object model specified in the J2EE
Deployment Descripto
It does not work when corresponding elements (e.g. entity) are in
different order in each DD.
Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
I mimic current metadata classes but add more data, for example, for
EntityMetaData (so that, i can get rid of JDBCMetaData).
It would be easier to look at the code really.
It
Ricardo Argüello wrote:
Why not use JAXB, or BEA's XMLBeans?
Perhaps. But I don't have much of experience with JAXB and no at all
with XMLBeans. So, maybe you can tell me why?
Since in J2EE 1.4 deployment descriptors are specified in XML Schema, it
should be very easy to get an object model fro
julien viet wrote:
so it is IOC metadata parsing :-)
Exactly :)
so the MetaData classes are pretty much the same, what just differ is the
feeding method and you removed some metadata classes ?
Yes
---
This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMy
Schema files are already located in server/resource/org/jboss/metadata.
The current metadata bindings are in server/src/org/jboss/metadata. I
would say these should be updated with whatever new binding is created.
Ricardo Argüello wrote:
Should we create a new module for this, or use the server m
There has been some look into jaxb and it has been found wanting on
its ability to merge from multiple sources into an object model. What
does the xmlbeans provide in this regard?
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Ricardo Argüell
Should we create a new module for this, or use the server module?
Where should we put XML Schema files, and generated Java files?
Ricardo Argüello
Ricardo Argüello wrote:
Why not use JAXB, or BEA's XMLBeans?
Since in J2EE 1.4 deployment descriptors are specified in XML Schema,
it should be very
Why complicate things so much?
Sun provides XML Schema files, no RelaxNG ones.
Even if RelaxNG is far better than XML Schema (it is):
1) We don't have Relax NG descriptors. We would have to *translate* the
official, Sun provided, XML Schema files.
2) We don't have tools to map RelaxNG to an obje
you would have to translate schema to relaxNG first, and relaxNG does
validation only. maybe there is a binding tool.
from my experience with schema, XML W3C schema are a big mess,they are
ambigous, there is not a formal model underlysing etc.. and relax is cool.
But schema are widely accepted (mi
J2EE 1.4 Deployment Descriptors are specified in XML Schema, not in RelaxNG:
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/
And if they were, what we need is to map them to a Java object model.
For the curious, there is some experimental support for RelaxNG under JAXB:
http://java.sun.com/webservices/docs/1.2/j
IMHO RelaxNG could be the tool to get grip with thiss issue.
bax
Am 15.11.2003 um 06:25 schrieb Ricardo Argüello:
Why not use JAXB, or BEA's XMLBeans?
Since in J2EE 1.4 deployment descriptors are specified in XML Schema,
it should be very easy to get an object model from that, using any
XML
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
22 matches
Mail list logo
