[JBoss-dev] jboss-head-jdk-matrix build.1955 Build Fixed

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head-jdk-matrix?log=log20060629040219Lbuild.1955 BUILD COMPLETE-build.1955Date of build:06/29/2006 04:02:19Time to build:49 minutes 3 secondsLast changed:06/29/2006 03:51:59Last log entry:Remove

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossXB dependencies

The solution is the same for all optional code. These should be plugins rather than integrated directly into the core infrastructure. On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 04:35 -0500, Heiko Braun wrote: The latest XB version introduced a dependency towards JAF and Java Mail. Currently these jars reside under

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossXB dependencies

We already managed to factor out the dependencies. Still it would be interesting to me how you picture this plugin mechanism. /Heiko -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Brock Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 1:40 PM To: JBoss.org

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossXB dependencies

Heiko, you can assign this one to me. Adrian Brock wrote: The solution is the same for all optional code. These should be plugins rather than integrated directly into the core infrastructure. On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 04:35 -0500, Heiko Braun wrote: The latest XB version introduced a

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossXB dependencies

Like any other, define an interface then load the implementation class using dynamic classloading. On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 06:55 -0500, Heiko Braun wrote: We already managed to factor out the dependencies. Still it would be interesting to me how you picture this plugin mechanism. /Heiko

Re: [JBoss-dev] Tomcat 6 redeploy.

-Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 4:00 PM To: Sacha Labourey; Robb Greathouse; Stan Silvert; Ryan Campbell; 'JBoss.org development list'; Scott M Stark Cc: The Core; Bill Burke Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Tomcat 6 redeploy. -snip- Maybe these

Re: [JBoss-dev] Tomcat 6 redeploy.

I thought I would clarify because my lost post sounded rather jerkish. (sorry). I am not disagreeing that code stability is not a higher priority. What my point is, is that the concept of facilitating updates that minimize the downtime of an application is not flawed. I see your point in that

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head-jdk-matrix Build Failed

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head-jdk-matrix?log=log20060629220237 BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:/services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-common.xml:212: The following error occurred while executing this line:

[JBoss-dev] jbossweb build.105 Build Successful

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jbossweb?log=log20060629220016Lbuild.105 BUILD COMPLETE-build.105Date of build:06/29/2006 22:00:16Time to build:36 minutes 35 seconds Unit Tests: (0) Total Errors and

[JBoss-dev] jbossweb-windows build.39 Build Successful

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jbossweb-windows?log=log20060629223704Lbuild.39 BUILD COMPLETE-build.39Date of build:06/29/2006 22:37:04Time to build:46 minutes 27 seconds Unit Tests: (0) Total Errors

[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2-testsuite Build Completed With Testsuite Errors

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-testsuite?log=log20060629235452 TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message:/services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-common.xml:249: The following error occurred while executing this line:

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head-jdk-matrix Build Failed

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head-jdk-matrix?log=log20060630005109 BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:/services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-common.xml:212: The following error occurred while executing this line: