Re: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: Bug in EntityMultiInstanceSynchronizationInterceptor.java ?

2002-04-09 Thread tom yeh
you can save a lot of loading time if you could check to see if the data stored in the EntityContext is still in sync with the db row. Dain, you already answered the reason for Option B. However, when you said very little we can reuse, you seems to assume CMP. In our cases, we use Option B and

RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: Bug in EntityMultiInstanceSynchronizationInterceptor.java ?

2002-04-09 Thread tom yeh
Bill, thanks for configuration, but it is the same as what I am trying. gt;Henri wrote: gt;the EntityMultiInstanceSynchronizationInterceptor.java gt;implementation of jboss 2.4.4 always calling gt;ejbPassivate() no matter it is Option B or Option C. After logging messages and examining the