.
xxx
>-Original Message-
>From: Ryan Campbell
>Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 18:46
>To: Jason T. Greene; Thomas Diesler
>Cc: QA; 'jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net'
>Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: JBossRetro, JBossWS and JDK1.4
>
>I didn'
AM
To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thomas Diesler
Cc: QA; Adrian Brock
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: JBossRetro, JBossWS and JDK1.4
Codewise, they are identical. The intention is to maintain one codebase
across both versions of the JDK. So there is no need for another tag.
-
Ok, so I will perform the Javassist 3.2.0.CR1 release and will include
the change comments from Adrian's commits in the Readme.html unless he
sends me something different.
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JavassistReleaseGuide
-Original Message-
From: Shigeru Chiba [mailto:[EMAIL
rch 17, 2006 11:19 AM
> To: Thomas Diesler
> Cc: QA; Adrian Brock; jboss-development
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] RE: JBossRetro, JBossWS and JDK1.4
>
> Thomas,
>
> I noticed that you have tags for JBOSSWS_1_0_* but not specifically
for
> JBossWS14. So do the versions for jbos
Thomas,
I noticed that you have tags for JBOSSWS_1_0_* but not specifically for
JBossWS14. So do the versions for jbossws14 in the repository
correspond to the JBOSSWS_1_0_* tags?
http://repository.jboss.com/jboss/jbossws14/
I was planning on creating a JBossWS14_1_0_0_CR3, but I see you have a
We need to speak to Chiba.
I don't know whether he has even seen my latest fixes yet? ;-)
On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 10:39 -0600, Ryan Campbell wrote:
> For the Javassist release, how can this be handled?
>
> I think we need a Javassist_3_2_1_CR1. QA will handle the release
> unless told otherwise.
For the Javassist release, how can this be handled?
I think we need a Javassist_3_2_1_CR1. QA will handle the release
unless told otherwise. I assume it will need to be published to SF.
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBQA-324
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Brock
Sent: Friday, M
Correct.
On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 10:09 -0600, Ryan Campbell wrote:
> As a part of 5:
>
> backport-concurrent and jbossretro-rt are both needed in
>
> 1. The client dir
> 2. server/all/lib
>
> Correct?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Adrian Brock
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 7:03 AM
> T
Also, isn't there an implicit update to jbossxb needed? This is a binary
component in the 4.0.x branch being build from the jboss-head contents:
I created an issue for 4.0.4.GA
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-2959
> -Original Message-
> From: Adrian Brock
> Sent: Friday,
As a part of 5:
backport-concurrent and jbossretro-rt are both needed in
1. The client dir
2. server/all/lib
Correct?
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Brock
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 7:03 AM
To: jboss-development
Cc: QA
Subject: Re: JBossRetro, JBossWS and JDK1.4
I missed one
1a) T
Create a jira issue for this so we can link to whatever change notes for
ejb3/hibernate exist please.
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Burke
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 8:05 AM
> To: Scott M Stark
> Cc: Adrian Brock; jboss-development; QA
> Subject: Re: JBossRetro, JBossWS and JDK1.4
i still need to backmerge ejb3 anyways...Hope to get to it later today.
Scott M Stark wrote:
I agree. The point of the CR2 is to get a release with jbossws with a
jbossretro 1.4.x binary compatible drop for testing by users. The
release will wait for this to happen. The JBBUILD-188 does not have
Ok, I am adding the subtasks to JBBUILD-188
-Original Message-
From: Scott M Stark
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 9:55 AM
To: Adrian Brock; jboss-development
Cc: QA
Subject: RE: JBossRetro, JBossWS and JDK1.4
I agree. The point of the CR2 is to get a release with jbossws with a
jbossretro
I agree. The point of the CR2 is to get a release with jbossws with a
jbossretro 1.4.x binary compatible drop for testing by users. The
release will wait for this to happen. The JBBUILD-188 does not have all
of the subtasks so they need to be added for assignment in order to get
a jbossws snapshot.
I missed one
1a) Tag and release JBossRetro
On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 12:59 +, Adrian Brock wrote:
> Let's move this discussion here so we make sure everybody
> is "on the same page".
>
> I want to get this done before 4.0.4CR2
> so the community has a chance to test it,
> rather than dumping i
15 matches
Mail list logo
