Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-25 Thread David Jencks
On Friday, January 24, 2003, at 12:37 PM, Sacha Labourey wrote: Hello David, oh yes! This problem really involves all management parts i.e. how we want to be able to store the config, modify the config, have config repositories, etc. Furthermore, we need to take in account in this new design

RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-24 Thread Sacha Labourey
]]De la part de Matt Munz Envoyé : mercredi, 22 janvier 2003 19:39 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service BTW, I realize that the name Master Configuration Service may be misleading. It only configures the JMX RW attributes

RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-24 Thread Matt Munz
Labourey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Fri 1/24/2003 8:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service Can it be used at server startup instead of the jboss

RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-24 Thread Sacha Labourey
Title: RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service  Oh, no, nothing wrong at all. It is just that while I can easily see an advantage to take a snapshot of a server config for future reference or analysis, re-loading a previous seems as hazardous to me because

RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-24 Thread Matt Munz
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Sacha Labourey Sent: Fri 1/24/2003 9:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-24 Thread Sacha Labourey
Title: RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service  Not exatly. Take a look at the Naming Service MBean for example. It has a Port and IPAddress RW attribute for example because when the MBean is started the following occurs: - an instance of the Naming

Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-24 Thread Scott M Stark
PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 6:59 AM Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service Sacha, I don't really understand. What good is a RW attribute if changing it has no effect? If this is really the case, then I think a lot of those RW

RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-24 Thread Matt Munz
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service Not exatly. Take a look at the Naming Service MBean for example. It has a Port and IPAddress RW attribute

Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-24 Thread David Jencks
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Sacha Labourey Sent: Fri 1/24/2003 10:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service Not exatly. Take a look at the Naming Service MBean for example. It has a Port and IPAddress RW

RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-24 Thread Sacha Labourey
I'd like to see more advantages before undertaking such an enormous project. oh yes! This problem really involves all management parts i.e. how we want to be able to store the config, modify the config, have config repositories, etc. Furthermore, we need to take in account in this new design

Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-24 Thread David Jencks
On Friday, January 24, 2003, at 11:53 AM, Sacha Labourey wrote: I'd like to see more advantages before undertaking such an enormous project. oh yes! This problem really involves all management parts i.e. how we want to be able to store the config, modify the config, have config

RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-24 Thread Sacha Labourey
Hello David, oh yes! This problem really involves all management parts i.e. how we want to be able to store the config, modify the config, have config repositories, etc. Furthermore, we need to take in account in this new design the really-missing-restart-feature which is not

Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-24 Thread Scott M Stark
-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service Well, then you cannot update the list of the JMX interceptors as you cycle your service, right? Otherwise, how do you cycle the ServiceContext interceptor? At one point, independently of where do you manage that, I am pretty sure

RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-24 Thread Vesco Claudio
to a the ServiceController to be restarted or deactivated. Claudio -Original Message- From: Sacha Labourey [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 7:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service Yes, I

Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-24 Thread Scott M Stark
Configuration Service this one didn't make it either... -Original Message- From: Matt Munz Sent: Fri 1/24/2003 12:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service David, If you will, take a step back with me

RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-24 Thread Matt Munz
Scott, Email is bad format for emoting -- intent is often misinterpreted. I sincerely hope that I have not offended anyone. This is never my intent. I don't understand. I don't understand how the RW attribute issue relates to the service lifecycle. I am not being critical, I am not

RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-22 Thread Matt Munz
Dain, I put this together with your use cases in mind. If possible, check it out, and let me know what you think. - Matt -Original Message- From: SourceForge.net [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] [

RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-22 Thread Bill Burke
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matt Munz Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service Dain, I put this together with your use cases in mind. If possible, check it out, and let me know what you

RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-22 Thread Matt Munz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service I am doing some things around MetaData and centralized configuration and configuration chains in AOP that I'd like

RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-22 Thread Matt Munz
- From: Matt Munz Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 1:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service Bill, I read the forum, and I'm not sure how this relates to MBean Persistence. Your examples seem to be AOP-specific. Could