I have not done any checkins on the VirtualFile.java today, but the
current version does have the expansion correct:
/**
* @author [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* @version $Revision: 1.3 $
*/
I would assume this is a svn issue as it does not do expansion by
default:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en
You (or eclipse) have checked in the file with the -kk flag. There is a
command to change this but I don't remember by heart, so the quick and
dirty way is to remove and re-add, as a text file.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of He
I just tried using pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and I'm not
seeing this problem so it must have been a transient issue.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Inc.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
thanx
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott M Stark [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 6:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] cvs lock waiting
>
> Its been cleared.
>
>
> Scott Stark
>
Its been cleared.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Inc.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Vesco Claudio
> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 1:25 AM
> To: Jboss Dev (Posta e
I fixed it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben
Wang
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 10:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Cvs head build error
Hi,
I just did a fresh check out (from jboss-head). Here is the build error
I got
Everyone is seeing this and the site status page indicates this is
planned:
https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2352&group_id=1
( 2004-01-19 06:55:43 - Project CVS Service ) The developer CVS
downtime has been extended. The next update regarding this service will
occur at 9AM
Thanks!
Francisco
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003, Scott M Stark wrote:
> The thirdparty directory is just a collection of other alias checkouts.
> You already had avalon checked into the thirdparty/apache/avalon dir
> in 3.2, so checkout thirdparty/apache/avalon on head and add the
> libs. I have done this
The thirdparty directory is just a collection of other alias checkouts.
You already had avalon checked into the thirdparty/apache/avalon dir
in 3.2, so checkout thirdparty/apache/avalon on head and add the
libs. I have done this and added a new alias to the _jboss_thirdparty
so add the apache-avalo
use your user id to checkout instead,
anonymous access is flakey
-- Juha
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Ricardo Argüello wrote:
> I was trying to do an anonymous checkout of jboss-head and it loooks
> like there is a lock in the cvs:
>
> cvs server: [11:24:21] waiting for anoncvs_jboss's lock in /cvsro
That is standard behavior for cvs as far as I know and relates to its
lack of real directory support. You can just checkout the missing directory
using the associated module alias. For example, if I remove the jboss-3.2/varia
directory, I can refresh it using:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] jboss-3.2] cvs co -r
Try it now, the problem report regarding cvs synch has been marked as fixed.
--
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
--
Comment By: Ari Gordon-Schlosberg (regs)
D
Scott M Stark wrote:
Its an issue that needs to be resolved by sourceforge support. I
have created a support request for this:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=827243&group_id=1&atid=21
Brian Towles wrote:
Howdy
Sorry I dont mean to be a CVS "PITA" but can someone
Its an issue that needs to be resolved by sourceforge support. I
have created a support request for this:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=827243&group_id=1&atid=21
Brian Towles wrote:
Howdy
Sorry I dont mean to be a CVS "PITA" but can someone else try an anon
fresh e
Brian Towles wrote:
Anyone else having problems getting to CVS..
Its rejecting anon login from mulitple locations for me but i can get
into other sf cvs projects (ie gaim)
Thanks
-=Brian
I just tried an checkout of xdoclet. This worked very fine.
cvs update of JBoss-3.2.2 fails for nearly one
Others have indicated this is occurring. You can check the sourceforge status
page to see if this is a known problem. They are supposedly in the process of
upgrading the cvs setup so this could be related.
Try accessing a cvs snapshot from here:
http://jboss.sourceforge.net/snapshots/
x
As of right now Fri Oct 3 09:43:29 UTC 2003, it looks ok from here.
--
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Adrian Brock wrote:
Anybody else having problems connecting to cvs?
Regards,
Adrian
--
anonymous login o.k.
co jboss-all timeout
bax
Am Donnerstag, 02.10.03 um 23:53 Uhr schrieb Adrian Brock:
Anybody else having problems connecting to cvs?
Regards,
Adrian
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
--
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Adrian Brock
> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 5:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] CVS
>
>
> Anybody else having problems connecting to cvs?
>
> Regards,
> Adrian
> --
> xxx
I had submitted a couple of support requests to sf on this issue and they
have been closed so perhaps the issue is fixed.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Roka-Aardal" <[EMAIL PROTECT
jython is not used
The required third party libraries are defined
by the pseudo module _jboss_thirdparty
See CVSROOT/modules for more info.
Regards,
Adrian
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message---
Yesterday I did not notice any particularly slow behavior with cvs. This morning it
does seem slow and pings are dropping many packets.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "julien viet" <[EMAIL
No problems here in Toronto.
> -Original Message-
> From: julien viet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 9:17 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] cvs issues
>
>
> I got issues with CVS today (and previous days as well)
> CVS is very slow or connection
Me too.
Though, I can't say for sure that it's SF's problem. My internet
access last time is also bad.
alex
Tuesday, March 18, 2003, 4:16:38 PM, julien viet wrote:
jv> I got issues with CVS today (and previous days as well)
jv> CVS is very slow or connection times out often.
jv> For you ?
-
Thanks Mr.Kristian.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Kristian Köhler
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 1:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: AW: [JBoss-dev] CVS SnapShot
>
>
> Hi
>
> there is a snapshot page at
>
> http://jboss.sour
It appears we have stopped creating these. I'll put out a fresh snapshot tomorrow.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Rhett Aultman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday,
hi,
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 09:13, Calin Lupa Crisan wrote:
> Thanks Robert,
>
> but my actual question seems to be lost in the message body, so I repeat it:
>
> If I understood correctly the CVS ADMINISTRATION POLICY web page is
> outdated.
> Is there another place than mailing list archives to
Thanks Robert,
but my actual question seems to be lost in the message body, so I repeat it:
If I understood correctly the CVS ADMINISTRATION POLICY web page is
outdated.
Is there another place than mailing list archives to look for
updated/explained information on actual cvs policy ?
I would l
The JMXDoclet Task not defined problem that Marc sees is almost always
a sign of a poor checkout in my opinion.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T
handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourcefo
M
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS connection parameters
This has been occuring lately. I just checked in some code so try it again.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "
This has been occuring lately. I just checked in some code so try it again.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Munz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "JBoss Developers Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rel_3_0_0_7. The cvs naming is somewhere in the developer section of the site.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Antman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, Se
I set environment variable JAVA_OPTS=-Xmx128m, default is 64m.
But build failed with similar error like yours, posted on the
xdoclet-dev mailing list.
There is a hint to increase available memory for ant using env ANT_OPTS.
So I also set ANT_OPTS=-Xmx128m and build was successful now.
Thanks
Fra
Thanks, I forwarded this to the xdoclet list with a couple more details
about our build script.
david jencks
On 2002.09.03 02:34:07 -0400 "Langelage, Frank" wrote:
> My build is running on a Siemens-Nixdorf RM200, OS Reliant-Unix 5.45,
> JDK 1.3.1.
> The output of build for module server is att
My build is running on a Siemens-Nixdorf RM200, OS Reliant-Unix 5.45,
JDK 1.3.1.
The output of build for module server is attached.
I do a daily checkout and build an did not have this problems before.
Frank Langelage
David Jencks wrote:
>Thanks for the report. I didn't experience this or I
Thanks for the report. I didn't experience this or I wouldn't have checked
it in without further discussion. Could you provide details of your
system?
Thanks
david jencks
On 2002.09.02 16:57:58 -0400 "Langelage, Frank" wrote:
> David Jencks wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Since xdoclet is getting read
David Jencks wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Since xdoclet is getting ready to release their 1.2 version I converted cvs
>HEAD (JBoss 4) to use an xdoclet cvs snapshot.
>
>Please report new problems and inconsistencies.
>
>I didn't see any new problems before I committed, since then I noticed that
>apparently
Anatoly Akkerman wrote:
> Hi, guys
>
> I've been trying to look at the files in CVS through the Sourceforge CVS
> view but can't see any files no matter what branch option I chose. Is
> something screwed up with JBoss' CVS tags or Sourceforge viewer is just
> dumb? Any way to view the reposito
Submit a request to SF and tell them which project and where the lock(s)
are. They should clear them in a day or two.
--jason
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks
> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 8:07 AM
> To: jboss-d
Post a bug report to the sourceforge project using this link:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=21
and state that a stale lock needs to be removed and give the full
cvs path that has the lock.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, L
I've had this before on a (non-sourceforge) CVS repository, the lock file in
the repository needs to deleted, I guess you have to be a sourceforge
administrator to do this?
Here's a bit about it in the CVS manual...
http://www.cvshome.org/docs/manual/cvs_10.html#SEC88
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at
And I can't do a commit
david
On 2002.06.21 12:07:47 -0400 marc fleury wrote:
> I can't do a CO
>
> marcf
>
> x
> Marc Fleury, Ph.D
> President
> JBoss Group, LLC
> x
>
>
>
> ---
> Sponsored by:
> ThinkGee
Yeah, also to browse it online fails. It seems that cvs.sourceforge.net
is down.
Andy
- Original Message -
From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:07 AM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] cvs down?
> I
||I was just kidding... I was smoking blunts =P
|
|Ah then I am not the one to blame you :T
I miss saying hi to my little green friends
marcf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-dev
|I was just kidding... I was smoking blunts =P
Ah then I am not the one to blame you :T
marcf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
>|Burke
>|Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 2:59 PM
>|To: Jason Dillon
>|Cc: Jboss-Dev
>|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS HEAD in danger
>|
>|
>|Dude, I was in a bad mood this morning. Sorry for being harsh.
>|
>|> -Original Mes
e for the server side video blurb (upcoming)
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
|Burke
|Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 2:59 PM
|To: Jason Dillon
|Cc: Jboss-Dev
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS HEAD in danger
|
|
|Dude, I was in a bad mood
Dude, I was in a bad mood this morning. Sorry for being harsh.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
> Dillon
> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 5:51 PM
> To: Bill Burke
> Cc: Jboss-Dev
> Subject: RE: [JBoss
> Fucking chill! I merged then committed. Everything is fine.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
> > Dillon
> > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 3:28 AM
> > To: Bill Burke
&g
Fucking chill! I merged then committed. Everything is fine.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
> Dillon
> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 3:28 AM
> To: Bill Burke
> Cc: Jboss-Dev
> Subject: Re: [JBoss
WHAT!!!?? This is not cool... I am still early into reading 300+ messages for
today... one of which I think you posted saying things are cool... BUT
It is not cool to not update your workspace before committing. Marc has done
this before and it just ends up in lost work... some of my work...
Negative. Merge the changes into your view before committing
by updating your view. Don't just dump old code into main.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Burke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
What a trully bizzare diff... I don't understand how it comes up with
this... but whatever works.
--jason
Jason Dillon wrote:
> User: user57
> Date: 02/04/19 16:40:36
>
> Modified:jbossTag: Branch_3_0 build.xml
> Log:
> o include iiop & jboss.net in standard group
> o drop o
riginal Message-
>>|From: Chris Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>|Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 9:35 AM
>>|To: marc fleury
>>|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss-all - Imported sources
>>|
>>|
>>|marc fleury wrote:
>>|> initial impor
go through
> don't worry about it,
>
> marcf
>
> |-Original Message-
> |From: Chris Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> |Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 9:35 AM
> |To: marc fleury
> |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss-all - Imported sources
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 9:35 AM
|To: marc fleury
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss-all - Imported sources
|
|
|marc fleury wrote:
|> initial import on jboss-all??
|>
|> who the FUCK is chris stevenson?
|>
|> what is going on here?
initial import on jboss-all??
who the FUCK is chris stevenson?
what is going on here??
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris
|stevenson
|Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 8:16 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] C
You beat me :-)))
Claudio
> -Original Message-
> From: Francisco Reverbel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: build/jboss build.xml
>
> User: reverbel
> Date: 02/04/19 06:24:58
>
>
Oops - I will do that from now on.
-Larry
> Include the full comment used on the alternate branch when doing
> merges. If I go and look at the history of this file all I see is
> "Copying from Trunk" with a Branch_3_0 filter and I have to go
> hunt down the other branch change to see the comment
Include the full comment used on the alternate branch when doing
merges. If I go and look at the history of this file all I see is
"Copying from Trunk" with a Branch_3_0 filter and I have to go
hunt down the other branch change to see the comment.
Scott Stark
Chief Techno
Hello,
I believe it must be the one I posted here:
http://main.jboss.org/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=13030.
All I did was to copy/paste and fill in the blanks. Nothing in comparison to the work
you and all Jboss developers are doing !
Thanks,
Jerome.
* * *
View thread online: http://main.jbo
I have submitted a request to SF.NET to drop this lock... this is really
starting to piss me off.
--jason
lsanders wrote:
> I'm having trouble with the cvs repository. It is reporting a cvs
> lock in /cvsroot/jboss/manual/src/metadata. Is there anything I can
> do to fix this?
>
>
>
> -
: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update:
jboss-system/src/main/org/jboss/deployment MainDeployer.java
> Why are we dropping log.debug gaurds?
>
> --jason
>
>
> Quoting
Why are we dropping log.debug gaurds?
--jason
Quoting Scott M Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> User: starksm
> Date: 02/04/14 13:19:55
>
> Modified:src/main/org/jboss/deployment MainDeployer.java
> Log:
> Fixed the wacked indentation and formatting
>
> Revision ChangesPat
Good... but I would still like to know what happened.
--jason
Quoting Jules Gosnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Panic Over !!
>
> I have added them back, with my changes, and they have remembered their
> history.
>
> Sorry for breaking the build guys.
>
> Let me know if there are any further pro
Or this one?
--jason
Quoting Jules Gosnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> User: jules_gosnell
> Date: 02/04/13 08:51:51
>
> Removed: src/main/org/jboss/deployment MainDeployer.java
> Log:
> fix deployer to compare lastModified against time from file instead of
> system
>
>
Um... how is the "fix" to remove this file?
--jason
Quoting Jules Gosnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> User: jules_gosnell
> Date: 02/04/13 08:51:51
>
> Removed: src/main/org/jboss/deployment/scanner
> URLDeploymentScanner.java
> Log:
> fix deployer to compare
Panic Over !!
I have added them back, with my changes, and they have remembered their
history.
Sorry for breaking the build guys.
Let me know if there are any further problems.
Jules
Jules Gosnell wrote:
> Jason,
>
> I have just moved a couple of files I was working on into Attic instead
>
No read 'Cock-Up thread'
Sorry,
Jules
David Jencks wrote:
> Did you mean to remove these?
> david
>
> On 2002.04.13 11:51:51 -0400 Jules Gosnell wrote:
> > User: jules_gosnell
> > Date: 02/04/13 08:51:51
> >
> > Removed: src/main/org/jboss/deployment/scanner
> >
Did you mean to remove these?
david
On 2002.04.13 11:51:51 -0400 Jules Gosnell wrote:
> User: jules_gosnell
> Date: 02/04/13 08:51:51
>
> Removed: src/main/org/jboss/deployment/scanner
> URLDeploymentScanner.java
> Log:
> fix deployer to compare lastModified
Scott, isn't the persistence manager part of the island that is garbage
collected when container is dereferenced from the system? If not,
shouldn't it? This was my understanding. Maybe I broke this...
-dain
Scott M Stark wrote:
> User: starksm
> Date: 02/04/12 14:39:48
>
> Modified
I already am.
- Original Message -
From: "Dain Sundstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update:
jboss/s
Just curious, are you going to call setContainer(null);
-dain
Scott M Stark wrote:
> User: starksm
> Date: 02/04/12 12:30:44
>
> Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc
> JDBCRelationInterceptor.java JDBCStoreManager.java
> Log:
> Start cleaning
Hey Scott, I am unclear about this change. Why did you change from using
file.getPath() to url.getPath() + translation?
Also, you commented that we might want to drop the OS support. It looks like the SUN
version does not support this, but does that mean that it should not support it?
The po
Thanks. =)
--jason
Scott M Stark wrote:
> User: starksm
> Date: 02/04/05 07:28:37
>
> Modified:src/main/org/jboss/net/protocol/file FileURLConnection.java
> Log:
> Fix the getPermission method.
>
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.4 +12 -36
>jboss-common/src/main/org/jboss
What was the CVSROOT you were using?
--jason
Adrian Brock wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I just applied a fix to Branch_2_4.
>I'm trying to tag with Rel_2_4_5_10.
>It gets part way through, then tells me I haven't got
>write access.
>Is this a file system authority?
>
>bash-2.05$ cvs tag Rel_2_4_5_10
>? jboss
hi,
On Fri, 2002-03-29 at 02:14, Adrian Brock wrote:
> This breaks on Windows :-(
>
> The id is used as a file name in file persistence.
> You are not allowed a : in the file name for windows.
thanks for pointing this out, i've applied a fix for this to the
file-based persistence manager.
it's
That needs to be fixed the file pm level. encode the ':' into something
valid.
Regards,
Hiram
>From: Adrian Brock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbossmq/src/main/org/jboss/mq/server
&g
Hi,
This breaks on Windows :-(
The id is used as a file name in file persistence.
You are not allowed a : in the file name for windows.
Regards,
Adrian
> User: lqd
> Date: 02/03/25 22:55:34
>
> Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mq/server
> r JMSServer.java
> Log:
> Fix for bug #53382
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Vesco Claudio wrote:
> Quick and dirty hack: start jboss with
> JAVA_OPTS=-Dpolicy.expandProperties=false (see jboss.bat or jboss.sh) or
> modify conf/auth.conf + db/hypersonic/default.script as martin has written.
Yes, this worked for me. Thanks, Claudio! Thanks, Xavier!
F
on 27-03-2 16.18, Vesco Claudio at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> modify passord in Default Db
have You tried " " instead of "" ?
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Sorry for my English :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Fagerlund [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 4:05 PM
> To: Vesco Claudio; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS HEAD doesn't start with jdk 1.4 ?
>
on 27-03-2 15.33, Vesco Claudio at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> + db/hypersonic/default.script as martin has written.
whats that ? where ?
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-developme
OK, I have recompiled in Windows NT jboss with jdk 1.4 and I have the
exception.
Quick and dirty hack: start jboss with
JAVA_OPTS=-Dpolicy.expandProperties=false (see jboss.bat or jboss.sh) or
modify conf/auth.conf + db/hypersonic/default.script as martin has written.
Claudio
__
The problem is in the parsing of conf/auth.conf. jboss-sdk1.4 crashes
when parses this fragment:
// Security domain for testing new jca framework
DefaultDbRealm {
//
// Security domain for new jca framework.
// One per ManagedConnectionFactory are required.
org.jboss.resource.sec
Yes, Claudio. I recompiled it with jdk 1.4.
Plain build and iiop build (-Dmodules=iiop) worked fine.
On the testsuite (-Dmodules=testsuite) I got a compilation error.
Cheers,
Francisco
Claudio Vesco wrote:
> Hi alls!
>
> Have you recompiled with jdk 1.4?
>
> Claudio
_
Hi alls!
Have you recompiled with jdk 1.4?
Claudio
> -Original Message-
> From: Ricardo Argüello [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:16 AM
> To: Francisco Reverbel; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS HEAD doesn'
I have the same problem.
JBoss 3.0.0beta2 (CVS HEAD) gives me the same exception with JDK 1.4 on Windows 2000.
Ricardo
- Original Message -
From: "Francisco Reverbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 6:23 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] CVS HEAD doesn't
The cvs, ant and junit tests will let you do the first bit, then the ftp
task can hook up the rest... not that I would really recommend that.
Ant can do all this, it is just a matter of organization and time to
glue things together. Some of this has already been done. Talk with
Chris, he p
on 25-03-2 23.58, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What about CVS do you want integrated?
dont know just freeflowing
- maybe a do a checkout and build - test cycle - ftp report to IP(lubega).
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROT
>
>I would imagine all of the above could be split up and executed as ant tasks
>? ...
>
That depends on what you mean... essentially that is what the bm tasks do.
>how bout intergrating CVS ? ... into the build process ? ...
>
What about CVS do you want integrated?
--jason
__
on 25-03-2 23.42, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1) Provides pseudo-late-binding for properties.
> 2) Provides helper tasks to set system properties, plus a few other
> utilities .
> 3) Provides a mechanism to hook up multipule sub-projects based on
> property configuration.
>
> Perh
>
>
>can U please explain what it does that ant task's can not do ?
>
1) Provides pseudo-late-binding for properties.
2) Provides helper tasks to set system properties, plus a few other
utilities .
3) Provides a mechanism to hook up multipule sub-projects based on
property configuration.
Perha
Jason Dillon wrote:
>>
>
> I fail to see how you go from CVS to Buildmagic to Ant.
>
> --jason
Through the one thing that connects the three: Jason Dillon!
-danch
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/l
on 25-03-2 21.38, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> While on topic of BM can U please explain what it does that ant task's can
>> not do ? and WHY do We have a top level BlackBox instead of a 'standard' way
>> to extend and build with ant ! ... ? ...
> If you can make Ant do what the c
>
>
>>y35 j00 D1d. =P
>>
>
>thats pearl ?;) or BuildMagic lingo ?
>
That is l33t (http://www.geocities.com/mnstr_2000/translate.html)
>While on topic of BM can U please explain what it does that ant task's can
>not do ? and WHY do We have a top level BlackBox instead of a 'standard' way
>to ext
on 25-03-2 01.07, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> y35 j00 D1d. =P
thats pearl ?;) or BuildMagic lingo ?
While on topic of BM can U please explain what it does that ant task's can
not do ? and WHY do We have a top level BlackBox instead of a 'standard' way
to extend and build with an
y35 j00 D1d. =P
I was just communicating what I would have to do to get this fixed.
That is all. So perhaps next time we can be more efficient
collectively to get improper locks removed.
--jason
Peter Fagerlund wrote:
>on 25-03-2 00.25, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>I shoul
on 25-03-2 00.25, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I should be more specific, if there is a lock which persists for an
> extended period of time let us know...
We did - di We not ?
Should We have to do that ?
___
Jboss-development mailing
I should be more specific, if there is a lock which persists for an
extended period of time let us know...
--jason
Jason Dillon wrote:
> This appears to be fixed. If you ever find a lock for anoncvs_jboss
> (or really anoncvs anything) or a maximal lock, please submit a
> request to drop t
1 - 100 of 652 matches
Mail list logo
