TECTED]]On Behalf Of
||Lemoine David-dlemoi01
||Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 11:05 AM
||To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
||Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Custom startup solved !? was: Nested JMX
||Service Groups...??!
||
||
||Hi,
||
||Whatever solution you decide on for this problem, I think it could
||
Original Message-
From: Lemoine David-dlemoi01 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 April 2001 10:31
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Custom startup solved !? was: Nested JMX
Service Groups...??!
Hi,
Well, I'm not saying it's anything important. But for example, XM
Behalf Of
|Lemoine David-dlemoi01
|Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 11:05 AM
|To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Custom startup solved !? was: Nested JMX
|Service Groups...??!
|
|
|Hi,
|
|Whatever solution you decide on for this problem, I think it could
|be a good idea to replace
ECTED]'
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Custom startup solved !? was: Nested JMX
|Service Groups...??!
|
|
|Hi,
|
|Whatever solution you decide on for this problem, I think it could
|be a good idea to replace the current MLet MBean-loader with
|Stacy's XML-based XMLet.
|
|Just my 2 irish
33
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Custom startup solved !? was: Nested JMX
Service Groups...??!
Ok, sorry for the misunderstanding. I think that putting extra methods onto
JBoss MBeans is one technique, but this is an example of meta-data. I think
a better technique would be
00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Custom startup solved !? was: Nested JMX
Service Groups...??!
Stacy,
I like your idea of abstracting the lifecycle mapping.
However, as I understand your description here, it
still does not address my problem.
You suggest t
start/stop a
> subset. I think we should be
> following the style in ant
> and do something like:
>
> depends="really-important"/>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Scott M Stark
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 10 April 2001 23:57
&
3:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Custom startup solved !? was: Nested JMX
Service Groups...??!
Are you talking about a new service that replaces
org.jboss.util.ServiceControl or
a new service? The ServiceControl MBean that manages service lifecyle also
manages service dependencies a
10, 2001 2:09 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Custom startup solved !? was: Nested JMX Service Groups...??!
> I think that the JBoss inspired life-cycle is too restrictive, I'd
> like to be able to define life-cycle schemas in the XMLet resource
> file, or in another XML file. An XMLet ve
I think that the JBoss inspired life-cycle is too restrictive, I'd
like to be able to define life-cycle schemas in the XMLet resource
file, or in another XML file. An XMLet version might look something
like:
10 matches
Mail list logo
