Bugs item #541867, was opened at 2002-04-10 01:14
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=541867group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Luttrell (objec)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Bugs item #541870, was opened at 2002-04-10 01:24
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=541870group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Luttrell (objec)
Assigned to:
User: cgjung
Date: 02/04/09 23:34:59
Modified:jboss.net/testsuite build.sh
Log:
was not updated for some time. I really should install *nix to test all that crap.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +15 -2 contrib/jboss.net/testsuite/build.sh
Index: build.sh
User: cgjung
Date: 02/04/09 23:30:01
Modified:jboss.net/testsuite build.xml
Log:
I hate case-insensitive file-systems.
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +2 -2 contrib/jboss.net/testsuite/build.xml
Index: build.xml
Addendum:
4.5 you have to first utter a jboss-all/testsuite/build because there are
some basic testcase classes which
do the server deployment for us. Maybe these were the unresolved symbols you
were seeing. I added that hint to the
jboss.net/docs/Readme ...
Martin and Marius, any help in
Well, Marc, we did it a little bit on the fly and you said that something was maybe
missing. Are you sure you want me to commit that?
Cheers,
Sacha
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de marc
fleury
on 11-04-2 03.47, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After a bit more thought I think that a minimal server config is
really pointless, though I do think we need to document it somewhere.
Could the configuration folders named default also contain a simple
default_conf_doc.war that would
Peter Braswell wrote:
All,
I'm not sure if this is the *approved* way of doing things, but here's the sequence
that seems to work for me:
1. Do a CVS update, rebuild jboss from jboss-all\build\build.sh or build.bat
depending on your poison.
2. Goto jboss.net and build. Make sure .sar
This means that the testsuite does not find the jboss.net classes, could you
please check
That the class-path at the javac/ task points to
jboss-all/jboss.net/output/lib/jboss-net.sar and that that file
Exists.
CGJ
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Marius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Marius/Christoph
On Linux, I can now run the testsuites completely clean after
a) Running the full JBoss testsuite (actually, just ./build.sh
compile in the testsuite module should suffice but I have not yet
tested this)
b) fixing an incorrect package name in one of the test suite classes
Jung , Dr. Christoph wrote:
This means that the testsuite does not find the jboss.net classes, could you
please check
That the class-path at the javac/ task points to
jboss-all/jboss.net/output/lib/jboss-net.sar and that that file
Exists.
Thanks. This leaves just one error, that I think
Actually, I'm looking for something like
http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs61/notes/issues.html#1056662, but then for JBoss 2.4.3/4
and 3.0.
Sorry for responding so late, but it's been night in Belgium :)
_
View thread online:
Hi,
as mentioned in a previous thread, I'll be posting some questions on clustering,
caching etc. today. Let's get started:
Does JBoss implement
1) Thread Pooling
a) yes
configurable?
I) yes
file: ...
element: ...
= at bean/application/server level
Patches item #541918, was opened at 2002-04-10 09:36
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=541918group_id=22866
Category: JbossSOAP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole (unstable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Martin Maisey
The 2.4.5 release candidate is available from the SourceForge
JBoss files page:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=22866
The changes notes are available here:
http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=83816
The release includes the following:
Christoph,
4.5 you have to first utter a jboss-all/testsuite/build because
there are
some basic testcase classes which
do the server deployment for us. Maybe these were the unresolved
symbols you
were seeing. I added that hint to the
jboss.net/docs/Readme ...
Yes, this was the reason! I don't
on 10-04-2 10.46, Pieter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I'm looking for something like
http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs61/notes/issues.html#1056662, but then for JBoss
2.4.3/4 and 3.0.
Yes - very good - I think this could be collected from a wide variety of
sources like sf.net / forums
Hi,
A Threadpool based notifiction broadcaster, sounds good ;-)
Should I allow concurrent notifications to a listener? This is not
possible at the moment.
Stopping concurrent notifications will require storing a backlog
against the listener registration. This could cause a resource problem
with
Thanks for the (quite constructive and positive) feedback. I guess that
other characters would just go like doesn´t work. baah! Let the dudes
alone.
That´s the spirit. That is satisfying ...
I guess that as long as you contribute small patches and such or take issues
from the bug list, it is
Please submit what You do collect as a patch on sf.net
instead of linking work in progress ...
Hi, I could go through all the SF files. For example, using
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/jboss/jboss-j2ee/src/main/javax/transaction/xa/package.html?rev=1.1
I can find
Patches item #541946, was opened at 2002-04-10 11:38
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=541946group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Emmanuel Valentin (emmanuelv)
Assigned to:
Also fixed/commited..
-peter
- Original Message -
From: Marius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Peter Braswell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:24 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: AW:
http://www.jboss.org/online-manual/HTML/ch13s98.html links to
http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/1.2/docs/javadocs/index.html. Does this mean
the full JavaMail 1.2 API is implemented?
_
View thread online:
Bugs item #541867, was opened at 2002-04-10 06:14
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=541867group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Luttrell (objec)
Assigned to: David Jencks
on 10-04-2 14.34, Pieter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.jboss.org/online-manual/HTML/ch13s98.html links to
http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/1.2/docs/javadocs/index.html. Does this
mean the full JavaMail 1.2 API is implemented?
Yes - there is a handle availible to the full
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
File size or memory foot print.
marc fleury wrote:
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
___
Jboss-development mailing
I saw two JBossMQ patches in there, but there are no plans to upgrade to the current
version of JBossMQ for release 2.4.5?
Corby
_
View thread online: http://main.jboss.org/thread.jsp?forum=66thread=12579
The testing of the backport is having problems so it is not likely
to be included in 2.4.5. It will be released as a seperate patch
when ready and integrated into 2.4.6.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message
Bugs item #537990, was opened at 2002-04-01 12:50
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=537990group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dan Bunker (danbunker)
Assigned to:
Both I guess, both
how small of a download can the smallest server be? 70k? 200k? 3.5M? then your
super-server need only add 70k fat with UnifiedClassLoader and all.
once you run it, what is the smallest footprint I can use in memory? Or is that
relegated to the VM in J2ME and not my issue
Bugs item #533686, was opened at 2002-03-22 11:26
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=533686group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Levart (plevart)
Assigned to:
How about deployables in the root of the distribution tree.
Also, to follow up on Peter's message in a different thread about using
a default.war to document things... I really like that idea. It can
be extended to dynamically show what services can be deployed by looking
in the
Hi
A Threadpool based notifiction broadcaster, sounds good ;-)
Should I allow concurrent notifications to a listener? This is not
possible at the moment.
Stopping concurrent notifications will require storing a backlog
against the listener registration. This could cause a resource problem
Notification Listeners are not required to be thread safe,
although they can be.
If I allow concurrent notifications in the timer and the listener
is synchronized and slow, it is likely to produce thread death
as more and more threads wait at the handler's entry point.
I think the best approach
User: cgjung
Date: 02/04/10 02:58:11
Modified:jboss.net/testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/net/jmx
WSRJMXAccessUnitTestCase.java
Log:
martins patch for package names.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +3 -3
User: mnf999
Date: 02/04/10 06:49:22
Added: src/docs/pictures trevor.jpg
Log:
Update: Added Trevor Squires to the team page
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 newsite/src/docs/pictures/trevor.jpg
Binary file
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/04/10 08:18:45
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/bridge
JDBCCMRFieldBridge.java JDBCEntityBridge.java
Log:
Fixed bug [ 533686 ] JDBCStartCommand.tableExists() Oracle.
Table names are now passed through
User: juhalindfors
Date: 02/04/10 14:26:26
Modified:src/docs/common jboss-jbossmx.jsp
Log:
1.0 dl links
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +57 -7 newsite/src/docs/common/jboss-jbossmx.jsp
Index: jboss-jbossmx.jsp
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/04/10 08:18:45
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/metadata
JDBCEntityMetaData.java JDBCRelationMetaData.java
Log:
Fixed bug [ 533686 ] JDBCStartCommand.tableExists() Oracle.
Table names are now passed through
User: mnf999
Date: 02/04/10 06:49:21
Modified:src/docs index.jsp
Log:
Update: Added Trevor Squires to the team page
Revision ChangesPath
1.55 +3 -3 newsite/src/docs/index.jsp
Index: index.jsp
User: mnf999
Date: 02/04/10 06:49:21
Modified:src/docs/common team.jsp
Log:
Update: Added Trevor Squires to the team page
Revision ChangesPath
1.19 +14 -1 newsite/src/docs/common/team.jsp
Index: team.jsp
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/04/10 08:18:44
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc
JDBCDeclaredSQLQuery.java
JDBCDeleteRelationsCommand.java
JDBCEJBQLCompiler.java
on 10-04-2 18.50, Andrew Scherpbier at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about deployables in the root of the distribution tree.
close but ...
Also, to follow up on Peter's message in a different thread about using
a default.war to document things... I really like that idea. It can
be
User: jules_gosnell
Date: 02/04/10 15:14:01
Modified:src/docs binary.jsp
Log:
update to JBoss-2.4.4_Jetty-3.1.7-1
Revision ChangesPath
1.24 +3 -3 newsite/src/docs/binary.jsp
Index: binary.jsp
scenario: when U dload . one wants instant gratification
( I know Me want ) ...
So HOW ARE U GOING TO DO THAT JASON ... without help ?
***
The People that trained me said - it is ready when it is ready ...
I am willing to work on something like this (for 3.1, not 3.0!!!) if
there is any
User: jules_gosnell
Date: 02/04/10 15:28:18
Modified:jettyTODO
Log:
update
Revision ChangesPath
1.18 +3 -1 contrib/jetty/TODO
Index: TODO
===
RCS file:
on 10-04-2 18.50, Andrew Scherpbier at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about deployables in the root of the distribution tree.
close but ...
Also, to follow up on Peter's message in a different thread about using
a default.war to document things... I really like that idea. It can
be
User: jules_gosnell
Date: 02/04/10 15:39:26
Modified:jettyFAQ
Log:
update
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +12 -9 contrib/jetty/FAQ
Index: FAQ
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/jboss/contrib/jetty/FAQ,v
Bill Burke wrote:
I've just committed and tested Peter Murray's patch for read-only method
locks. Great work Peter!
Sounds great. Does that mean that ejbStore won't be automatically called
after calling read-only methods in a transaction? Or do you still need
to use the isModified flag to
Peter Fagerlund wrote:
scenario: when U dload . one wants instant gratification
( I know Me want ) ...
So HOW ARE U GOING TO DO THAT JASON ... without help ?
What? You are a crack smoker. I have not idea what you are talking
about... =?
--jason
User: juhalindfors
Date: 02/04/10 16:18:09
Modified:src/main/javax/management MBeanServer.java
Log:
and javadoc
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +85 -11jmx/src/main/javax/management/MBeanServer.java
Index: MBeanServer.java
User: juhalindfors
Date: 02/04/10 16:17:25
Modified:src/main/test/compliance/server MBeanServerTEST.java
Log:
rest of the instantiate tests
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +95 -2 jmx/src/main/test/compliance/server/MBeanServerTEST.java
Index:
User: schaefera
Date: 02/04/10 16:38:03
Removed: src/main/org/jboss/test/xa/test Tag: Branch_2_4 Main.java
Log:
Removed the XA test suite.
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
User: schaefera
Date: 02/04/10 16:38:03
Removed: src/main/org/jboss/test/xa/interfaces Tag: Branch_2_4
CantSeeDataException.java XATest.java
XATestHome.java
Log:
Removed the XA test suite.
User: schaefera
Date: 02/04/10 16:38:03
Removed: src/resources/xa Tag: Branch_2_4 client.policy
Log:
Removed the XA test suite.
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
User: starksm
Date: 02/04/10 16:33:55
Modified:src/etc/deploy Tag: Branch_2_4 jbosspool-jdbc.rar
Log:
Update the non-core module binaries to be in synch with the
JBoss_2_4_5_RC1 source tag
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No
User: starksm
Date: 02/04/10 16:33:55
Modified:src/client Tag: Branch_2_4 jboss-j2ee.jar jbossmq-client.jar
jbosssx-client.jar jnp-client.jar
Log:
Update the non-core module binaries to be in synch with the
JBoss_2_4_5_RC1 source tag
Revision
User: starksm
Date: 02/04/10 16:33:57
Modified:src/lib Tag: Branch_2_4 jboss-j2ee.jar jboss-jaas.jar
jboss-jdbc_ext.jar jbosscx.jar jbossmq.jar
jbosspool.jar jbosssx.jar jnpserver.jar
Log:
Update the non-core module binaries to be
Peter Fagerlund wrote:
on 10-04-2 18.50, Andrew Scherpbier at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about deployables in the root of the distribution tree.
close but ...
but what?
Maybe available-services or possible-services
Also, to follow up on Peter's message in a different thread about
User: juhalindfors
Date: 02/04/10 12:29:00
Modified:src/main/javax/management
NotificationBroadcasterSupport.java
Log:
styling
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +35 -19
jmx/src/main/javax/management/NotificationBroadcasterSupport.java
A couple of months ago I committed a jboss.xml read-only entity bean tag
that prevented ejbStore ever being called on a such-marked bean. This new
work makes it so locks on the bean only last as long as the method call
into the bean (as I understand it)
david jencks
On 2002.04.10 15:04:33
I am using the CVS as of this morning. When I try to create a new entity
I get the following backtrace. I am using the postgresql-service with
the SecurityDomainJndiName atrribute commented out. I am also seeing
weird messages to the STDOUT before
18:59:05,143 INFO [STDOUT] !getCompany_id
I am getting these errors over and over again on all of the EJB's I am
deploying
18:58:31,586 INFO [EJBDeployer]
Bean : cadex/AcrossResp
Method : public abstract EJBMetaData getEJBMetaData() throws
RemoteException
Section: 12.2.9
Warning: null
If the home is extended from EJBHome is this
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 577
Successful tests: 518
Errors:55
Failures: 4
[time of test: 11 April 2002 1:25 GMT]
[java.version:
User: jules_gosnell
Date: 02/04/10 12:32:32
Modified:jetty/src/main/org/mortbay/http HttpConnection.java
Log:
carry over Brett's fix for Frequently Hanging On Http Requests
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +7 -5
Just curious - why does JBoss make a copy of everything that goes through the
deployer? It makes sense for remote archives, but it seems wasteful to do this for
every file on my classpath. Does this help with the auto-redeploy features?
Thanks
-Larry
You can pick it up from SourceForge:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=22866
This is the implementation of the JMX 1.0 spec.
-- Juha
_
View thread online: http://main.jboss.org/thread.jsp?forum=66thread=12619
User: mnf999
Date: 02/04/10 12:47:32
Modified:src/docs schedule.jsp
Added: src/docs JBossOne-Clustering.zip
Log:
Update: added Bill and Sacha's presentation to the schedules page.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +3 -1 newsite/src/docs/schedule.jsp
User: jules_gosnell
Date: 02/04/10 12:51:04
Modified:jetty/src/resources/jetty-plugin/META-INF jboss-service.xml
Log:
change default distributed store
Revision ChangesPath
1.26 +1 -1
contrib/jetty/src/resources/jetty-plugin/META-INF/jboss-service.xml
User: jules_gosnell
Date: 02/04/10 12:51:38
Modified:jettyTODO
Log:
update
Revision ChangesPath
1.17 +48 -55contrib/jetty/TODO
Index: TODO
===
RCS file:
Your deployables is quite Queen'ish :-)
it is of some importence how and why we choose a certain word to give
meaning of purpose ... a word is a container of a concept ... then it
could becomme cultural ... if You are not aware ... beware ...
peter_f translation:
I don't like the word
Lets not talk about what names you want to use, it is plain silly and
pointless.
I imagine that if we do anything along these lines, we will provide one
or two seperate configuration directories under server/, then either
provide a toplevel examples/ or something similar under docs/.
But
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 577
Successful tests: 519
Errors:55
Failures: 3
[time of test: 11 April 2002 2:10 GMT]
[java.version:
User: schaefera
Date: 02/04/10 13:04:35
Modified:src/client/admin Tag: Branch_2_4 monitor.jar
Log:
Adjusted the Scheduler Example and removed JSR-77 stuff because this was
just a test.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No
I was under the impression that the deploer was meant to redeploy files
in ./deploy that changed.
i.e. I could over a new version of a .sar, or edit and update e.g.
jetty-service.xml and the service would be restarted with the new
classes/configuration.
It seems that I have to remove the file
User: schaefera
Date: 02/04/10 13:04:51
Removed: src/main/org/jboss/management Tag: Branch_2_4
ContainerManagement.java
ContainerManagementMBean.java DataCollector.java
EJBDataCollector.java JDBCDataCollector.java
User: schaefera
Date: 02/04/10 13:04:48
Modified:src/lib Tag: Branch_2_4 jboss-j2ee.jar jboss-jaas.jar
jboss-jdbc_ext.jar jbosscx.jar jbossmq.jar
jbosspool.jar jbosssx.jar jnpserver.jar
Log:
Adjusted the Scheduler Example and removed
User: schaefera
Date: 02/04/10 13:04:50
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb Tag: Branch_2_4 ContainerFactory.java
Log:
Adjusted the Scheduler Example and removed JSR-77 stuff because this was
just a test.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No
User: schaefera
Date: 02/04/10 13:04:37
Modified:src/etc/conf/default Tag: Branch_2_4 jboss.jcml
Log:
Adjusted the Scheduler Example and removed JSR-77 stuff because this was
just a test.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No
User: schaefera
Date: 02/04/10 13:04:34
Modified:src/client Tag: Branch_2_4 jboss-j2ee.jar jbossmq-client.jar
jbosssx-client.jar jnp-client.jar
Log:
Adjusted the Scheduler Example and removed JSR-77 stuff because this was
just a test.
Revision
The EJB 2.0 verifier is in process. Next time I work on it I'll try to
remove all the code generating spurious messages. Many things have
changed between EJB 1.1 and EJB 2.0, and I didn't catch them all in the
process of moving the code over.
Cheers
Dave Smith wrote:
I am getting these
User: schaefera
Date: 02/04/10 13:04:38
Modified:src/etc/deploy Tag: Branch_2_4 jbosspool-jdbc.rar
Log:
Adjusted the Scheduler Example and removed JSR-77 stuff because this was
just a test.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No
You should not have to removed, a simple touch should do... unless there is a
bug (either in the deployment system or your filsystem =)
--jason
Quoting Jules Gosnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I was under the impression that the deploer was meant to redeploy files
in ./deploy that changed.
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 577
Successful tests: 515
Errors:56
Failures: 6
[time of test: 11 April 2002 3:21 GMT]
[java.version:
David Jencks wrote:
A couple of months ago I committed a jboss.xml read-only entity bean tag
that prevented ejbStore ever being called on a such-marked bean. This new
work makes it so locks on the bean only last as long as the method call
into the bean (as I understand it)
Ah, OK. Thanks
I've wondered too.
IMO it is unnecesary for remote archives, since the jar protocol handler
makes a temporary copy anyway. As far as I know the true reason is that in
windows you cannot delete an open file, so you could never undeploy an
autodeployed file by removing it.
david jencks
On
On 2002.04.10 17:32:35 -0400 Jules Gosnell wrote:
I was under the impression that the deploer was meant to redeploy files
in ./deploy that changed.
i.e. I could over a new version of a .sar, or edit and update e.g.
jetty-service.xml and the service would be restarted with the new
User: luke_t
Date: 02/04/10 19:56:31
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/security/plugins JaasSecurityManager.java
Log:
Removed unused LoginContext local variable in authenticate method.
Revision ChangesPath
1.23 +1 -2
User: mclaugs
Date: 02/04/10 20:04:16
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/resource
ConnectionManagerFactoryLoader.java
Log:
Moved creation of JSR-77 objects to createService and destruction of them
to destroyService
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +35
User: luke_t
Date: 02/04/10 20:15:24
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/security/plugins JaasSecurityManager.java
Log:
Minor simplification to if/else logic in validateCache method.
Revision ChangesPath
1.24 +3 -5
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 577
Successful tests: 517
Errors:55
Failures: 5
[time of test: 11 April 2002 4:26 GMT]
[java.version:
Bugs item #541867, was opened at 2002-04-10 01:14
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=541867group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Luttrell (objec)
Assigned to: David Jencks
Bugs item #541867, was opened at 2002-04-10 01:14
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=541867group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Luttrell (objec)
Assigned to: David Jencks
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 546
Successful tests: 221
Errors:317
Failures: 8
[time of test: 11 April 2002 6:54 GMT]
[java.version:
I just submitted a bunch of patches to allow archives (sar,rar,jar,war and ear) to be
deployed in their exploded form. Could someone with CVS write permissions look them
over?
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=542341group_id=22866atid=376687
Thanks
Patches item #542341, was opened at 2002-04-10 22:53
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=542341group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole (unstable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Larry Sanderson
97 matches
Mail list logo
