Bugs item #643732, was opened at 2002-11-25 20:36
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=643732group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michael Newcomb (mnewcomb)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #643673, was opened at 2002-11-25 18:40
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=643673group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alvaro Mota Goncalves (alvaromota)
tisdagen den 26 november 2002 kl 03.08 skrev Stefan Arentz:
I'd kill to have more test cases and especially performance test
cases. I would love to have tests the spit out a XML file with
timings. Then we could quickly determine the results of a change.
And then create reports similar to
Bugs item #643673, was opened at 2002-11-25 15:40
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=643673group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alvaro Mota Goncalves (alvaromota)
Bugs item #643673, was opened at 2002-11-25 18:40
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=643673group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alvaro Mota Goncalves (alvaromota)
On Tuesday, Nov 26, 2002, at 03:40 Europe/Amsterdam, Dain Sundstrom
wrote:
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 08:08 PM, Stefan Arentz wrote:
I'd kill to have more test cases and especially performance test
cases. I would love to have tests the spit out a XML file with
timings. Then we
Bugs item #644146, was opened at 2002-11-26 15:15
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=644146group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: nicola degara (labradornic)
Assigned to:
tisdagen den 26 november 2002 kl 15.49 skrev Stefan Arentz:
I'd kill to have more test cases and especially performance test
cases. I would love to have tests the spit out a XML file with
timings. Then we could quickly determine the results of a change.
And then create reports similar to
Bugs item #644146, was opened at 2002-11-26 16:15
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=644146group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: nicola degara (labradornic)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #641740, was opened at 2002-11-21 01:37
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=641740group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Later
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Vladimir Korenev (vkorenev)
Bugs item #641740, was opened at 2002-11-21 12:37
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=641740group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Later
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Vladimir Korenev (vkorenev)
folks,
please please please. A clean build of JBoss fails with
buildfragments/tools.eng:29: taskdef class
xdoclet.modules.jmx.JMXDocletTask cannot be found.
What gives?
Also it seems the nightly build from chris is gone?
marcf
xx
Marc Fleury, Ph.D.
President, Founder
JBoss
Marc, pay attention to the dev list, and always explain what you are doing
when you complain.
cvs co jboss-all
hasn't worked for weeks
Try
cvs co jboss-head
cvs co -r Branch_3_2 jboss-3.2
or
cvs co -r Branch_3_0 jboss-3.0
or
cvs co -r Branch_3_0 jboss-all
There were probably 50 to 100
OK david jencks pointed out that I was checking out jboss-all instead of
jboss-head
never mind
It remains that chris kimpton stuff seems gone?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of marc fleury
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 12:47 PM
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of David Jencks
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 1:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CLEAN BUILD FAILS
Marc, pay attention to the dev list, and always explain what
you are
Bugs item #644287, was opened at 2002-11-26 19:05
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=644287group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: James Manning (jmm)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #644289, was opened at 2002-11-26 11:10
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=644289group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #644289, was opened at 2002-11-26 11:10
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=644289group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #641740, was opened at 2002-11-21 01:37
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=641740group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Vladimir Korenev (vkorenev)
Ok, I finally got a handle on the IllegalAccessError that has been reported for a
while now and have a trivial testcase that demonstrates the problem. See the
bug details here:
[ 644289 ] ClassLoader issue with protected access and manifest refs
Hi,
The hourly compiles are there still - although the URL has changed:
http://jboss.kimptoc.net/
...although I am not sure why there was no email about the problem
earlier...
The nightly tests currently do not complete - hence the title on the build
page and the outstanding bug.
I have
Bugs item #644287, was opened at 2002-11-26 19:05
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=644287group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: James Manning (jmm)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #644287, was opened at 2002-11-26 19:05
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=644287group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: James Manning (jmm)
Assigned to:
I setup anthill to do the builds in a automated fashion at our company,
it's a lot more easier to setup than CC (which I tried without success
:) ). You just have to make some tricks to keep all the ant logs and
junit results in different dirs. If want some help to configure it to
run jboss,
Could we just write our own URLClassloader that handles this stuff
correctly? We have the URL and Zip classes available.
-dain
On Tuesday, November 26, 2002, at 01:29 PM, Scott M Stark wrote:
Ok, I finally got a handle on the IllegalAccessError that has been
reported for a
while now and
Number of tests run: 995
Successful tests: 987
Errors:7
Failures: 1
[time of test: 2002-11-26.11-56 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
Bugs item #644287, was opened at 2002-11-26 19:05
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=644287group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: James Manning (jmm)
Assigned to:
where should I post correction to jboss 3.0.4 adm. and devel. Second
Edition?
by this list?
by bug at source forge?
--
| Emerson Cargnin |
| Analista de Sistemas Sr. |
| Tel : (051) 3358-4959|
| SICREDI Serviços |
| Porto Alegre - Brasil|
maybe Steven Coy could give a tip on this?? (he created the
oracle-service.xml)
David Jencks wrote:
I admit I have never set it up and tried it...
In the oracle-service.xml specify a jaas security domain
In the jaas security domain setup in login-conf.xml use the
CallerIdentityLoginModule.
I'm trying to get PetStore 1.3.1 running with 3.2 but its DAO code uses
ResultSet.absolute() which is not supported by hsqldb 1.6 but is by 1.7.1
Will the changes to support 1.7.1 be backported to 3.2 before its release?
thanks
jeremy
---
Won't this eliminate the possiblity of redeploying a subpackage of say an
unpacked .ear deployment? In fact, I have been able to redeploy subpackage
of a packaged .ear using emacs ability to modify a .jar file's contents and
the main deployers ability to redeploy packages explicitly.
I take it
Post a patch on sf.net
--jason
On Tuesday, November 26, 2002, at 01:21 PM, Emerson Cargnin - SICREDI
Serviços wrote:
where should I post correction to jboss 3.0.4 adm. and devel. Second
Edition?
by this list?
by bug at source forge?
--
| Emerson Cargnin
I am not sure, but I believe the changes to back port might be small...
you could post a patch... getting you closer to a RW... if you want it
that is.
--jason
On Tuesday, November 26, 2002, at 01:55 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I'm trying to get PetStore 1.3.1 running with 3.2 but its DAO code
Patches item #644394, was opened at 2002-11-26 17:04
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=644394group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott Walters (scottw512)
Assigned
Patches item #644397, was opened at 2002-11-26 21:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=644397group_id=22866
Category: JBossDoc
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Emerson Cargnin (echofloripa)
Assigned to:
Patches item #644398, was opened at 2002-11-26 21:11
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=644398group_id=22866
Category: JBossDoc
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Emerson Cargnin (echofloripa)
Assigned to:
i did it in JBossDoc category. correct me if it was the wrong place.
Jason Dillon wrote:
Post a patch on sf.net
--jason
On Tuesday, November 26, 2002, at 01:21 PM, Emerson Cargnin - SICREDI
Serviços wrote:
where should I post correction to jboss 3.0.4 adm. and devel. Second
Edition?
by
Code is under jboss-head/aop
It compiles but that's about it. Its incomplete.
The new direction is shown in the below xml if you can follow along. Don't
have much time for explanation before Thanksgiving, but the idea is POJOs
and DynamicProxies married into one framework. Field access,
Field access, Constructors and methods interceptable on POJOs.
With bytecode generation on the framework?
well done my friend you are a king, JB4 is the mother of java middleware
design
marcf
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get
tisdagen den 26 november 2002 kl 22.55 skrev Jeremy Boynes:
I'm trying to get PetStore 1.3.1 running with 3.2 but its DAO code uses
ResultSet.absolute() which is not supported by hsqldb 1.6 but is by
1.7.1
Will the changes to support 1.7.1 be backported to 3.2 before its
release?
Is that a
Bugs item #644439, was opened at 2002-11-27 00:40
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=644439group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bill Alexander (balexander)
Assigned to:
wow... This will take AOP to the next level (interceptors on fields and and
constructors? WOW.). I'll checkout your stuff tonight.
Regards,
Hiram
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
Burke
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 3:39 PM
To:
Bugs item #644439, was opened at 2002-11-26 16:40
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=644439group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bill Alexander (balexander)
Assigned to:
onsdagen den 27 november 2002 kl 01.36 skrev Peter Fagerlund:
The schedule is/was set for 3.2RC ...
So in short ... i am not doing it ... show yourselfs ... ( hint ; Jason
do not know how to ) ...
/thesame
---
This SF.net email is
There is really nothing incorrect about the behavior of the current class loading. Its
our use
of multiple class loaders that is conflicting with the type system.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] ClassLoader issue with protected access and manifest refs
Won't this eliminate the possiblity of redeploying a subpackage of say an
Curious, but does the ajp (or whatever the apache connector is called)
use many threads? If it does, then would it make sense to use nio
there too?
--jason
On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 08:33 AM, Greg Wilkins wrote:
It's important to remember that the jetty nio implementation
is
Bugs item #644496, was opened at 2002-11-27 02:48
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=644496group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: longjianglei (catherine_long)
Assigned to:
On 2002.11.26 20:13:14 -0500 Scott M Stark wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] ClassLoader issue with protected access and
manifest refs
Won't this eliminate
Number of tests run: 1038
Successful tests: 1024
Errors:12
Failures: 2
[time of test: 2002-11-27.02-28 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_05]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems
Bugs item #644496, was opened at 2002-11-27 02:48
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=644496group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: longjianglei (catherine_long)
Assigned to:
OK we have a transaction associated with the thread, each invocation
and the each context has a transaction (very confusing). Once we get
by the tx interceptor should all of these be the same thing? If we are
suspending the transaction for the invocation (Not Supported) should
the ctx and
this happening now in 3.2 or 3.0, is it being done in 4.0?
I don't think so. I don't understand what you mean here. If I have an
[expanded] .ear with
entities.jar
sessions.jar
webstuff.war
I think I should be able to redeploy:
webstuff.war
or
webstuff.war and sessions.jar
On 2002.11.26 22:26:30 -0500 Dain Sundstrom wrote:
OK we have a transaction associated with the thread, each invocation
and the each context has a transaction (very confusing). Once we get
by the tx interceptor should all of these be the same thing?
yes (at least the thread and invocation,
Hello all,
Where can I put the ejb components and the web
components in the JBoss heirarchy in an exploded
format.
Thanks in advance
Rosh Nair
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Is that the way is is supposed to work, because it is not the way it is
today. When we have a Not Supported method the invocation in the
context is not reset to null. I can make the change, but I want to be
certain that this is the desired behavior.
Also does anyone know the correct handling
Is it legal to call getTransaction on the TransactionManager in
afterComplete? It seems to work, but is it legal?
-dain
On Tuesday, November 26, 2002, at 11:55 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Is that the way is is supposed to work, because it is not the way it
is today. When we have a Not
David,
Is a ThreadLocal lookup more expensive than a hashmap lookup??
Regards,
Hiram
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
Jencks
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] 3 Transactions?
I assume you can define where that is by enabling the following MBean in
jboss-service.xml:
!-- An alternate hot deployer mbean. Use URLDirectoryScanner if you
need to
specify which urls are directories to scan, and which are urls to be
deployed directly. URLDeploymentScanner assumes
Greg is in Geneva for the week, but when he gets back, I'll ask him
about this,
Jules
Jason Dillon wrote:
Curious, but does the ajp (or whatever the apache connector is called)
use many threads? If it does, then would it make sense to use nio
there too?
--jason
On Thursday, November 21,
60 matches
Mail list logo
