When I was cleaning up stuff, creation of system module and related
work, I was planning on moving all of the EJB specific bits to
jboss/ejb, which is why I created the module. It will probably take a
day or so to make the move and test it. I can take a stab at it and
let ya know. The
Whatever happened to the NetBoot PetStore work?
--jason
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL
Hiya Stefan.
They should be, but aren't in SUN JDK 1.3.x and others. There
is a test
case for this on Bill Pugh website at
http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel/
Thanks for this link, it's very interesting. I've actually
come across most of the papers in other contexts but never
MarshalledValue's constructor is
public MarshalledValue(Object obj) throws IOException
{
baos = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
MarshalledValueOutputStream mvos = new MarshalledValueOutputStream(baos);
mvos.writeObject(obj);
mvos.flush();
isHashComputed = false;
Bugs item #692157, was opened at 2003-02-24 10:53
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=692157group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Laurent Wozniak (lwozniak)
Assigned
Patches item #696499, was opened at 2003-03-03 11:44
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=696499group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Gabriel Buades Rubio (u07286)
Hi All,
I have written an entity bean with the persistance
store as MySQL. Now I have added transaction management for all the methods
present in the remote interface. I am able to make calls to findermethods,
create a new record and I can execute all the other methods like getClss,
what
version of jboss are you running. I thought this was fixed in 3.0.5 or
3.0.6.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
Bijoy Sivan .KSent: Monday, March 04, 2002 7:53
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
[JBoss-dev] removing
Is this an XDoclet thing again?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 8:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed
Hi,
I managed to do the 3.0 backpatch, whith just a few midifications. I had
to change the invoke name on the invokera (hopsidaisy) but it seems to
work find with the testsuites (although I am not fully shure since I
have never configured my system for clustering).
Now I am wondering: is this
If you guys are going to do this, do it soon. Eventually I need to touch a
butt load of files in EJB land.
Thanks,
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dain
Sundstrom
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 1:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
my last sugestion on how to enhance the scoped loader repository stuff
does not seems to have been welcomed into JBoss. However it would be
verry nice if it was possible to extends LoaderRespoitory and
EARDeployer outside of the jboss package hierarkies. This is not
possible now due to some
I don't think so, the error is not shown.
I built fresh from a clean checkout last night with no problems. The
problem may be that Chris is not doing a clean checkout every day.
david jencks
On 2003.03.03 09:41 Bill Burke wrote:
Is this an XDoclet thing again?
-Original Message-
Bugs item #696633, was opened at 2003-03-03 15:34
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=696633group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Phil Dawes (pdawes)
Assigned to:
This morning I had problems with this error and clean build.
The error was out of memory.
JDK 1.3.1_05
Windows2000
alex
Monday, March 03, 2003, 5:06:03 PM, David Jencks wrote:
DJ I don't think so, the error is not shown.
DJ I built fresh from a clean checkout last night with no problems. The
Would it be possible for someone who knows/has both windows and linux
scripting to investigate this? I recall that I had to increase the memory
for the build in the build.sh files and I don't know if this was ever done
in the build.bat files.
thanks
david jencks
On 2003.03.03 10:34 Alex
Bugs item #696663, was opened at 2003-03-03 11:19
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=696663group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Igor Fedorenko (igorfie)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #692157, was opened at 2003-02-24 02:53
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=692157group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Laurent Wozniak (lwozniak)
Assigned
I agree. As I begin the development of JMS/JBoss 4.0, I'm, frankly,
confused as to which direction to go concerning the interceptor
framework--which project is THE project? There is some great work being
done right now by a variety of people on this problem, but I have no
idea how it all fits
I made several changes to NetBoot triggered by this, see
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=660839group_id
=22866atid=381174
There is a revised netboot-demo module in the applications tree that
builds a ear with the standard JBoss configs plus a petstore config, all
of which
Bugs item #696633, was opened at 2003-03-03 07:34
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=696633group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Pending
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Phil Dawes (pdawes)
Assigned
You can apply this to 3.0. I will handle the changes to allow for subclassing
LoaderRespoitory.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Peter Antman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Someone pointed out a post today on the Maven-dev list which said that
JBoss wants to move to Maven. Is there any truth in this and if so,
any idea of how the move is going to be made? I've been looking at Maven
a bit recently and my guess is that the move might not be entirely
painless.
--
Yes, the redeploy semantic through the proxy was too much. I will handle the
changes to allow for subclassing LoaderRespoitory this week.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Peter Antman
The AOP framework really right now is only for POJO interception. I do have
the beginnings of DynamicProxies though. The AOP POJO framework can
intercept static and member methods, constructors, and fields. YOu can
define metadata on a class via xml, as well as interceptor stacks at the
Class
On 2003.03.02 16:16 Nathan Phelps wrote:
I agree.
With what, specifically?
As I begin the development of JMS/JBoss 4.0, I'm, frankly,
confused as to which direction to go concerning the interceptor
framework--which project is THE project? There is some great work being
done right now by
Herr Buildmeister Jason casually mentioned in a recent post that he was
looking at Maven.
This sounds like a severe case of gun jumping on the part of the Maven
team to me.
Someone pointed out a post today on the Maven-dev list which said that
JBoss wants to move to Maven. Is there any
I am looking into using Maven for JBoss... nothing more, nothing less.
Comments on your experience would be helpful though... :-)
--jason
On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 02:01 AM, Luke Taylor wrote:
Someone pointed out a post today on the Maven-dev list which said that
JBoss wants to move to
Jason is looking at it but there are no plans to use at this point as it has yet
to be proven that is cure is not worse then the current build disease.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Luke
I'm working on an automated script to get and build from source, run the
testsuite and post the results. It's about 90% complete - isn't everything?
I expect to use it internally for testing on various os/jvm combinations.
And, with a little luck, establish a site to post the results and collect
Bugs item #696819, was opened at 2003-03-03 12:17
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=696819group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stefan Reich (sreich)
Assigned to:
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 2:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
On
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.1_06
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
And I'm saying I want a prototype that demonstrates how the various interceptor
offerings work in the context of a real service. Part of the testsuite for a given
interceptor framework needs to demonstrate the following in order of increasing
functionality:
1. Allow for user defined interceptors
First, thanks for responding.
On 2003.03.03 15:29 Bill Burke wrote:
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 2:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bugs item #696819, was opened at 2003-03-03 12:17
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=696819group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Remind
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stefan Reich (sreich)
Assigned to: Scott M
All of the code in the org.jbossmx package seems to be obsolete
code that has never been used. Is there any reason to keep this around?
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
---
Patches item #696918, was opened at 2003-03-03 23:17
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=696918group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Martin Schaefer (mschaefer)
Assigned to:
we have lately modified create entity commands and it should be fairly simple
to integrate that into head and 3.2 branch.
org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/JDBCAbstractVendorCreateCommand is an
abstarct class that provide support for that. So far we have 4
vendor implementations. With that one that
persistence is not realistic for a prototype. The rest is.
, #2, and #3a if I can focus solely on this for 5 days with no interuptions.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott
M Stark
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 3:50 PM
To: [EMAIL
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1065
Successful tests: 1060
Errors:1
Failures: 4
[time of test: 2003-03-03.13-17 GMT]
[java.version:
Patches item #696910, was opened at 2003-03-03 23:03
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=696910group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Martin Schaefer (mschaefer)
Assigned to:
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.1_06
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
I am using JBoss
Release: JBoss-3.0.3
- Original Message -
From:
Bill Burke
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 8:10
PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] removing bean
lock and it has tx set
what
version of jboss are you running. I thought this was
Hi,
I have downloaded the latest version of JBOSS
3.0.6
Still I am getting the following error
ERROR [BeanLock] removing bean lock and it has
tx set! QPL bean=ItemGroup id=Six tx=TransactionImpl:XidImpl [FormatId=257,
GlobalId=bijoy//1, BranchQual=] synched=false timeout=30 queue=[]
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Bill Burke wrote:
1. Source located in neutral territory, namely the common module.
ok
2. Sequence of interceptors determined by (iterator in) invocation object.
This could be a modifiable iterator at some point. This allows the
interceptor stack to be modified per
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.1_06
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
Hi,
--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think so, the error is not shown.
I built fresh from a clean checkout last night with no problems.
The
problem may be that Chris is not doing a clean checkout every day.
There is a link on the page to request a full checkout - which
48 matches
Mail list logo
