] On Behalf Of Julien Viet
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 1:55 AM
To: Manik Surtani
Cc: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Ryan Campbell; Steve Ebersole;
Julien Viet; Roy Russo; QA
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: FW: jboss-4.0.4 portal-2.2 issue
the real question is : why JBoss AS does not ship
Break up the jars into more reusable pieces then.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Wang
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:46 AM
To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Manik Surtani
Cc: Ryan Campbell; Steve Ebersole; Julien Viet; Roy Russo; QA
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Re: FW: jboss-4.0.4
If I recall correctly, they tried that setup initially but ran into the
locking issues that plagued the earlier Hibernate/JBossCache
integrations.
Conceivably they could try with the new optimistic-locking-based
provider, but we really need some performance numbers here to see how a
local,
1/ JBoss Cache sucks with hibernate and ehcache works better (so far)
2/ If I use JBoss Cache X with Portal Y and I run in AS version Z in
config ALL that use JBoss Cache X', then I have an integration issue.
Steve Ebersole wrote:
If I recall correctly, they tried that setup initially but
Good point - why doesn't Portal ship with Hibernate configured with
JBoss Cache?
On 12 May 2006, at 19:34, Adrian Brock wrote:
SNIP /
The solutions are:
1) JBoss Portal's session factory is configured to use JBoss Cache
not EhCache
SNIP /
the real question is : why JBoss AS does not ship with JBoss Cache in
the default configuration ?
Manik Surtani wrote:
Good point - why doesn't Portal ship with Hibernate configured with
JBoss Cache?
On 12 May 2006, at 19:34, Adrian Brock wrote:
SNIP /
The solutions are:
1) JBoss
