https://facelets.dev.java.net/nonav/docs/dev/docbook.html#config-webapp-security
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4022792#4022792
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4022792
__
The WACL should *always* be used as jsf-facelets.jar is in WEB-INF/lib.
We don't think its facelets that is the problem, but probably JBoss AS.
Anyway, I now have a reasonably simple working testcase of this going wrong (I
just need to tidy it up a bit and make it easier to run) - hopefully i'l
Oops, no, this is better
|
|
|
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4022357#4022357
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4022357
___
jboss-u
At the very least it should be this
|
|
|
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4022328#4022328
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4022328
anonymous wrote : I'd like to show my list with key fields only and my edit
form with fields for each detail for the selected item.
| So when do I start a conversation?On each select?
This is the pattern I use for a list/detail page.
I I were using an editable table, I would start the conversa
anonymous wrote : And, I found that even if the classloader inside
FaceletsRenderer is the WACL then the UCL may be used to initialise facelets.
Oops, no, thats not right...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4022164#4022164
Reply to the post :
So, I've run into this (in anger) as well now.
1) Facelets scans the classpath for .taglib.xml files inside of META-INF, and
loads them if it finds them (thats what all the load implicit stuff you see is).
2) The UCL doesn't scan WEB-INF/lib (as this is a special war thing).
So, if you get th
You could easily do this using a container tag (take a look at UIValidateAll)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4022120#4022120
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4022120
_
anonymous wrote : I'm just wondering whether it makes sense to combine listing
and all create, read, update and delete functionality all on the same page?
|
JSF allows you to do this easily (an editable table, which is a nightmare in
PHP type stuff). I suppose you just choose what is best fo
You would be better off asking this in a JSF forum (Sun's JSF forum perhaps, or
myfaces user list if you are using myfaces) as this really isn't a Seam
question.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4021774#4021774
Reply to the post :
http://www.jb
"bsmithjj" wrote : Pete,
|
| Here is a report on the classloader situation just before I invoke my SLSB
that sends email:
Sorry, I meant on entry to the method called by JSF (i.e. is something changing
your classloader between JSF calling the action method and you calling the
MailSenderBea
Brad, I've managed to replicate your problem doing this:
Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader(facesContext.getClass().getClassLoader());
inside FaceletsRenderer.render() (in the mail example facesContext is using the
UCL).
I'm not sure under what circumstances the context's classloader
And
* If you place everything in the ear myfaces blows up when rendering email
* Placing the relevant taglibs where both classloaders can get them is a
workaround
I *think* that the FaceletsRenderer needs to make sure its using the correct
classloader?
View the original post :
http://www.jbos
So, to sumamrise the problem as I understand it:
* the FaceletsRenderer calls out to facelets to render the page (making no
alteration to the classloader used)
* Normally the classloader used is the WebappClassLoader (it is in the examples
always afaics) HOWEVER sometimes it ends up being the JB
Thanks for the reply James and sorry for the delay in replying - my forum
subscriptions went wrong for a bit ;)
I'll try this out on Monday.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4021586#4021586
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?mo
This is very useful information :) I'm hoping to work on this at some point
this weekend.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4021208#4021208
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4021208
___
There were some problems with s:selectItems in 1.1.6 (fixed in CVS) which meant
that noSelectionLabel didn't work quite right.
So, in CVS, if the noSelectionLabel is selected a value of null will be passed
to the entity converter, which passes this straight through to the backing
bean. I know
You would be better off using 1.1.6 (or 1.1.7 when its released next week) -
1.0.0 is old now.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4021120#4021120
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4021120
___
Just to check, you're calling Renderer.instance().render(template) from a
method that has been called "directly" from JSF not via a JBPM action (or some
other indirect method e.g. Events) - i.e. the render is by the method called
from JSF or by a method it calls etc.
I know there are issues cal
Also, I'll see if I can replicate the problem by restructuring the mail example
along the ear layout you've described above. If you could post your
application.xml that would help with this :)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4021054#4021054
Re
Feel free to update the wiki page :)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4021023#4021023
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4021023
___
jboss-user mailing
The only reason I ask for a seam-gen based project is that it comes with a
build.xml/structure I'm familiar with hence reducing the complexity for me.
I'm not going to ask you to send your whole project through as it would takes
days to understand it. I'm pretty sure (as are you I think) the pr
As I've said before, this problem is subtle and so to be able to help any
further I need a simple example (ideally built on seam-gen) showing the
problem. Thanks
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020812#4020812
Reply to the post :
http://www.j
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020640#4020640
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4020640
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
htt
So I think the thing is here that unless Seam actually started providing a
basic User class (which would be a bad thing as this is domain model specific)
there is no sensible way to store any information about the user on Identity.
FWIW I just extend Identity and add get/setUser methods to it (
Please post some code, your description is hard to follow.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020602#4020602
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4020602
1, 2) Yup, they really need to create an xhtml div/css based renderer (IMO) - I
suppose we should start nagging ;)
http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-501 - easy but waiting on them
releasing :(
Can you just use h:input***?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=
You know that Trinidad does most of this for you right? (but if you want to
customise what it looks like...) - it flags invalid fields with a cross, and
puts the error message underneath.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020038#4020038
Reply to
Just use a factory
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4019597#4019597
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4019597
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@l
The message can be overridden in your resource bundle with the property key
org.jboss.seam.loginSuccessful.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4019591#4019591
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=40
2) As it's in the commented code it gets treated as a valuebinding rather than
a method binding (JSF is attempting to just write it out as part of the
comment).
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4019589#4019589
Reply to the post :
http://www.jbo
It's pretty new (since 1.1.5 or 1.1.6) (hence no examples) but I have to say I
find it wonderful (I use a mix of .page.xml and pages.xml - and there should be
/path/to//view/pages.xml soon for a medium-granularity approach).
I find it fits *really* well with putting navigation in pages.xml - its
"lightbulb432" wrote : For example, in a list of entities I'd like to show next
to it the result of a query (i.e. that value isn't stored as a property of the
entity, but is evaluated as a result of a query).
You could use the map hack for this (look at Seam's isUserInRole) or preprocess
as I m
"lightbulb432" wrote : What is the recommended method of executing a query for
each line in a DataModel or list of entities on a page upon each load?
You can't do it like this. You would have to preprocess the list in your
factory method. Normally you can avoid doing this by getting the datamo
#{application.name} references a String, you are trying to set it with a
Application object. Likewise for language.Read up on JSF converters and
what they do. And take a look at the EntityConverter on the wiki as it does
what you are trying to do for you...
View the original post :
http:
It looks to me like ejb3 is swallowing the stack trace (it has an annoying
habit of doing this in async stuff). We need the stack of the original
exception (wrap your code in a try-catch and use e.printStackTrace()).
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtop
"lawrieg" wrote : Are you saying that all you have to do to make a Seam-managed
Javabean component is inject EntityManager and mark all methods as
@Transactional and it will then give you the same behaviour as a SFSB (i.e. the
only difference is that Seam handles storing and fetching the compone
You've probably got errors occuring on the coversion, validation or update
model phase. Put an h:messages component on the page to see.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4019302#4019302
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=
"lawrieg" wrote : Now where I'm getting bit lost (and I might be being a bit
thick because I'm full of flu and didn't get much sleep last night) is how you
would actually implement the Seam-managed Javabeans approach. How does Seam
know to make a regular Javabean into a Seam-managed Javabean (an
Just
|
|
surely?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4019277#4019277
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4019277
___
jboss-user mailing list
jbos
As mentioned in the docs you can only use the EL enhancement on method
bindings, not value bindings (i.e. a get/is/set)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4019243#4019243
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mod
You might want to outject something from a conversation scoped component (where
you can use your SMPC to prevent LIEs) to the businessprocess scope. As for
variable name - perhaps in a large app where you want shorter names in the
class?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.htm
Build a very very simple example (that *just* shows this) created using
seam-gen from current CVS, remove the lib dir, and email it to me (pmuir at
bleepbleep dot org dot uk)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4019043#4019043
Reply to the post :
Tbh I haven't found much difference between one strategy and the other - you
don't have to write interfaces with Seam Java Beans (+1), its fewer
annotations, and I generally have no need of anything a SF/SLSB gives me over a
JavaBean ( + I use the EntityHome/EntityController stuff very extensive
Just to complicate it even further you can use Seam managed JavaBeans with
methods marked @Transactional and an SMPC instead (these are by default
conversational - e.g. EntityHome). I tend to use these instead of SLSB/SFSB
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=v
Nope. I use an seam-gen based ant script, I just add -Xdebug
-Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,address=8787,server=y,suspend=n as 'VM
arguements' to the server launch config, start it in normal mode, then attach a
debugger as described. I've never got it to launch using the debug start.
View the
Sorry, I'm blind :(
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018905#4018905
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4018905
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@
You probably need to be in a conversation
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018896#4018896
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4018896
___
jboss-user ma
Post the stack trace.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018893#4018893
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4018893
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-use
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=98294
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018865#4018865
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4018865
You've misspelt the parameter.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018860#4018860
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4018860
___
jboss-user mailing list
[url]http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-474[/ur]
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018848#4018848
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4018848
___
No, it's for method bindings only.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018833#4018833
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4018833
___
jboss-user mailing l
I never managed to get the EL extension working with Trinidad (no Ajax4JSF in
there) - have others?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018826#4018826
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4018826
__
"grdzeli_kaci" wrote : i could not find about converter into seam-ui examples.
|
examples/ui/src/org/jboss/seam/example/ui/Converters
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018755#4018755
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=
That (obviously) is a problem with your converter. Either try the
entityConverter as I suggested or take a look at the Seam ui-example for how to
write a suitable converter.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018733#4018733
Reply to the post :
try
|
|
|
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018722#4018722
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4018722
___
jboss-user mailing list
jbos
Yup, I find jrockit avoids all the permgen stuff and decreases my JBoss AS
start time to about 3/5ths. Apparently Java 6 also improves performance.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018584#4018584
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.
Oops. Thanks for that, fixed in CVS
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018521#4018521
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4018521
___
jboss-user mailing
Please wait for 1.1.7.GA or use Seam from CVS (sorry, this was a bug in
1.1.6.GA)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018472#4018472
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4018472
You need to post the exception (and full stack trace) that occurs earlier in
startup
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018339#4018339
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4018339
_
Try
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018319#4018319
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=40183
Put it in JIRA :)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018318#4018318
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4018318
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@li
Ask this on the hibernate JSR-220 forum.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4018316#4018316
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4018316
___
jboss-user mai
Sounds like for some reason the datamodel isn't getting outjected straight
away. Perhaps try outputting a logical outcome and specifying a redirect
navigation rule *might* help. Otherwise you could try explicitly clearing the
searchResults varialbe in basicSearch() - or try using an EntityQuer
Put a break point on the District.getStores() method and see what the stores
variable contains. If it has only one store then the problem is hibernate
related (so ask there as you'll get more help), otherwise come back here. Make
sure you are working with an uptodate version of the entity.
Vi
For problem 1:
Is your SMPC called entityManager? If not are you correctly telling the
entityConverter what it is called (see the wiki).
If you put a breakpoint at AbstractEntityConverter:170 can you check that (a)
whether the correct Lookup is used and (b) whether the correct entityManager is
1) Make sure you are in a conversation
2) components.xml IIRC
but that error is more serious and means the entityconverter hasn't been able
do its job. Make sure you are using 1.1.6 not 1.1.5. Are you getting that
error when you don't select an option?
View the original post :
http://www.jb
"lightbulb432" wrote : "petemuir" wrote : My best guess as to why it fails from
what you've said is that by passing the instance through the datamodel like
that it has become unmanaged so cannot be removed - you can check this by
calling entityManager.contains().
This is an equally valid way of doing it (and neat as well - avoids exposing
your id's to the world) but I guess it's tricky to get working.
My best guess as to why it fails from what you've said is that by passing the
instance through the datamodel like that it has become unmanaged so cannot be
Put a h:message component on the selectOneListbox (or better still keep a
h:messages component running for the whole page during devel) and check what
validation/update/conversion errors you are getting.
And I've never had a problem with the style the ref manual recommends for
EntityHome's and
Also, specifically, I would make sure you have facelets and myfaces-impl not in
the ear root but either in jsf-libs or WEB-INF/lib
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017643#4017643
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=
I agree its classloading related. As I said, I can take a look, but i'm not
convinced I would have any more luck than you!
So, this is how I lay it out:
1) Use the default JBoss (4.0.5.GA) install (so myfaces in jsf-libs)
2) Put everything I can, especially the jars that provide UI (so jsf-face
You have in your components.xml right? As Seam's
Identity is not marked @Install(value=false) by putting that line in
components.xml you end up creating an Identity component (which has APPLICATION
precedence (as per the defaults)). So, what you in fact need to do, in
components.xml, is to c
[Sorry about the rant below - I would claim its an attempt to drag back on
topic, but as I can't answer the question I guess it isn't ;)]
"fhh" wrote : It means that they are only accessible from subclasses or from
any class of that package. Anyway, that is not a security feature. It is used
to
This is key part of the above stack trace:
Caused by: org.hibernate.hql.ast.QuerySyntaxException: User is not mapped
[select user from User user]
I would infer from this that something went wrong with your generate entities.
Does the User object exist and is it mapped?
View the original post
I use this:
@Name("org.jboss.seam.security.identity")
| public class Identity extends org.jboss.seam.security.Identity {
|
| ...
|
|public static Identity instance() {
| if ( !Contexts.isSessionContextActive() ) {
| throw new IllegalStateException("No active sess
Use page parameters:
|
|
|
|
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017531#4017531
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4017531
___
jbos
It makes it harder to use a bad architecture/design ;)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017521#4017521
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4017521
___
No, bijection (and almost all other Seam annotations) doesn't happen in
entities.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017507#4017507
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4017507
Hi
I'm trying to import a large amount of data (using JDBC) and I hit the
TransactionTimeout (as defined in jta-service.xml). I know I can alter the
timeout in jta-service.xml, but I would really prefer to just alter it for the
import method, not the whole application.
Is this possible?
TIA
No, I've only tested with the version that Seam is currently including (1.1.12).
If you've worked through my above suggestions, please put a simple example that
shows the problem in JIRA and I'll work through it.
Btw, sorry about being terse yesterday ;)
View the original post :
http://www.jbo
1) Use ajax (a4j works well with Seam, and the booking example shows partial
validation)
2) Don't use ajax, make sure the fields which aren't validated til later aren't
rendered until the first set of fields are valid.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewt
@DataModel and @DataModelSelection should be on the same bean. If you want to
use two beans then you should use the page parameter method (see a seam-gen
built project for an example)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4016944#4016944
Reply to th
Hmm. I have to say I haven't seen this before.
Can you get the mail example working?
I would suggest following it's layout - jboss-seam-mail.jar and
jboss-seam-ui.jar, jsf-facelets.jar in WEB-INF/lib rather than the ear (and
really myfaces-api/impl as well)
Otherwise, I would suggest wrappi
myfaces or ri? portal or normal?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4016549#4016549
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4016549
___
jboss-user mailing lis
What environment are you in?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4016521#4016521
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4016521
___
jboss-user mailing list
jb
Could you create a jira and attach a compileable, runnable project that shows
the problem. Thanks :)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4016429#4016429
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4016429
Are you inside a conversation?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4016394#4016394
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4016394
___
jboss-user mailing list
I think that /path/to/my/pages.xml is a good idea (similar to
/my/package/components.xml). If you like this, please add a feature request to
JIRA (Gavin may say no, but we can see ;) )
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4016349#4016349
Reply to t
But beware, if you are using core:resourceBundle in components.xml, you'll need
to change it to point at your overridden resource bundle
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4016327#4016327
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module
Not quite
ExtendedResourceBundle.java
| ...
| @Name("org.jboss.seam.core.resourceBundle")
| public class ExtendedResourceBundle extends
org.jboss.seam.core.ResourceBundle
| ...
| @Override
| protected ResourceBundle loadBundle(String bundleName) {
| try {
| Resou
well, as long as the navigation item will take an f:param you can do it that
way (see the Seam ref docs).
You can have more than one conversation running at once, you just can't have
more than one active conversation!
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewto
Just make sure that a navigation doesn't propagate the conversation (remember
non-Faces requests don't, or use an s:link with propagation="none").
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4016281#4016281
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.ht
I assume you mean jsf-facelets.jar in WEB-INF/lib folder - if not that might be
the problem. Otherwise you need to you need to make sure that jsf-facelets.jar
is available to the classloader that is loading the tag - i.e. if jsf-facelets
jar is in the war, the ComponentHandler should be as wel.
My rule of thumb is to use a pageflow where there is a natural flow (often some
sort of wizard) - the user wants to be able to work their way through solving a
complex problem. On the other hand pages.xml is brilliant for even the most
complex (in my book lots of tabs) CRUD.
I really like bein
The ui-example example demonstrates s:selectItems. As the entity converter is
not currently in Seam, there isn't an example for it in Seam ;)
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=SeamEntityConverter - the dist for
this contains an example directory - the directory is based upon the old
S
Please read the tips and troubleshooting section on the wiki. N.B. You would
be better off using 1.1.6, s:selectItems and ec:entityConverter.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4015960#4015960
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?m
Thanks, this is fixed in CVS
http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-770
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4015872#4015872
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4015872
http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-840
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4015764#4015764
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4015764
___
jboss-user
901 - 1000 of 1780 matches
Mail list logo
