Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
Saroj Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have a doubt about the time when ejbCreate() is called by JBOSS while
> loading the beans.
>
> Is it the case that when bean is loaded in the memory, ejbCreate is
> called or when any client looks up Home interf
t/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=563120&group_id=22866&atid=376685
I'm not an expert on these issues, but I think that the
problem is that on hot deploy another classloader load
the new class. But the datasource that does the
deserialization is still using th
.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
Anthony Geoghegan wrote:
>
> I have a element pointing to a bean in a seperate jar.
> However when I deploy the bean I get:
>
> 2002-08-19 11:01:57,984 WARN [org.jboss.system.ServiceController] Problem
> starting service
> jboss.j2ee:service=
Hi,
Sounds like you want to use the database login module
org.jboss.security.auth.spi.DatabaseServerLoginModule.
It fetches users, passwords and roles from a JDBC source,
and you can even customize the SELECTs to fit your
existing database.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
"Gary S. Cuozzo&q
interoperability problems with
other XA resources.
Oracle tried to do the same thing with their XA drivers, but
quickly had to fix it.
I would call this a bug in the Informix XA driver.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
David Stoleson wrote:
>
> Using a JMS Queue and a Message Driven Bean t
ansaction
timeout, you can raise that limit.
> I'm using Jboss 2.4.1
I'm at 3.1alpha, and not sure if I remember correctly.
Try looking for a line like
300
in your JBoss configuration file, and raise the timeout.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
--
to create the db on
> the start step.
Setting CreateOnStart to false didn't help me, but
manually deploying firebird-service.xml after the
rar solved my problem.
Thanks.
And thanks for this fine driver, btw.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
/jrockit-3.1-j2se-1.3.1-1.rpm.sh
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Caffeinated soap. No kidding.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL
his a known problem?
Do someone else have the firebird driver working in the current
cvs tree?
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
---
2002-07-04 12:00:10,444 INFO [org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer] Starting deployment
of package:
file:/home/osh/src/java/jboss/jboss/
e TM spit out tons of debug
information about what goes on with transactions.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
on instead?
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
Markus Menner wrote:
>
> It seems that there is something wrong in the Transaction system; is it ab
> bug in JBoss 2.4.1 ?
>
> Consider the following testcase:
>
> Synchonization object:
> *
> package com.mvcsoft.tests.dev
timeout value in
jboss.jcml.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
"Pedro Gómez" wrote:
>
> I am running a proccess and when i have few data it runs well, i mean it performs
>the commit and i can see the result in the DB, but when there are many data and the
>proccesses takes
Hi,
What if you move your jar to the JBoss lib/ext
directory instead of having it in your classpath?
I guess that should get you around security
restrictions.
Also, there is some unfinished JacORB-related
code in CVS module contrib/iiop that may provide
some hints.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard
the bean to
> increase the performance but when do a findByPrimaryKey
> it will took 2s an more. Is this normal?
Not sure what kind of proxies you are talking
about here.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
htt
this by letting your client call bean.getOrt()
and pass this as the argument to your changeMyOrt() method.
Alternatively, move this functionality to a stateless session
bean.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
Lutz Hilken wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> when calling a Bean (CMP) and passing a
rformance if you implement the isModified()
hack to avoid doing a store of unchanged data.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
the second data source you end
up with a heuristic, and your data integrity is void.
To get around that problem, use _real_ XA datasources, without
the wrapper.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
ooking it
up, you might be able to get around it by doing
it the other way: Looking it up, and then create
if not found.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard
Lutz Hilken wrote:
>
> Ok, I cut the piece for getting the TA: it's this:
>
>public static UserTransaction getTransaction
Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
Lutz Hilken wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to use Client-controlled transactions by using UserTransaction. When
> testing it, some problems occured. See this code:
>
> UserTransaction ta = null;
> try {
> String key = n
Hi,
If you don't mind lots of debug output, you can
change the constant named "trace" near the top
of src/main/org/jboss/tm/TxCapsule.java to true,
and recompile.
That should tell you just about everything
transaction-related going on in JBoss.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
est Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
> Edward Wang wrote:
>
> Hi, Sir:
>
> I am using JBoss 2.4 Beta, and I want to use the new feature "UserTransaction" in my
>stand alone client.
> I lookup it in the JNDI but failed to use it. May someone help me by giving some
>hint or ex
es
not currently work.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
r all our needs, by far.
If/when there is a nntp gateway to the forums, we could
set up a bidirectional gateway between the mailing list
and the newsgroup.
That way, everything would be nicely connected.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
___
JBoss-user m
Juha-P Lindfors wrote:
>
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Ole Husgaard wrote:
> > Netscape 4.61???
>
> Yep. Version 4.61 [en}-99147, win32 build to be exact.
>
> > I use that, and cannot even see the left side
> > navigation links on the front page of www.jboss.org,
>
Hi,
An instance of a class implementing Serializable
can still be non-serializable at runtime, if it
holds a reference to another instance that is not
serializable at runtime.
See: http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/1.2/docs/guide/serialization/
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
yan fan wrote
n see the left side
navigation links on the front page of www.jboss.org,
(big yellow blurb over the links) so I have not
been able to navigate to the forum.
Did you use a direct link?
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
P.S: Do you _really_ mean to shut down the jboss-
ssert(primaryKey.equals("org.jboss.test.cts.keys.AccountPK"));
assert(remoteInterface.equals("org.jboss.test.cts.interfaces.CtsBmp"));
System.out.println("Meta-data OK");
This test only tests the metadata for entity beans.
With which kinds of beans do you have these problems
that is/was a bug in JBoss.
Problem is that the container does not keep
track of open resources, and thus does not
know which connections to enlist.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net
e.
The EJB1.1 specification is surprisingly silent on this,
but the Javadocs for BeanMetaData.getHomeInterfaceClass()
says: "Obtain the Class object for the enterprise Bean's
home interface.".
Doesn't it work that way in JBoss?
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
___
be to other EJB servers, but to _anything_ that
is based on OTS and is capable of calling JBoss or
being called by JBoss.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
It is a lot easier, and less error-phrone,
to just declare your transaction needs in your
descriptor file and let the container handle it.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
ut" or "out"
parameter attributes, so _only_ return values
and exceptions are sent back to the client.
Try:
UserData getUserData(String username)
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Hi,
This is really no problem.
It is a known bug in JMX-RI.
JBoss detects it, logs it, and works around it.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
ralph wrote:
>
> Using v2.4.0 Beta out of the box ( unzip and call run.bat ) I find the
> following error message in the server.log:
>
>
in the server' exception.
I am not sure if there is any UserTransaction support
for web components, or how such support should be
implemented.
Consider delegating your transactional work to
session beans.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
Tomasz Skutnik wrote:
>
> Hi everybody.
>
>
llowed for
message beans too.)
So basically you are on your own if you want
to do this: No EJB conforming container can
support it.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
> Edward Wang wrote:
>
> Now I am using JBoss+Tomcat 2.22 pack.
>
> I setup a Datasource that connect to SQLServer 7.
ou do
not think that you do not get enough traffic
at your website!
If you want to unsubscribe from this list
yourself, that's your choice.
But PLEASE do not FORCE everybody else.
Did I make myself clear?
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
___
JBoss
) {}
> }
Or even better:
resource =
try {
} finally {
resource.close();
}
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
IBM or BEA) said: "We do NOT want to support
this; that driver will _never_ work in our
application server".
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
marc fleury wrote:
>
> the unicity of the Xid is a good question although I suspect that
> class+number is a unique combo, meaning that i
have to be
changed, as we do not want to have a RMI thread
waiting for each invocation request enqueued.
How do you get the measurements needed for the
adaptation?
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
advantage.
The conclusion is harsh, though obvious:
EJB1.1 CMP is no good.
I guess this is why CMP is changed for EJB2.0.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >From reading the EJB spec and a number of other documents, I have
> gained the impression that
e then
usually written to some kind of "delta" files.
When the backup is over, the main DB files are
unfrozen, and the DBMS applies the delta file to
the main database files. That makes the backup look
like a big read-only transaction reading the enti
ders that something JBoss-related
can be found somewhere. But is is _not_ OK that
this list be used for advertizing web sites where
something JBoss-related may be found at some point
in the future.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
as in freedom, not free
beer) redistribution, I would never have done
any work on JBoss.
When I do Open Source programming, I do not
receive payment, but that does not mean that
anybody can do whatever they want with my
work. I retain copyright, and it is always
under some license that _requires_
e of trademarks for Open Source products
protects against the use of the marks for products
that have been modified in an unauthorized way.
LGPL may give me permission to take the JBoss sources
and change them and sell the modified product. But the
trademark status of JBoss makes it impossible for me
to legally sell the modified product under the JBoss
name, unless I can obtain a license to use the
trademark.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
as in freedom, not free
beer) redistribution, I would never have done
any work on JBoss.
When I do Open Source programming, I do not
receive payment, but that does not mean that
anybody can do whatever they want with my
work. I retain copyright, and it is always
under some license that _requires_
ders that something JBoss-related
can be found somewhere. But is is _not_ OK that
this list be used for advertizing web sites where
something JBoss-related may be found at some point
in the future.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
e of trademarks for Open Source products
protects against the use of the marks for products
that have been modified in an unauthorized way.
LGPL may give me permission to take the JBoss sources
and change them and sell the modified product. But the
trademark status of JBoss makes it impossible for me
to legally sell the modified product under the JBoss
name, unless I can obtain a license to use the
trademark.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Hi,
Look for property TransactionTimeout in MBean
TransactionManagerService in your jboss.jcml
file.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
"Schouten, Andreas" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> we get sometimes a transaction rollback because a timeout. (Then indeed the
> connection to
GPL.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
P.S: IMHO enterprise beans do _not_ have
their right place in the JBoss core
server. It would be better if this was in
the contrib module.
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/li
Hi,
UserTransaction support for stand-alone clients was
just recently added to CVS. You may have to grap
the latest CVS sources if you need this now.
When you have it, a simple lookup of "UserTransaction"
will do.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
Ed Swierk wrote:
>
> I
en different VMs. But as
long as all transactional inter-bean calls are within
the local VM you should have no problems.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
51 matches
Mail list logo
