: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] AbstractInstanceCache deadlock
We patched this into production about half and hour ago, and went
back to 300 for the
overager period.
If you don't hear from me on Monday you'll know it's worked :)
Thanks for the quick patch
]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] AbstractInstanceCache deadlock
It can be disabled by a large number that will cause overflow of
the 2^31 value
when converted from seconds to milliseconds as this will result
in a negative
period. For example:
overager-period214748364/overager-period
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] AbstractInstanceCache deadlock
We patched this into production about half and hour ago, and went
back to 300 for the
overager period.
If you don't hear from me on Monday you'll know it's worked :)
Thanks for the quick patch and the advice
Hi,
We've just release a production service using JBoss 3.2.1 on Solaris with Sun's 1.4.2 JVM,
and we're seeing a deadlock on the AbstractInstanceCache for one of our stateful session
beans that's used heavily.
Over a period of time more and more threads become locked trying to insert or get
Examining now. Thanks for the thread dump as I would not be able to
investigate without.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew May
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-user
PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-user] AbstractInstanceCache deadlock
Hi,
We've just release a production service using JBoss 3.2.1 on
Solaris with Sun's 1.4.2 JVM,
and we're seeing a deadlock on the AbstractInstanceCache for one
of our stateful session
beans that's used heavily.
Over a period
: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-user] AbstractInstanceCache deadlock
Hi,
We've just release a production service using JBoss 3.2.1 on
Solaris with Sun's 1.4.2 JVM,
and we're seeing a deadlock on the AbstractInstanceCache for one
of our stateful session
beans
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew May
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-user] AbstractInstanceCache deadlock
Hi,
We've just release a production service using JBoss 3.2.1 on
Solaris with Sun's 1.4.2 JVM,
and we're
It can be disabled by a large number that will cause overflow of the 2^31 value
when converted from seconds to milliseconds as this will result in a negative
period. For example:
overager-period214748364/overager-period
--
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss
Ok, it is fixed in Branch_3_2 and HEAD. The fix is in
LRUEnterpriseContextCachePolicy.java
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott M
Stark
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 1:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user
10 matches
Mail list logo