> P.S. I am not trying to judge you folks, I just have to know what's
> going on here, and I definitely do not like all this silent
> undercover
> moves from both sides.
>From my outsider perspective, there has been alot more "silent undercover
moves" from the CDN members then what I've witness
Bill Burke wrote:
JBoss Group, as caretaker of the JBoss project, has recently decided to
remove CVS access committers for a few of our committers. We do not remove
from CVS without good reason nor without just cause. These are the reasons
for the removals:
1. These individuals have refused to d
2:28 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] Recent CVS removals
> P.S. I am not trying to judge you folks, I just have to know what's
> going on here, and I definitely do not like all this silent
> undercover
> moves from both sides.
>From my outsid
Phil Shrimpton wrote:
On Wednesday 06 August 2003 23:53, Brian Wallis wrote:
Hi,
http://sourceforge.net/projects/elba
I had a look (at one randomly selected file) and it is a direct copy with
the line "JBoss, the OpenSource EJB server" removed from the top.
This is obvious. JBoss as a trademark
> They did this on August 5, after you droped them from the project,
isn't it?
This is not entirely true...
The project was registered on 2003-07-18 at 11:30.
-James
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 08:33, Vladyslav Kosulin wrote:
> Bill Burke wrote:
>
> > JBoss Group, as caretaker of the JBoss project,
Separations and divorces are always painful for everone involved.
Unfortunately, only the principals can repair the situation. Everyone
else has to either take sides or suffer the pain along with both parties.
---
This SF.Net email sponsored
On Wednesday 06 August 2003 23:53, Brian Wallis wrote:
Hi,
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/elba
>
> I had a look (at one randomly selected file) and it is a direct copy with
> the line "JBoss, the OpenSource EJB server" removed from the top.
I had a look at a (random) file, and the author wa
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 08:49, Bill Burke wrote:
> 2. More importantly, we have learned that they have forked JBoss. We also
> believe they are preparing to submit it, or some derivation, to the new
> Apache Geronimo project which would violate copyright and LGPL. Our proof?
>
> http://sourceforge.net
JBoss Group, as caretaker of the JBoss project, has recently decided to
remove CVS access committers for a few of our committers. We do not remove
from CVS without good reason nor without just cause. These are the reasons
for the removals:
1. These individuals have refused to discuss design issu
