On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:30, vimal kumar wrote:
hi members,
i have downloaded smack an API to communicate with jabber in java.
Is It possible to develope shared whiteboard using smack API. since we
have to complete our project reply soon.
There are a number of ways you might want to do this,
Dear Friends,
I am working on whiteboarding using jabber. I would like to know if
there are any protocol recommendations/ pointers to the same. Thanking
you,
With warm regards,
Vimal Kumar
___
jdev mailing list
jdev@jabber.org
Hi Peter, hi Matt, ...
Matt Tucker schrieb am 2005-03-22 17:37:25:
You could use zero-configuration networking for the discovery:
To add to this thread, we already support multicast DNS (called
Rendezvous by Apple) in Jive Messenger (Open Source server at
http://www.jivesoftware.org).
May I
Hi All,
I have posted two messages to this mailing list, it doesnt seem to get
delivered to me, is it because, the sender is not sent a mail by the
mailing list manager? So, I am not sure if you are reading my messages.
Thanks,
-Praz.
___
jdev mailing
On 23 Mar 2005, at 0:31, Justin Karneges wrote:
On Tuesday 22 March 2005 05:31 pm, Julian Missig wrote:
On 22 Mar 2005, at 20:00, Justin Karneges wrote:
Ignoring how iChat may or may not do it, I figure the most
straightforward
answer would be to have the clients perform the xmpp-core s2s
protocol
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 06:16:53PM +0300, Alexey Nezhdanov wrote:
And this list is not moderated AFAIK.
If by moderated you mean that each message must be approved, then this
list is not moderated.
If by moderated you mean that someone (i.e., me) is watching what you
say and he will kick you
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 08:31:54PM -0500, Julian Missig wrote:
Honestly, I prefer iChat's approach. Clients already have client
libraries that speak the c2s protocol. You strip out some of the
login/auth stuff and just use c2s to one another. That requires a lot
less new implementation
FYI, it seems that jivesoftware.org is not responding to HTTP requests.
/psa
___
jdev mailing list
jdev@jabber.org
http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 06:27 am, Julian Missig wrote:
On 23 Mar 2005, at 0:31, Justin Karneges wrote:
3) stanzas need to indicate both the 'to' and the 'from' (since
either
workstation might have multiple users. yes, I think we should be
forward
thinking here).
Ok, this is
On 23 Mar 2005, at 16:00, Justin Karneges wrote:
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 06:27 am, Julian Missig wrote:
On 23 Mar 2005, at 0:31, Justin Karneges wrote:
3) stanzas need to indicate both the 'to' and the 'from' (since
either
workstation might have multiple users. yes, I think we should be
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 01:13 pm, Julian Missig wrote:
Yes, except that the iChat way of doing this makes a *lot* of sense.
I don't know how you're expecting to to distribute presence using DNS-
SD, but with iChat, the service it's advertising *is* the presence.
So this is sort of by
On 23 Mar 2005, at 16:47, Justin Karneges wrote:
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 01:13 pm, Julian Missig wrote:
Yes, except that the iChat way of doing this makes a *lot* of sense.
I don't know how you're expecting to to distribute presence using
DNS-
SD, but with iChat, the service it's advertising
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 02:07 pm, Julian Missig wrote:
I don't mean to be presumptuous or rude, but I really don't think
you've thought through DNS-SD and how peer-to-peer Jabber would work
with it nearly enough...
Probably not. I was just trying to see how much of our own protocol we
On 23 Mar 2005, at 18:33, Justin Karneges wrote:
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 02:07 pm, Julian Missig wrote:
I don't mean to be presumptuous or rude, but I really don't think
you've thought through DNS-SD and how peer-to-peer Jabber would work
with it nearly enough...
Probably not. I was just
Okay, I'm confused... am I to understand that the jabber protocol can
be implemented over UDP/TCP-multicast?? I can see now how it would
sort of work... is there a JEP on this??? I would assume that it would
follow something along these lines :
1) client broadcasts its presence (stream:stream
On 23 Mar 2005, at 19:13, Anthony Ortiz wrote:
Okay, I'm confused... am I to understand that the jabber protocol can
be implemented over UDP/TCP-multicast?? I can see now how it would
sort of work... is there a JEP on this??? I would assume that it would
follow something along these lines :
1)
I SEE!!! said the blind man to the deaf man...
That seems like an interesting idea, though I think the current jabber
protocol doesn't allow for this (am I right?) UDP/Multicast chatting
is old-school, but I had never thought of using xmpp over it. I'm
curious though... under this system, Jabber
There is no such thing as a JabberID in this system. JabberIDs are
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and depend upon having a server.
Identification in this system is dependent upon Multicast DNS and DNS-
SD, which is how you get the IPs to connect to, the machine names,
etc. All of that stuff is thus
18 matches
Mail list logo
