Thanks. I wasn't aware this was possible, though to be fair I didn't do
a great deal of homework on the subject. I should have chosen my words
more carefully.
I've updated the xmppd site to reflect this.
--
Eric Will -- http://www.ericw.org/
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:54:45PM +0530, Vinod Panicker wrote:
Hi,
It seems that server behaviour for handling presence subscribe stanzas
to non-existent users is undefined in the RFC. IMO, it should be
silently dropped.
RFC 3921 (XMPP IM), section 11.1, rule 2.
Also, what about roster
On 2/1/06, Ralph Meijer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:54:45PM +0530, Vinod Panicker wrote:
Hi,
It seems that server behaviour for handling presence subscribe stanzas
to non-existent users is undefined in the RFC. IMO, it should be
silently dropped.
RFC 3921
I found something else when looking at section 11. In 11.2, there is
no mention of application of privacy lists? When should presence-out
be checked for then?
On 2/1/06, Vinod Panicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/1/06, Ralph Meijer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Tucker wrote:
Hello all,
A couple of pubsub questions:
1) In section 14.4.3 pubsub#node_config FORM_TYPE the fields
pubsub#collection and pubsub#node_type are defined. They both seem
to be asking the same question -- whether a node is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Forwarding to the list.
/psa
- Original Message
Subject:Fw: JabberApplet Questions
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 14:08:39 -0500
From: Raymond M Bodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- - Forwarded by
