I found something else when looking at section 11. In 11.2, there is
no mention of application of privacy lists? When should presence-out
be checked for then?
On 2/1/06, Vinod Panicker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/1/06, Ralph Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:
On 2/1/06, Ralph Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:54:45PM +0530, Vinod Panicker wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems that server behaviour for handling presence subscribe stanzas
> > to non-existent users is undefined in the RFC. IMO, it should be
> > silently dropped.
>
>
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:54:45PM +0530, Vinod Panicker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems that server behaviour for handling presence subscribe stanzas
> to non-existent users is undefined in the RFC. IMO, it should be
> silently dropped.
RFC 3921 (XMPP IM), section 11.1, rule 2.
> Also, what about ro
Hi,
It seems that server behaviour for handling presence subscribe stanzas
to non-existent users is undefined in the RFC. IMO, it should be
silently dropped.
Do give me a bonk on the head if its there in the RFC someplace. If
not, probably could be added to xmppbis
Also, what about roster set
