Paul Curtis wrote:
And what all does this have to do with software development?
Not that much but the marketing list died quite some time ago.
But without marketing there won't be that much use for software
development ;)
Anyway, if you have suggestions for a better channel for this type of
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
What do you have in mind for user-friendly content changes on jabber.org?
Not sure because IMO jabber.org is fairly OK as a developers portal. But
this is the first sentence of the 'What is Jabber' page:
Jabber is a set of streaming XML protocols and technologies that
IMO it would be great if Jabber.org could focus on protocol
development and if jabbercentral (or whatever it's going to
be called) on guiding starting endusers or developers.
Or what if jabber.org was the community site and xmpp.org became the
protocol dev site?
Regards,
Matt
Matt Tucker wrote:
IMO it would be great if Jabber.org could focus on protocol
development and if jabbercentral (or whatever it's going to
be called) on guiding starting endusers or developers.
Or what if jabber.org was the community site and xmpp.org became the
protocol dev site?
That would be
On Monday 04 October 2004 11:46 am, Bart van Bragt wrote:
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
What do you have in mind for user-friendly content changes on jabber.org?
Not sure because IMO jabber.org is fairly OK as a developers portal. But
this is the first sentence of the 'What is Jabber' page:
Justin Karneges wrote:
On Monday 04 October 2004 11:46 am, Bart van Bragt wrote:
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
What do you have in mind for user-friendly content changes on jabber.org?
Not sure because IMO jabber.org is fairly OK as a developers portal. But
this is the first sentence of the 'What is
IMO it would be great if Jabber.org could focus on protocol
development and if jabbercentral (or whatever it's going to
be called) on guiding starting endusers or developers.
Or what if jabber.org was the community site and xmpp.org became the
protocol dev site?
No that would just confuse
